Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/23/1998 01:50 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 221
"An Act relating to negatively amortizing loans
originated under a program approved or sponsored by
the state or federal government."
JERRY BURNETT, STAFF, SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS, commented
that many of Alaska's seniors are faced with the prospect
of reduced income and the inability to keep their homes.
One option for seniors is a "reverse annuity mortgage", a
mortgage wherein the financial institution provides a
stream of payments to the borrower in return for an equity
position in the borrower's home. The senior would be able
to stay in the home while receiving the financial benefits
of home ownership.
Mr. Burnett continued, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac developed
the "Homekeeper" loan program. The national program would
allow seniors to extract equity without a payment plan or
to purchase a home without high payments. The program has
several options, one of which is an equity share agreement
that would allow for a higher income allowance for the
senior. The option cannot be utilized in Alaska because of
a prohibition in current law. SB 21 would change State
law, AS 45.45.010(f), to enable certain shared equity loans
that are sponsored by the State of Alaska or the federal
government.
Mr. Burnett concluded that passage of SB 221 would benefit
many Alaskan seniors by allowing them an additional tool to
help retain their homes.
Representative J. Davies asked the difference between a
loan and a shared equity.
AMBER HUTCHENS, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), PRESIDENT,
ALASKA MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION, ANCHORAGE, stated that
the reversed mortgage programs normally go by the appraised
value of the property, and do not consider equity in the
future. The Homekeepers Program will allow the seniors to
extract more in estimating that the property will grow in
value. Other programs do not take into consideration the
growth of the property.
Representative J. Davies asked if there were any reversed
mortgage plans in the State of Alaska that were not offered
through the nationally chartered organizations such as
Fannie Mae. Ms. Hutchens replied that there are none
offered by Alaskan lenders at this time.
Representative J. Davies pointed out that the Homekeeper
loan program contained protections so that there would be
no eviction or forced sale prior to when the senior moves.
It also contains provisions that there be no cost to the
heirs in excess of the equity in the home. He asked if
those protections should be written in statute.
Co-Chair Therriault asked how the State would rate the
program. Mr. Burnett understood that Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation (AHFC) could approve such a program.
Representative J. Davies pointed out that the section of
statute being amended simply refers to bank, credit union,
savings and loan institution, pension fund, insurance and
mortgage companies and changing what they could do. He
assumed that any bank could propose a reverse mortgage.
Ms. Hutchens commented that section of the bill was well
written, pointing out that the program would be approved or
sponsored by the State. Normally, a bank does not go
through the State to get their program approved unless it
is a federally approved program.
Representative J. Davies recommended removing language on
Page 1, Line 11, "by the state". Representative Kelly
voiced concern with the proposed program in that it removes
money from the senior population and places it back in the
government. Ms. Hutchens advised that there are few
seniors who would need this option. Mr. Burnett commented
that currently, there are no State sponsored programs and
that the federal and national sponsored programs are
sufficient. He advised that removal of the language would
require a title change.
Co-Chair Therriault recommended so as to avoid a title
change, the Committee should specify items which any
prospective State program should insure.
CS SB 221 (FIN) was HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|