Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/08/1998 01:40 PM Senate JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 232 - ELECTRONIC RECORDS; RECORD REQUIREMENTS SENATOR PARNELL, prime sponsor of SB 232, explained that this bill establishes electronic signatures as a legal practice with the same standing as a standard signature and allows the Lt. Governor or another state agency to promulgate regulations for using electronic signatures by private and public entities. The bill also establishes criteria for electronic signature regulations and repeals some state agencies' selective notarization requirements to better utilize the efficiencies of electronic signatures. SENATOR PARNELL said the bill will allow such practical applications as filing articles of incorporation or dissolution or articles of merger, etc. using electronically transmitted signatures. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked who benefits from this and SENATOR PARNELL replied both public and private industry will benefit by allowing the use of electronic signatures, as well as state agencies. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if this included all corporate officers and SENATOR PARNELL replied it did. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked why the penalty was being changed from "verified and under oath" to one of "unsworn falsification." SENATOR PARNELL suggested that MR. ANDY KLINE, staff to Lt. Governor Fran Ulmer might be better able to answer that. MR. KLINE came forward and explained the idea behind the change is that an oath is something sworn in person, involving writing. He said this is the same penalty, applied in an electronic format. SENATOR PARNELL offered an amendment on this point which ties the penalty for unsworn falsification to the precise criminal statutes it would fall under. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said the amendment takes care of one of his concerns. SENATOR PARNELL moved his amendment as amendment #1. Without objection, it was adopted. SENATOR PARNELL remarked that he had no opposition to the bill and the Department of Administration and the Lt. Governor both supported the bill. SENATOR PARNELL said he had a second amendment regarding certification of electronic signatures and asked MR. KLINE to explain it. MR. KLINE said the bill does not specify what type of technology will be used for electronic signatures, since this technology changes so rapidly. MR. KLINE said instead the sets out certain criteria that electronic signatures must meet. MR. KLINE explained that the way this works is there are two halves to an electronic signature: the public key and the private key. The two keys contain encrypted codes which must match for the signature to be authentic. The electronic signer keeps one key and the other is retained by the certifying authority. MR. KLINE indicated there are two ways to set up a certifying authority, either through the state or through the private sector. MR. KLINE said the amendment establishes that the certifying authority will be public in a private to private transaction. This will encourage businesses, typically banks, to come forward and act as certifying authorities. The amendment allows the state to be the certifying authority in any transactions in which the state is involved, permitting the state to go forward with the use of electronic signatures even if the private sector is not yet employing them. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he was concerned about hacking and the possibility that someone might break into the system and alter information. MR. KLINE said the bill does not set out any anti- hacking criteria. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR agreed, saying electronic signatures eliminate the third party witness currently required by law to prosecute crimes such as forgery. He said he would not have much comfort as a bank president under this bill. SENATOR PARNELL informed him that was part of the reason he wanted the state to act as a certifying authority. He said the bill enables the state to be the certifying authority and to set standards and protocols to prevent hacking. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked what would protect other transactions to which the state is not a party. Number 212 SENATOR PARNELL explained if CHAIRMAN TAYLOR would like the state to be the certification authority for all transactions, he should vote no on amendment #2. SENATOR PARNELL then moved amendment #2. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR objected. SENATOR ELLIS asked MR. KLINE what his position was on the amendment. ANDY KLINE indicated he supported the amendment. He added that he shares CHAIRMAN TAYLOR's concerns but explained that all the literature he has reviewed has indicated that these electronic signatures are secure and very verifiable. MR. KLINE says the bill does not specify the technology to be used, but only requires electronic signatures to meet the same criteria set out for written signatures. SENATOR PARNELL commented that another safeguard is the fact that it is very much in the interest of a private certification authority to ensure safeguards are in place to protect the validity of electronic signatures. MR. KLINE also mentioned that the bill is permissive, not restrictive, and simply allows the use of electronic signatures in addition to written signatures. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR called the roll on the amendment and voted against it. Both SENATOR ELLIS and SENATOR PARNELL voted in favor of the amendment. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR explained he has further concerns with the bill including state bank reporting requirements. SENATOR PARNELL moved the bill with individual recommendations but CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he'd rather hold it. The bill was held in committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|