Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/16/2002 01:38 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 238-PUBLIC RECORDS: STATE SECURITY & SAFETY
CHAIRMAN JOHN COWDERY called the Senate Transportation Committee
meeting to order at 1:38 p.m. and announced SB 238 to be up for
consideration. Senators Ward, Elton, Wilken and Cowdery were
present.
MS. CAROL CARROLL, Department of Military and Veterans, said that
Deborah Behr from the Department of Law would testify with her.
MS. CARROLL said that SB 238 addresses state security and safety
plans and procedures. She explained that Section 2 deals with
exceptions to Alaska's public records statute. Currently,
Alaska's public records statute is quite broad; most state
information is available to the public. Section 2 will allow
state agencies to withhold certain documents in certain
circumstances. Section 3 pertains to the Administrative
Procedures Act and allows plans to be adopted by Executive Order
instead of by regulation, which requires public comment.
CHAIRMAN COWDERY asked her to explain the changes made in the
Senate State Affairs committee substitute.
MS. CARROLL responded that the original bill had a section that
allowed the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
(DOTPF) to have citation authority in international and rural
airports. [Ms. Carroll's next statement was indiscernible.]
Currently, the FAA can fine the states for security violations at
international airports. There is no easy way for the state to
pass that on to the actual violator so the State Affairs
Committee took that out of the bill. In addition, Section 3 was
tightened up. Section 3 used to apply to boards and commissions
but the Senate State Affairs Committee thought that was too
broad.
CHAIRMAN COWDERY asked her to explain the type of information
they are talking about.
MS. DEBORAH BEHR, Regulations Attorney, Department of Law, told
members that she is before the committee because she frequently
advises state agencies on the public records act. She stated that
Section 1 of the bill is designed to deal with a very narrow set
of state records that deal with security plans, programs,
procedures and detailed descriptions of state infrastructure. She
explained:
It allows those records, which arguably could be
disclosed to the public, to be exempted from public
disclosure. Just because something is a security plan,
it doesn't automatically mean that a state agency can
preclude its release into the public. We have to show
that the disclosure would interfere with its
implementation or that it would disclose confidential
guidelines or would cause a substantial risk to the
public to do so. The privilege in the bill is very
similar to what law enforcement privileges are to law
enforcement officers. The federal Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) has a national defense exception
to it. We do not have a similar exemption in the state
statute. People who believe that a state agency has
unjustifiably withheld a record can ask for an
administrative appeal on the issue and then ultimately
go to court if they need to.
CHAIRMAN COWDERY asked her to give an example of the kind of
information that would be undesirable to be made public.
MS. BEHR replied that an example might be a security system for a
state building in which people wearing red badges on a certain
day of the week were considered law enforcement officers and were
not subject to the same level of search as the general public. In
that case, the badge color of the day would not be disclosed to
the general public.
There being no further discussion, SENATOR ELTON moved to pass
CSSB 238(STA) with the attached zero fiscal note from committee.
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|