Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/08/1998 01:40 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 232 - ELECTRONIC RECORDS; RECORD REQUIREMENTS
SENATOR PARNELL, prime sponsor of SB 232, explained that this bill
establishes electronic signatures as a legal practice with the same
standing as a standard signature and allows the Lt. Governor or
another state agency to promulgate regulations for using electronic
signatures by private and public entities. The bill also
establishes criteria for electronic signature regulations and
repeals some state agencies' selective notarization requirements to
better utilize the efficiencies of electronic signatures. SENATOR
PARNELL said the bill will allow such practical applications as
filing articles of incorporation or dissolution or articles of
merger, etc. using electronically transmitted signatures.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked who benefits from this and SENATOR PARNELL
replied both public and private industry will benefit by allowing
the use of electronic signatures, as well as state agencies.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if this included all corporate officers and
SENATOR PARNELL replied it did.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked why the penalty was being changed from
"verified and under oath" to one of "unsworn falsification."
SENATOR PARNELL suggested that MR. ANDY KLINE, staff to Lt.
Governor Fran Ulmer might be better able to answer that. MR. KLINE
came forward and explained the idea behind the change is that an
oath is something sworn in person, involving writing. He said this
is the same penalty, applied in an electronic format.
SENATOR PARNELL offered an amendment on this point which ties the
penalty for unsworn falsification to the precise criminal statutes
it would fall under. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said the amendment takes care
of one of his concerns.
SENATOR PARNELL moved his amendment as amendment #1. Without
objection, it was adopted. SENATOR PARNELL remarked that he had no
opposition to the bill and the Department of Administration and the
Lt. Governor both supported the bill.
SENATOR PARNELL said he had a second amendment regarding
certification of electronic signatures and asked MR. KLINE to
explain it. MR. KLINE said the bill does not specify what type of
technology will be used for electronic signatures, since this
technology changes so rapidly. MR. KLINE said instead the sets out
certain criteria that electronic signatures must meet.
MR. KLINE explained that the way this works is there are two halves
to an electronic signature: the public key and the private key. The
two keys contain encrypted codes which must match for the signature
to be authentic. The electronic signer keeps one key and the other
is retained by the certifying authority.
MR. KLINE indicated there are two ways to set up a certifying
authority, either through the state or through the private sector.
MR. KLINE said the amendment establishes that the certifying
authority will be public in a private to private transaction. This
will encourage businesses, typically banks, to come forward and act
as certifying authorities. The amendment allows the state to be the
certifying authority in any transactions in which the state is
involved, permitting the state to go forward with the use of
electronic signatures even if the private sector is not yet
employing them.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he was concerned about hacking and the
possibility that someone might break into the system and alter
information. MR. KLINE said the bill does not set out any anti-
hacking criteria. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR agreed, saying electronic
signatures eliminate the third party witness currently required by
law to prosecute crimes such as forgery. He said he would not have
much comfort as a bank president under this bill. SENATOR PARNELL
informed him that was part of the reason he wanted the state to act
as a certifying authority. He said the bill enables the state to be
the certifying authority and to set standards and protocols to
prevent hacking. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked what would protect other
transactions to which the state is not a party.
Number 212
SENATOR PARNELL explained if CHAIRMAN TAYLOR would like the state
to be the certification authority for all transactions, he should
vote no on amendment #2. SENATOR PARNELL then moved amendment #2.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR objected.
SENATOR ELLIS asked MR. KLINE what his position was on the
amendment. ANDY KLINE indicated he supported the amendment. He
added that he shares CHAIRMAN TAYLOR's concerns but explained that
all the literature he has reviewed has indicated that these
electronic signatures are secure and very verifiable. MR. KLINE
says the bill does not specify the technology to be used, but only
requires electronic signatures to meet the same criteria set out
for written signatures. SENATOR PARNELL commented that another
safeguard is the fact that it is very much in the interest of a
private certification authority to ensure safeguards are in place
to protect the validity of electronic signatures. MR. KLINE also
mentioned that the bill is permissive, not restrictive, and simply
allows the use of electronic signatures in addition to written
signatures.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR called the roll on the amendment and voted against
it. Both SENATOR ELLIS and SENATOR PARNELL voted in favor of the
amendment. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR explained he has further concerns with
the bill including state bank reporting requirements.
SENATOR PARNELL moved the bill with individual recommendations but
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he'd rather hold it. The bill was held in
committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|