Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
05/02/2024 05:15 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB66 | |
| SB223 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 66 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 223-ASSISTANT ADJUTANT GENERAL APPOINTMENT
6:09:16 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 223
"An Act relating to the appointment of an assistant adjutant
general; and providing for an effective date."
6:09:49 PM
ANGELA LAFLAMME, Legislative Liaison, Department of Military and
Veterans Affairs (DMVA), Anchorage, Alaska, explained that SB
223 would expand the pool of potentially qualified candidates
for the positions of assistant adjutant general (ATAG) by
changing an existing requirement to a preference. She explained
that ATAG serves as a state director while holding a military
designation (ATAG is commander of both the Army and Air National
Guard). She said that there are limited positions within the Air
National Guard that meet the federal designation requirements to
fill these positions, and finding candidates has been difficult.
SB 223 would remove the language requiring five years of service
in the Alaska National Guard at the time of appointment. This
would become a preference. She pointed out that this change is
consistent with existing statutory language related to the
qualifications for the adjutant general, who appoints ATAG
positions. These changes would expand the candidate pool to
include anyone who meets the federal requirements for the
position. This includes individuals leaving active-duty military
service. She stated that DMVA would like to retain the
preference, which reflects the department's intent to continue
seeking individuals within the agency to fill these positions.
6:11:24 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN commented on the difference between the
requirements for the adjutant general position (which does not
require service in the National Guard) and the ATAG positions,
(which do require previous service in the National Guard).
6:11:40 PM
MS. LAFLAMME confirmed that this interpretation is correct.
6:11:42 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN invited Ms. LaFlamme to proceed with the sectional
analysis.
6:11:47 PM
MS. LAFLAMME paraphrased the following sectional analysis for SB
223:
Sectional Analysis
Senate Bill 223
Assistant Adjutant General Qualifications
(33-GS2609\A)
Section 1 amends AS 26.05.180(a) relating to
headquarters staff of the Alaska National Guard
regarding appointment and qualification of an
assistant adjutant general by removing the requirement
for at least five years of service in the Alaska Army
National Guard or Alaska Air National Guard and
replacing it with language providing the Adjutant
General flexibility when appointing an assistant
adjutant general to provide a preference to a
candidate with at least five years of service.
Section 2 establishes the effective date of this
legislation.
6:12:33 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked what other requirements must be met for
individuals to qualify for these positions.
6:12:48 PM
MS. LAFLAMME replied that to be eligible for promotion to a
federally recognized general general-grade officer (i.e.
brigadier general or O-7), individuals must be a federally
recognized officer at O-6 level, or a colonel. In addition,
specific Federal trainings, certifications, and board approval
are required. Individuals must be in good standing. The final
determination for advancing from O-6 to O-7 is made by a
congressional delegation and approved by Congress. She commented
that there are many federal requirements. She stated that by the
time individuals have reached O-6 level, they have much more
than 5 years of military experience. SB 223 would expand the
candidate pool beyond those who have completed 5 years of
experience in the Alaska National Guard.
6:13:54 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on SB 223; finding none, he
closed public testimony.
6:14:13 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN solicited the will of the committee.
6:14:14 PM
SENATOR KIEHL moved to report SB 223, work order 33-GS2609\A,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached zero
fiscal note(s).
6:14:36 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and SB 223 was reported from the
Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 66 Amendment Y.6.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Amendment Y.7.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Amendment Y.8.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| SB 223 version A.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
| SB 223 Section Analysis version A 2.27.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
| SB 223 Transmittal Letter 2.8.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
| SB 223 Supporting Document - SSTA Hearing Follow Up 3.4.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
| SB 223 Fiscal Note MVA-COM 1.24.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
SB 223 |
| HB 66 version N.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Letters of Support received as of 5.6.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Amend Letter- Disability Law Center 5.1.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Letters of Opposition received as of 5.6.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Summary of Changes Version Y to N.pdf |
SJUD 5/2/2024 5:15:00 PM |
HB 66 |