Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/15/2010 08:30 AM House FINANCE
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 32 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 139 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 159 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 172 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 220 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 234 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 243 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 258 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 266 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 279 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 312 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 305 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 243(FIN)
"An Act relating to geothermal resources; relating to
the royalty obligation for geothermal resources;
transferring from the Department of Natural Resources
to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
authority over permitting and inspection of geothermal
wells; providing for a regulatory cost charge for
geothermal wells; and providing for an effective
date."
2:11:10 PM
SENATOR LESIL MCGUIRE, SPONSOR, discussed the policy
changes made regarding geothermal resources. She explained
that geothermal harnesses energy from the heat in the
earth's core. Alaska provides good geothermal
opportunities. The bill reflects on a royalty rate for
geothermal energy allowing investors to take advantage of
the rate. She explained the 10 percent royalty rate was
established for geothermal energy 26 years ago. The rate
was deduced to be a placeholder alongside hydrocarbons
before a true understanding of geothermal potential
existed.
2:15:17 PM
Senator McGuire stressed that the value of the land leased
from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) does convey
a use and a royalty is therefore deserved. The bill sets a
rate commiserate of 1.57 percent of gross revenues derived
from production, sale, or use of geothermal resources for
the first ten years, which is the federal rate. The next
ten years will require 3.5 percent of the gross income. In
crafting the bill, a competitive rate was desired. The goal
was a rate that was not higher than the federal government
which might disincentivize investment on state land.
Senator McGuire remarked on the importance of the second
part of the bill. She explored the history of a company
called Naknek Electric who began drilling in Pikes Ridge
leading to research of the topic by a commissioner of the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC).
Findings were that the seismic and the geological data had
not been analyzed in a method consistent to that of
hydrocarbon drilling leading to new methods that better
protect workers and the resource. The statutory fix
proposed in SB 243 is a result of this work between AOGCC
and DNR. The bill states that AOGCC will assume
responsibility for regulating the conservation of a
geothermal resource to prevent waste. She added that DNR
will oversee leasing, unitization, and general land
management.
2:19:19 PM
Senator McGuire expressed enthusiasm for state resources
including geothermal.
Co-Chair Hawker acknowledged that the state did not have a
regulatory structure related to geothermal energy. He
commended the work done on the legislation.
MICHAEL PAWLOWSKI, STAFF, SENATOR LESIL MCGUIRE, provided a
sectional for the bill.
Section 1 amends AS 31.05.030 clarifying that the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
(AOGCC) has jurisdiction over the exploration
and development of geothermal resources;
except for the management of leases and
units.
Section 2 amends the royalty rate for geothermal
resources in AS 38.05.181(g) to reflect
federal royalty rates; 1.75% of gross income
during the first 10 years and 3.5% of gross
income thereafter.
Section 3 adds a new section to AS 41.06 delineating
jurisdiction over geothermal resources
between the AOGCC and Department of Natural
Resources (DNR).
Section 4 amends AS 41.06.010 to allow the AOGCC to
investigate the waste of geothermal
resources.
Section 5 repeals and reenacts AS 41.06.020 to set out
the jurisdiction of the AOGCC over all land
in the state and to allow for the suspension
of the application of chapter 06 on federal
land if similarly regulated by Federal
government and clarifies the application of
the chapter.
Section 6 amends AS 41.06.030(a) to clarify that a plan
of development and operation for a geothermal
resource must be filed with the AOGCC.
Section 7 amends AS 41.06.030(b) to clarify that
unitization by DNR of a geothermal resource
system under AS 41.06.030 when the geothermal
resource system includes state land.
Section 8 amends AS 41.06.030(c) to conform to the
changes made in section 7.
Section 9 amends AS 41.06.030 by inserting a new
subsection (e) that allows the commissioner
of DNR to adopt regulations necessary to
implement the purposes and intent of chapter
6.
Section 10 amends AS 41.06 by adding a new section
41.06.035 allowing the AOGCC to issue orders
and impose requirements to prevent waste and
protect correlative rights on any geothermal
operation. This section also allows the
AOGCC to adopt regulations.
Section 11 repeals and reenacts AS 41.06.040(a)
governing the authority of the AOGCC to adopt
regulations governing the safe development of
a geothermal resource.
Section 12 amends AS 41.06.040 (b) to allow the AOGCC
to require a geothermal operator to file a
surety bond.
Section 13 amends AS 41.06.040(c) to require
notification of the AOGCC rather than the DNR
is geothermal exploration encounters
hydrocarbons and other fissionable materials.
Section 14 amends AS 41.06.040(d) to replace the
commissioner of DNR with the AOGCC for the
purposes of authorizing inspection of a
geothermal operation.
Section 15 repeals and reenacts AS 41.06.050 governing
the AOGCC permitting process for geothermal
exploration and development drilling.
Section 16 amends AS 41.06 by adding a new section
41.06.055 authorizing a regulatory cost
charge for geothermal wells.
Section 17 repeals and reenacts AS 41.06.060 providing
definitions for AS 41.06
Section 18 repeals AS 41.06.030(d) governing lease
operations under an approved plan of
development and AS 41.06.040(e) the exemption
from AOGCC authority of geothermal resources.
Section 19 adds a new section to the uncodified law of
the State of Alaska that applies the royalty
rates established by section 2 to leases
entered into or renewed after the effective
date of the act and directs the commissioner
of DNR to offer the royalty rates established
by section 2 to an existing lessee.
Section 20 adds a new section to the uncodified law of
the State of Alaska that governs the
transition of authorities over geothermal
resources established in this act.
Section 21 adds a new section to the uncodified law of
the State of Alaska that gives direction to
the revisor of statutes.
Section 22 immediate effective date for section 20
Section 23 effective date of July 1, 2010
2:26:46 PM
Vice-Chair Thomas asked about Section 13. He wondered if a
company struck hydrocarbons, would they stop drilling for
water. Mr. Pawlowski responded that the quantity of
hydrocarbons is often the deciding factor. If hydrocarbons
are found, it is important that AOGCC knows, because the
weight of the mud used in the drilling operations is
important.
Vice-Chair Thomas imagined that the royalty rate would
change.
Representative Foster remarked on discussions about
development of the Pilgrim Hot Springs north of Nome. With
the springs existing on private versus state land, he
wondered if the royalties will apply.
Mr. Pawlowski pointed out Page 2 Line 25, which explains
that the authority of the commission to regulate geothermal
extends to all land in the state, including private,
municipal, and state land. The regulation of the operation
would remain the same, but the royalty rates would not
apply.
2:30:47 PM
KEVIN BANKS, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF OIL & GAS, DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES (via teleconference), addressed the
question about geothermal found on private land. He agreed
that all of the statutory authorities drafted in the bill
are already in place. The bill removes authority given to
DNR and transferred them to AOGCC who has the staff for
management and safety.
Mr. Banks responded to the question regarding oil found
during an attempt to drill for geothermal. He stated that
if the oil is on state land, a discussion about the lease
must occur. The leases provided are either for oil or
geothermal, but not both. If oil was found, it would not be
complicated to issue an oil or gas lease allowing the state
to receive the appropriate royalties. On private land, the
owner would communicate the changes.
Mr. Banks replied to the question concerning changes in the
royalty, he stated that "something is better than nothing."
He stated that a royalty rate of 1.75 percent for the first
ten years, rising to 3.5 for the second ten years, makes
private land competitive with federal land.
2:34:05 PM
Representative Gara pointed out the definition of
geothermal, which is divided into "geothermal fluid" and
geothermal resources." He wished to ensure that the
definition in the bill did not inadvertently include other
valuable resources. He requested a list of other possible
exemptions. He asked if the definition of geothermal was
clear enough to avoid the loss of royalties.
Mr. Banks replied that the bill expands the definition of
geothermal. The current statutes have a limit of 120
degrees Celsius increasing the likelihood that electricity
could be created with a geothermal resource less than 120
degrees. The addition of the commercial use provision,
defined as sales of power, heat to a third party lead to
access to those types of resources.
Representative Gara reiterated concerns about inadvertently
lowering the royalty on oil, gas, minerals, or gold.
Mr. Banks assured that the language applies only to heat or
hot liquids
Vice-Chair Thomas queried the lease rate when hydrocarbons
were discovered when drilling for geothermal. Mr. Banks
explained hypothetically that if a driller does not have an
oil and gas lease; when drilling on public land for
geothermal, the driller is governed by the geothermal
lease. The company would not be permitted to produce the
oil and gas. The department would be summoned to form an
oil and gas lease with either a competitive process or a
decision made by the commissioner. He pointed out that if
oil and gas is found, the company is tapping into a
resource that requires a separate lease.
2:38:40 PM
CATHY FOERSTER, ENGINEERING COMMISSIONER, ALASKA OIL AND
GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
(via teleconference), explained that the royalties portion
of the bill does not affect the AOGCC. The important
sections are those that transfer some but not all
authorities from the DNR to the AOGCC. The authorities
transferred are those that regulate drilling and production
operations, protect correlative, prevent fiscal waste of
the resource, and protect the fresh ground water. The DNR
will retain pertaining authorities.
Ms. Foerster stressed the importance of AOGCC's expertise,
which allows them to take on the additional authorities.
She announced the experienced drilling engineers who
approve the permits ensuring safety and good operational
practices. She also mentioned the experienced field
inspectors who competently test equipment to ensure that it
works properly. The transfer of authority requires no
fiscal impact. If the bill does not pass, a cost to allow
the DNR to contract the necessary expertise will require
state funding.
Co-Chair Hawker asked if adequate regulatory authority is
drafted into the legislation. Ms. Foerster replied the
legislation provides everything needed by AOGCC.
Co-Chair Hawker closed public testimony.
Mr. Pawlowski described three fiscal notes. The first is a
zero fiscal note from DNR. The second fiscal note is from
AOGCC under the Department of Administration (DOA) and also
has zero fiscal impact. The third zero fiscal note is from
the Department of Revenue (DOR). All three of the fiscal
notes have positive revenue potential for the state.
2:44:23 PM
Co-Chair Hawker explained that the action of creating the
regulatory structure does not lead to a financial
consequence for the state, with the state hoping for
positive numbers. Mr. Pawlowski agreed.
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report CSSB 243(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
HCS CSSB 243(RES) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with attached previously published
fiscal notes: FN2 (REV), FN3 (DNR, FN4 (ADM).
2:49:23 PM AT EASE
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| K version CE Workdraft.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
CS WORKDRAFT Kversion SB 305 SB 305 |
| Summary of Changes to SC workdraft K SB 305.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| sb13_2009 summary 3-9-09[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 13 |
| SB 13 - Sponsor Statement 2-10-09 (H)FIN.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 13 |
| SB 13 Sectional Summary 26-LS0076A (H)FIN.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 13 |
| CS SB 83 (L&C) section analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 83 Gov Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| Explanation of Changes between SB 83 and CSSB 83.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB139 Sponsor Statement Revised.PDF |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB 139 Data Health Care Professions Loan Repayment Program Concept Proposal.PDF |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB 159 Sponsor Statement H FIN.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 159 |
| SB172 Sectional.PDF |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 172 |
| SB172 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 172 |
| Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 174 |
| Changes to SB 220 in SB 220 FIN[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 220 |
| Sectional on SB 220, version Y.doc |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 220 |
| Sponsor Statement for SB 220.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 220 |
| HCS CSSB 234 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 234 |
| Summary of Changes to HCS CSSB 234.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 234 |
| Sponsor Statement[1] SB 258.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 258 |
| Support Documents[1] SB258.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 258 |
| Sponsor Statement - SB 266.doc |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 266 |
| HCS for CS for SB 279_LC_ Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 279 |
| SB 279 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 279 |
| SB 279 Back-Up.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 279 |
| 2010 04 12 SB312 Port of Call Payments.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/14/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 312 |
| SB 312 Sectional Analysis.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/5/2010 10:00:00 AM |
SB 312 |
| SB 312 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/5/2010 10:00:00 AM |
SB 312 |
| SB 305 SECTIONAL for CS.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB305 sponsor statement.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| HCS CSSB305(RES)(title am)-REV-TAX-04-13-10 decoupling.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| 2010 04 15 Historical Rev Distribution 3Yrs.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 312 |
| 2010 03 02 D Wood Calculations FY2008_09.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
|
| SB 13 Support Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 13 |
| SB 220 Amendments #2 3 4.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 220 |
| SB 305 Amendment Hawker.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB 172 Amendment #1 Hawker.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 172 |
| Sponsor Statement 243.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
|
| Corrected Sectional Analysis Sb 243 version P.docx |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 243 |
| H FIN Comments on SB 305 4-15-10 FINAL.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| Qualifying For the AGIA Tax Inducement - H FIN 4-15-10.pdf |
HFIN 4/15/2010 8:30:00 AM |