Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/31/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing Legislative Ethics Committee | |
| SJR28 | |
| HB101 | |
| SB190 | |
| HB108 | |
| SB249 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 249 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 28 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 249-PUBLIC RECORDS/ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONS
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 249.
2:51:24 PM
MAX HENSLEY, Staff to Senator Johnny Ellis, sponsor of SB 249,
said the bill strengthens and clarifies existing law regarding
access to and preservation of public records. The sponsor
statement includes a quote from the Organic Act of 1913 that
says that every person has a right to inspect any public record
and every public officer that has custody thereof, is bound to
permit an inspection. SB 249 updates the statute while
maintaining that strong intent.
MR. HENSLEY said the bill makes four major changes. First, it
provides a consistent definition of a public record in the three
places it's specifically mentioned in the statutes - maintenance
of records by state agencies; access to records by the public;
and the criminal statutes for tampering with public records.
Second, the definition is consistently broad and explicitly
includes electronic transmissions within the definition and
explains that impeding the preservation of or access to public
records is a violation of existing criminal law. Third, it
amends the Executive Branch Ethics Act to require public
officers to use state email when taking official action. The
current administration supports this recognizing that items that
don't travel through state systems cannot be maintained as
public records. The final major change limits the fees that the
state can charge for access to public records to the actual cost
to duplicate those records. The actual cost does not include
labor because state employees are already being paid and as such
are part of the state budget. This same definition is used by 14
other states nationwide.
2:54:41 PM
MR. HENSLEY said the previous committee asked for a definition
for "public officer" and for "official action" with respect to
the requirement in Section 2 for public officers to use state
email for official action. Both those terms are defined within
that same section of statute. "Official action" means "advice,
participation or assistance, including a recommendation
decision, approval/disapproval vote, or other similar action,
including inaction, by public officers." "Public officer"
includes the governor, lieutenant governor, department heads or
deputies, division directors or deputies, special assistants,
legislative liaisons, assistants to the governor and lieutenant
governor, board and commission members, comptrollers,
procurement officers, executive directors, and members of the
Board of Trustees and investment officers of the Permanent Fund
Corporation and appointed or elected municipal officers. It
includes the people who might have a direct impact on public
policy, not every state employee.
CHAIR FRENCH asked what the remedy would be if a public officer
under Section 2 does not use a state electronic delivery system
for their electronic transmissions.
MR. HENSLEY said it would be an ethics violation under the
Executive Branch Ethics Act. Section 6 specifies that it's a
criminal violation, but it hasn't been tested.
2:58:15 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced he would hold SB 249 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|