Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/11/2000 09:05 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 240(L&C)
"An Act relating to the establishment of and
accounting for an administrative cost charge for the
state's role in the community development quota
program and to the appropriation of receipts from the
charge; and providing for an effective date."
GREG CASHEN, Community Development Quota (CDQ) Specialist,
Community Development Quota, Department of Community and
Economic Development stated that this legislation allowed
CDQ groups that participate in this program to pay
assessment fees to the state. He continued that the
proposed fee schedule has two components, the first being a
standard flat amount paid by each group totaling half the
state's administrative costs. He noted that the other
half, also paid by this group, would be a variable portion
of the administrative costs based on the value of this
group's fishery quota allocation. He stated that the
Department of Community and Economic Development would
administer the cost charge added to the statutory list of
program receipts subject to separate accounting procedures.
He noted that each CDQ group supports this legislation. He
outlined the differences of this version versus the
companion HB 334. He added that the exemption in the house
bill would allow for new CDQ groups into the program
without paying fees for up to two years. He cited that
this exemption was taken out of the House version,
including a $400,000 cap that was deleted as well.
Co-Chair Parnell referred to the exemption mentioned by Mr.
Cashen and wondered if it was the one noted on page 3,
lines 10 - 13. He read this clause and wondered what the
policy reason was behind leaving this exemption in place.
Mr. Cashen responded that a Northern Alaska constituency
put this exemption forth.
Senator Adams added that this group was out of Kotzebue,
which is trying to start a new CDQ group, which explained
this exemption language.
Co-Chair Parnell asked if this group needed this exemption
from an economic perspective in order to help with start up
costs.
Senator Adams responded that this group was having a hard
time getting started and a federal initiative would be
needed in order to change the existing bond situation.
Co-Chair Torgerson asked how much money was involved with
this exemption.
Mr. Cashen responded that this standard portion would total
$125,000 divided between six CDQ groups.
Co-Chair Torgerson noted that this bill would be set aside,
and added that the companion house bill had been amended
into another bill on the House floor. He would hold this
version in Committee until the House bill catches up to SB
240 in the referral system. SB 240 was HELD IN COMMITTEE.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|