Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/13/1996 01:33 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
STRA - 2/13/96
SB 226 MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION/EMISSIONS
Number 002
CHAIRMAN RIEGER called the Senate Transportation meeting to order
at 1:33 p.m. and introduced SB 226 as the first order of business
before the committee.
TOM WILLIAMS, Staff to Senator Frank, read the following sponsor
statement:
SB 226 requires motor vehicle registrations to be renewed once
every two years instead of annually. This will result in shorter
customer service lines at the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) by
reducing the necessity for as frequent public contact.
To help offset the burden of having to pay two years of fees at
once, this legislation gives the public a small registration fee
break. However, despite the small fee break to the public, the
state and those municipalities which have a motor vehicle
registration tax will receive additional one time revenue in the
year of implementation due to accelerated collections.
This legislation dovetails with DMV's current plans to convert to
biennial vehicle registration in Anchorage and Fairbanks and allows
DMV sufficient time to convert to a statewide biennial system!
I believe this is a good piece of legislation and encourage your
support.
Mr. Williams noted that the committee packets contained a sectional
analysis, an overview outline, and a summary of highlights. He
explained that the first schedule illustrated the projected vehicle
registration by utilizing the actual numbers in 1994 and 1995 while
the numbers for the years 1996 to 2002 are based on an annual
increase of three percent. The second schedule projects the cash
flow under the current fees. The third schedule shows the
projected cash flow with the new fees, assuming that the effective
date is July 1, 1997. There is a cash flow difference of $12.3
million between the total revenues with the new fees and the total
revenues with the old fees. There is a one time net cash flow
increase of $9.8 million.
Number 092
JUANITA HENSLEY, Chief of Driver's Services for DMV, said that the
department does support this concept. A biennial registration
program has been supported in previous years, but the annual
emissions testing in Anchorage and Fairbanks have been an obstacle
for the implementation of such a program. She said that a
voluntary biennual program is planned to begin in July. This would
benefit the people of Alaska.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER understood that biennial registration would become
mandatory after the transition period. JUANITA HENSLEY clarified
that SB 226 would mandate biennial registration whereas now it is
an initiative of DMV to voluntarily do biennial registration.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if there would be a refund of any portion of
the registration fee, if a vehicle leaves the state or is involved
in a car accident. JUANITA HENSLEY replied no.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER pointed out that this analysis may fail to capture
the unused registration fee. Under the old system, a car that was
totalled in an accident or owned by a person who moved to another
state would leave the remaining months of registration fee. Under
the new system those free months of registration fee would be
increased. That must happen frequently. Chairman Rieger stated
that all of the fiscal impacts must then be understated. Biennial
registration may be more revenue generating than the information
suggests. Was that factored into the analysis?
JUANITA HENSLEY said that she did not know, but the division does
support the projections that were presented by Mr. Williams.
TOM WILLIAMS informed the committee that the projections utilized
the actual vehicle registration from 1995 with a three percent
increase projected. Nothing that Chairman Rieger suggested was
taken into account.
JAY DULANY, Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles, offered to
be available for questions.
SENATOR ADAMS moved that SB 226 be moved out of committee with
individual recommendations. Hearing no objections, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|