Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/07/2002 01:35 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 244-OPTOMETRISTS: SUNSET AND MISCELLANEOUS
CHAIRMAN BEN STEVENS called the Senate Labor & Commerce Committee
meeting to order at 1:35 p.m. and announced SB 244 to be up for
consideration.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN moved to adopt CSSB 244 (L&C), 22-LS1267\C,
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
MS. HEATHER BRAKES, Staff to Senator Therriault, Chairman of the
Budget and Audit Committee and sponsor of SB 244, explained the
changes in the committee substitute. Section 2 implements
recommendation #4 of the Audit Report eliminating reference to
the state exam and mandates an exam designed to test the
applicants' knowledge of Alaska's law in optometry.
Section 3 addresses recommendation #2 of the Audit, implementing
full licensure by credentials with requirements acceptable to the
Board, such as education, current licensure, active clinical
practice and no pending disciplinary actions in another
jurisdiction.
Section 4 has no changes from the previous hearing.
She worked on this language with the Legislative Auditor,
Director of Occupational Licensing and Dr. Christianson on the
Board of Examiners and Optometry.
DR. CHRISTIANSON said the Board could live with this language.
SENATOR DAVIS moved to adopt amendment #1 which inserts: "The
department may require the applicant to submit a photograph of
the applicant for its files, however the photograph may not be
forwarded with the application to the board for review."
SENATOR LEMAN commented:
I think we're making much ado about nothing…If someone
comes into an office and interviews for a job, you see
what they look like. You see a person. I don't know
where the thought is coming from, that somebody has
this idea and this amendment is sort of propagating it,
that if we see what somebody looks like, then we might
discriminate against them. Maybe because I don't think
that way, I don't know why others are so concerned
about it, but maybe this is a problem in the workplace.
I don't know.
SENATOR DAVIS stated:
When we received this package, it was recommended that
it not be in there at all. Upon your amendment, it was
taken out. I feel that it should be changed. I was the
only one that felt that it should have stayed the way
it was and I was willing to bring back this amendment
this way rather than do it somewhere else. Because I
see that there's nothing wrong with this going in there
that way. I don't know if somebody is going to
discriminate or not discriminate, but they could. And
even though you might not feel that way doesn't mean
that everybody else feels that way. I didn't say that
you took it out because you were discriminating
against. I felt that what you did was making an ado
about nothing when you three men voted to take it out,
but since I was in the minority, you had the vote; it
came out. So, now I'm bringing it back in a different
manner. You would still have a picture there so a
person could be identified when they get ready to take
the test. Somebody can identify who they are. I fill
out applications all the time and nobody has asked me
to give a picture. So, what's so good about having that
stuck in here. Around the nation they're not doing it.
The National Board does not recommend that that be in
there. So we're doing something over and above what the
National Board wants. I take exception to the fact that
you would say that I'm making much ado about nothing,
because I could say the very same thing when you made
the motion last week.
SENATOR LEMAN responded: "You just proved my point."
CHAIRMAN STEVENS asked if there were any further objections.
There were no objections and amendment #1 was adopted.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN moved to pass CSSB 244 (L&C) from committee
with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it
was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|