Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/01/1998 10:05 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 234
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Governors of the Alaska Bar Association."
Senator Adams moved for adoption of the CS for SB 234.
Senator Pearce announced that she was not going to offer
that version because it was not what was discussed at the
subcommittee meeting. In her opinion, the Drafter
misunderstood the intent of the subcommittee and therefore
Version E of the Workdraft was not what was discussed.
Senator Adams removed his motion.
Senator Donley moved to amend SB 234, Line 6 to change the
number "2002" to "2000". Senator Adams objected. His
reason was because of the recommendation of the Auditor
suggesting the date extend the sunset date out to six years.
He wanted to know why the request was now being made to
reduce the date to two years.
Senator Donley responded saying there was a continuing
question on the Bar Association's carry-over of
approximately $1 million. As it related to its budget
expenditures, he felt it was important to review this again
after a couple of years. With that, Senator Adams removed
his objection.
Senator Donley noted on the record that he was a member of
the Alaska Bar Association, but didn't feel that constituted
a conflict of interest. Senator Parnell noted the same.
Co-Chair Sharp ruled there was no conflict of interest and
that they would both be required to vote on this
legislation.
There was no objection to Amendment #1, and Co-Chair Sharp
ordered it adopted.
DAVID BUNDY testified on behalf of the Alaska Bar
Association to the bill. He told the committee he was
surprised to see there was a desire to move the sunset date
up to two years. He spoke of the surplus of funds and said
it had been the association's position from the beginning
that they did not operate on state funds. They did their
best to manage their funds economically and efficiently, he
said. They planned their budgeting out well beyond two
years from now, which had been summarized in the audit. He
said he didn't see any reason that would change. It would
be an expensive process for everybody to go through. He
felt it would be unnecessary to through this again when
there was no prospect that things would be significantly
altered from what they were now.
This concluded public testimony on SB 234.
Senator Pearce spoke of the subcommittee conversation
talking about the fact that the vote to elect members of the
board of the ABA should be done by mail, which was already
done. The discussion then centered on voting for the
officers of the association and the requirement of members
of the bar to be in attendance at the annual convention to
participate in the officer election. Senator Pearce talked
about the distribution of area and population in
representation. This system would bring diversion to the
board, by rotating the residency of the presidency even
though Anchorage has the highest percentage of attorney
seats on the board.
She added that the professional dues charged by the ABA were
higher than charged by most other professional associations
in the state. Many attorneys contacted her office saying
that they didn't like the high dues, but the public didn't
know much about the ABA. She wanted the ABA to understand
that other states have taken steps to reduce the dues
charged in their state. (Further conversation was illegible
due to a microphone malfunction.) Bar expenses were
certainly higher than other professional dues, she said.
Whether the two-year extension would well serve the public,
she wasn't sure. The ABA treated what they did internally
different than most other professional licensing boards.
Mr. Bundy requested an opportunity to respond to Senator
Pearce's comments. He quantified that he was unable to hear
her entire discussion because the teleconference was broken
up. He didn't think it was fair to characterize the bar
association as not concerned by what the Legislature felt.
They took an extensive amount of time to respond to Senator
Donley's earlier questions, he argued. He said they were
interested in input from anyone with an opinion in the
organization. We certainly listen to members and their
opinions he stressed.
Mr. Bundy defended the level of dues charged by the bar.
Their research indicated that considering the functions the
bar performed, both admissions and discipline of attorneys
and continuing legal education, and that they got no state
subsidy, the dues were not higher than other states that
performed similar duties. Other states had discipline
administered by the Supreme Court as a state function, or
done on a volunteer basis instead of paid council, which he
said was another way of getting a state subsidy for the bar.
In his view, it was not accurate to say Alaska lawyers paid
more than any where else therefore it must be too high. The
organization did a great deal of research to verify that and
the information was available for interested parties, he
offered. He wanted to make sure his comments were noted on
that point.
Senator Adams offered an amendment on Page 1 Line 8 to add:
"Any Alaskan that fails the Alaskan Bar license test after
25 tries is automatically a lawyer and must be President of
the Bar Association and pays no dues." Senator Adams then
told the committee that this was his APRIL FOOLS JOKE, and
withdrew the amendment. (Laughter)
Senator Adams moved Senate Finance Committee Substitute for
SB 234 out of committee with individual recommendations.
There was no objection, and Co-Chair Sharp so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|