Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/25/1996 03:38 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 247 USE OF FISH & GAME FUND/COMM'R'S POWERS
CHAIRMAN LEMAN brought SB 247 before the committee as the final
order of business. It was noted there was a Resources CS for the
committee's consideration.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved the adoption of CSSB 247(RES), version "F," as
a working document. Hearing no objection, the motion carried.
SENATOR TAYLOR , the legislation's prime sponsor, said the primary
purpose of the bill is to constrain the department in the
utilization of funds that are derived from the user public. He
said receipts from specific taxes imposed on those people have
become the primary budget of all of the Department of Fish and
Game, with the exception of the Division of Commercial Fisheries.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved the following amendment to CSSB 247(RES)
Amendment No. 1
Page 2, line 8: Delete "or"
Page 2, line 13: Following "tags;" insert "or
(D) construction and protection of shooting
ranges;"
Page 3, line 27: Delete "or"
Page 4, line 1: Following "tags;" insert "or
(D) construction and protection of shooting ranges;"
SENATOR HOFFMAN objected to the adoption of the amendment.
SENATOR TAYLOR , speaking to the amendment to CSSB 247(RES), said
rifle ranges seem to be coming under greater and greater attack all
across the state, and it was felt that since it is one specific
funding mechanism that is provided for in federal fund it should be
in the bill to make certain those shooting and rifle ranges
continue to exist. He said the amendment contains the phrase
"construction and protection of shooting ranges," but he thought
replacing the word "protection" with the word "preservation" would
be more suitable because it would allow the upgrade and improvement
of the shooting range.
TAPE 96-36, SIDE A
Number 010
SENATOR TAYLOR moved as an amendment to the amendment to replace
the word "protection" with "preservation." Hearing no objection,
the Chairman stated the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
CHAIRMAN LEMAN stated Amendment No. 1, as amended, was before the
committee. Hearing no objection, he stated the amendment was
adopted.
CHAIRMAN LEMAN noted that at the previous hearing on the bill, Jeff
Parker expressed concern that because the legislation included
sport fish stocks that it would result in the loss of federal
revenues, and he had suggested that the references to fish be
deleted and the bill just refer to wildlife. He questioned if that
is a valid concern, and said it was not his intent that that
happen.
SENATOR TAYLOR said he thinks a good portion of the monies received
from the federal government is specifically allocated to sport fish
to enhance access for sport and recreational fisheries, and he
thinks Mr. Parker is incorrect that federal funds will be lost. In
fact he thinks the way the department has been operating, they were
running a risk of losing some federal funds should an audit reveal
that they were using them for commercial hatchery type operations
instead of sport fish.
GERON BRUCE , Legislative Liaison, Alaska Department of Fish & Game,
said he thought Mr. Parker had a valid concern. He pointed out the
fiscal notes prepared by the department showed a reversion of
federal funds to the federal government. They do not believe that
under the original version of the bill that the purposes for which
those funds are authorized to be spent would be broad enough to
include many of the things that they do and are vital to their
sport fish and recreational hunting management programs. He also
said the problem is not with the federal law and regulations; the
problem will be with this proposed state law.
SENATOR LINCOLN said she would be interested in knowing how much
money the department believes the state would be losing in federal
dollars.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved CSSB 247(RES), as amended, and the
accompanying fiscal notes be passed out of committee with
individual recommendations. SENATOR HOFFMAN objected, stating that
as a hunter and fisherman, he does not see a problem with of the
way the dollars are being spent by the Department of Fish and Game.
The roll was taken with the following result: Senator Taylor,
Halford, Pearce and Leman voted "Yea" and Senators Hoffman and
Lincoln voted "Nay." The Chairman stated the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|