Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/08/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB60 | |
| SB210 | |
| SB246 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 246 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SJR 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 60 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 246-INCREASING NUMBER OF SUPERIOR CT JUDGES
2:36:20 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 246.
DOUG WOOLIVER, Administrative Attorney, Alaska Court System,
said that SB 246 adds one superior court judge to the Third
Judicial District. That judge will be located in Anchorage and
will handle civil cases. He explained that this change requires
a bill because the number of superior court judges is determined
in statute.
MR. WOOLIVER said the court could justify three more superior
court judges in Anchorage, but they hope to make some procedural
reforms so that one additional judge will suffice, at least for
this year. He related that a couple of case types, not
additional filings, have resulted in increased workload for
superior court judges. These are child in need of aid (CINA)
cases and cases where one or both parties are unrepresented by
counsel. Judges are spending more time on CINA cases now because
standing masters are doing less work. Previously, a CINA case
would come to a standing master and proceed through the master
until it was a contested hearing in which case it would be sent
to a superior court judge temporarily and then back to the
master. That system saved judge time but it sent families
bouncing back and forth between one judge and the master then
another judge and the master. Superior court judges have the
ultimate authority to make decisions in CINA cases, but the
judge wasn't always familiar with the case. More frequently, the
family wasn't familiar with the judge that was deciding the
case. The new practice in Anchorage takes more time for superior
court judges even though the cases don't take longer. Superior
court judges are spending more time on these cases, which is
better for the families and the outcome of the case.
MR. WOOLIVER said that CINA cases also have more status hearings
than in the past. The way the process works now is that families
are told all the things they have to do in order to get their
children back. Judges found, largely through the therapeutic
court process, that regular status hearings before a judge keep
families focused on what they need to do and the judge informed
about their progress. This increases the likelihood that the
family will be reunited. These two things are keeping superior
court judges busier.
2:39:56 PM
MR. WOOLIVER said that the other case type that causes more work
for judges is when parties are unrepresented. In divorce cases
about 80 percent of people are unrepresented in all post decree
motion work. When domestic relations cases are first filed about
37 percent have counsel on both sides, 37 percent have no
counsel on either side, and about 25 percent have counsel on one
side but not the other. The court has taken steps to make it
easier for people who can't afford a lawyer to access the court
system, but that takes more time. By making it easier for pro se
litigants, particularly with the Family Law Self-Help Center,
more people go to court unrepresented.
Adding one superior court judge will help the workload somewhat,
but the court is also looking at less expensive ways to improve
the system so it doesn't have to ask for more than one
additional judge, he said.
2:42:31 PM
SENATOR COGHILL asked if therapeutic courts are similarly time
consuming or if these cases are on a different level.
MR. WOOLIVER replied they're a little different. In the
therapeutic court process it takes a lot of time during the 18
month program, but the hope is that it won't take time in the
future. In contrast, custody cases can be before the court for
18 years. The therapeutic approach with CINA cases doesn't save
time, but hopefully better decisions are made increasing the
likelihood that parents will get their act together and they'll
get their kids back.
2:44:26 PM
THERESA OBERMEYER, representing herself, said she was motivated
to testify when she learned that SB 246 is about creating more
judgeships. "It's fine with me, but I know this - it's all
becoming so bureaucratic," she concluded.
CHAIR FRENCH held SB 246 in committee.
2:50:38 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair French adjourned the meeting at 2:50 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR21 sponsor statement.pdf |
SFIN 3/15/2010 9:00:00 AM SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 21 |
| SJR 21 Population Trend 2010 districts.pdf |
SFIN 3/15/2010 9:00:00 AM SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 21 |
| Alaska Supreme Court. redistricting.pdf |
SFIN 3/15/2010 9:00:00 AM SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 21 |
| SB 210 Sponsor Statement - Military Child Custody.doc |
SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 210 |
| Resolution 106.pdf |
SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 210 |
| NAUS Military Divorce Rate Continues to Climb.docx |
SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 210 |
| Custody Map (10-23).ppt |
SJUD 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 210 |