Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
05/02/2024 05:15 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB66 | |
SB223 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 66 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 223-ASSISTANT ADJUTANT GENERAL APPOINTMENT 6:09:16 PM CHAIR CLAMAN announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 223 "An Act relating to the appointment of an assistant adjutant general; and providing for an effective date." 6:09:49 PM ANGELA LAFLAMME, Legislative Liaison, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs (DMVA), Anchorage, Alaska, explained that SB 223 would expand the pool of potentially qualified candidates for the positions of assistant adjutant general (ATAG) by changing an existing requirement to a preference. She explained that ATAG serves as a state director while holding a military designation (ATAG is commander of both the Army and Air National Guard). She said that there are limited positions within the Air National Guard that meet the federal designation requirements to fill these positions, and finding candidates has been difficult. SB 223 would remove the language requiring five years of service in the Alaska National Guard at the time of appointment. This would become a preference. She pointed out that this change is consistent with existing statutory language related to the qualifications for the adjutant general, who appoints ATAG positions. These changes would expand the candidate pool to include anyone who meets the federal requirements for the position. This includes individuals leaving active-duty military service. She stated that DMVA would like to retain the preference, which reflects the department's intent to continue seeking individuals within the agency to fill these positions. 6:11:24 PM CHAIR CLAMAN commented on the difference between the requirements for the adjutant general position (which does not require service in the National Guard) and the ATAG positions, (which do require previous service in the National Guard). 6:11:40 PM MS. LAFLAMME confirmed that this interpretation is correct. 6:11:42 PM CHAIR CLAMAN invited Ms. LaFlamme to proceed with the sectional analysis. 6:11:47 PM MS. LAFLAMME paraphrased the following sectional analysis for SB 223: Sectional Analysis Senate Bill 223 Assistant Adjutant General Qualifications (33-GS2609\A) Section 1 amends AS 26.05.180(a) relating to headquarters staff of the Alaska National Guard regarding appointment and qualification of an assistant adjutant general by removing the requirement for at least five years of service in the Alaska Army National Guard or Alaska Air National Guard and replacing it with language providing the Adjutant General flexibility when appointing an assistant adjutant general to provide a preference to a candidate with at least five years of service. Section 2 establishes the effective date of this legislation. 6:12:33 PM SENATOR KIEHL asked what other requirements must be met for individuals to qualify for these positions. 6:12:48 PM MS. LAFLAMME replied that to be eligible for promotion to a federally recognized general general-grade officer (i.e. brigadier general or O-7), individuals must be a federally recognized officer at O-6 level, or a colonel. In addition, specific Federal trainings, certifications, and board approval are required. Individuals must be in good standing. The final determination for advancing from O-6 to O-7 is made by a congressional delegation and approved by Congress. She commented that there are many federal requirements. She stated that by the time individuals have reached O-6 level, they have much more than 5 years of military experience. SB 223 would expand the candidate pool beyond those who have completed 5 years of experience in the Alaska National Guard. 6:13:54 PM CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on SB 223; finding none, he closed public testimony. 6:14:13 PM CHAIR CLAMAN solicited the will of the committee. 6:14:14 PM SENATOR KIEHL moved to report SB 223, work order 33-GS2609\A, from committee with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal note(s). 6:14:36 PM CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and SB 223 was reported from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 66 Amendment Y.6.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Amendment Y.7.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Amendment Y.8.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
SB 223 version A.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
SB 223 Section Analysis version A 2.27.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
SB 223 Transmittal Letter 2.8.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
SB 223 Supporting Document - SSTA Hearing Follow Up 3.4.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
SB 223 Fiscal Note MVA-COM 1.24.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
HB 66 version N.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Letters of Support received as of 5.6.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Amend Letter- Disability Law Center 5.1.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Letters of Opposition received as of 5.6.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
HB 66 Summary of Changes Version Y to N.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |