Legislature(1993 - 1994)
04/20/1994 08:40 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 251 "An Act relating to the commercial fishing revolving
loan fund and the fisheries enhancement revolving
loan fund."
HCS CSSB 251 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with
"no recommendation" and with a zero fiscal
note by the Department of Commerce and Economic
Development, dated 2/18/94.
SENATE BILL NO. 251
"An Act relating to the commercial fishing revolving loan
fund and the fisheries enhancement revolving loan fund."
Co-Chair Larson noted that SB 251 was held pending a motion
to move the bill from Committee. Representative Navarre
stated that his concerns in regards to the constitutionality
of the bill had been allayed.
Co-Chair MacLean expressed her desire to reconsider
Amendment l to SB 251.
Representative Foster WITHDREW his motion to move the bill
from Committee. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair MacLean MOVED to RESCIND the Committee's action in
failing to adopt Amendment 1. Amendment 1 deletes "one-half
of" on page 6, line 8. She explained that the fifty percent
provision was not included in the original version of the
bill. She emphasized that hatchery loans would be last on
the priority list. She stressed that surplus funds should be
available for hatchery loans.
GREG WINEGAR, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT explained, in response to questions by members,
that the amendment would not adversely effect the Commercial
Fishing Fund. The Department of Commerce and Economic
Development supports the amendment. He stressed that section
8 places conditions on the use of funds. The department
would have to consult with the regional planning team,
demonstrate a significant contribution to the common
property fisheries, operate the hatchery in a manner
beneficial to the public interest and be financially viable.
Representative Hanley noted that the Commissioner is being
given the authority to expand the program.
(Tape Change, HFC 94-134, Side 2)
Representative Hanley noted that the excess funds will not
be available for use as general fund dollars. Representative
Navarre maintained that the legislature can control
approprition to the loan fund on an annual basis.
There being NO OBJECTION, the Committee's action in failing
to adopt Amendment 1 was RESCINDED. Co-Chair MacLean MOVED
to ADOPT AMENDMENT 1. Representative Hanley OBJECTED. A roll
call vote was taken on the motion
IN FAVOR: Martin, Navarre, Brown, Grussendorf, Larson,
MacLean
OPPOSED: Hanley, Therriault, Parnell, Foster
Representative Hoffman was not present for the vote.
The MOTION PASSED (6-4).
Representative Hanley MOVED to report HCS CSSB 251 (FIN) out
of Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
HCS CSSB 251 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with "no
recommendation" and with a zero fiscal note by the
Department of Commerce and Economic Development, DATED
2/18/94.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|