Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
02/23/2024 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB220 | |
| SB194 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 220 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 194 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 220-RCA REGULATE NATURAL GAS STORAGE FACILITY
3:33:22 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO.
220 "An Act relating to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and
regulation of the service of natural gas storage."
3:33:50 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP announced invited testimony.
3:34:10 PM
TONY IZZO, CEO, Matanuska Electric Association (MEA), Anchorage,
Alaska, invited testimony for SB 220, said MEA is Alaska's
oldest electric cooperative and serves the fastest growing and
second largest population center in the state. He emphasized
that the state is at a critical time with regard to energy. The
Southcentral region recently experienced declining gas reserves
coupled with colder than normal temperatures and record demand
for heat and power, almost resulting in rolling blackouts. Cook
Inlet has reached a point where there's no ability to secure
firm gas contracts beyond the expiration of existing contracts.
However, utilities require firm gas that can be delivered for
home heating and power production. Natural gas storage is a
proven method by which gas volumes available during off-peak
periods like the summer months can be saved, set aside, and
stored for periods of higher demand. Gas storage needs will
continue to increase as gas volumes decline while the future of
reliable power in the Southcentral area depends upon having more
storage. MEA aims to diversify its energy sources and is
reviewing various options including wind, solar, nuclear, and
carbon sequestration. It hopes to reach its goal of 50 percent
clean energy by 2050.
3:36:25 PM
MR. IZZO said pending legislation would require high percentages
of non-firm power like wind and solar. Even with aggressive
legislative targets, MEA's annual gas demand would drop from 5.6
billion cubic feet per year to almost three billion cubic feet
in 2040, which is approximately a 50 percent reduction. However,
a substantial three billion cubic feet would still be required
in a scenario that achieved 80 percent renewable power. Gas
storage would allow MEA to manage a diversified mix of energy
including non-firm renewables like wind and solar.
3:37:20 PM
MR. IZZO stated that as the CEO for a regulated utility, he
fully supports the regulation of third-party storage. While
significant gas storage exists in Cook Inlet, the majority is
non-regulated. It is essentially used to meet contractual
obligations by producers. He supports legislation that clarifies
that any provision of third-party storage must be subject to
economic regulation by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska
(RCA). Having gas storage regulated by the RCA provides the
necessary transparency and will ensure that rates for storage
are reasonable. SB 220 is an important step to offset declining
energy security.
3:38:20 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked for confirmation of his understanding that
the goal of a 2 bcf reduction is targeted for 2030.
3:38:32 PM
MR. IZZO replied that the goal was established last year and is
subject to change, but the objective is to reach 50 percent
clean, diversified, and carbon-free energy through any means by
2050.
3:39:07 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked if despite MEA's goals, must MEA maintain
spinning reserves with base load power or hard assets that do
not rely on renewable energy sources.
3:39:29 PM
MR. IZZO replied that is correct.
3:39:44 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP concluded invited testimony on SB 220.
3:39:50 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP opened public testimony; finding none, he closed
public testimony.
3:40:20 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL stated she was asked whether the Marathon
facility and its energy storage tanks on the Kenai Peninsula
would be subject to RCA regulations under SB 220. According to
the Department of Law's (DOL) interpretation, Section 3 of SB
220 would give RCA jurisdiction over gas storage service in a
situation where a small producer like Furie stores gas with
Hilcorp. She conveyed that Mr. Izzo mentioned there is a huge
amount of additional storage besides CINGSA in Cook Inlet which
is held by Hilcorp. Under the first scenario, if Furie stores
gas with Hilcorp, RCA's jurisdiction would extend over Hilcorp's
facilities for gas storage because two different entities store
gas for commercial purposes. Under the second scenario, if
Marathon imported LNG and stored it in its own storage tanks and
it took that gas and sold it to ENSTAR, they would not be
regulated. Under the third scenario, if ENSTAR imported LNG,
stored it at Marathon, and used its own gas, it would be covered
under SB 220. One entity would own the gas while the other one
would store it, so that would fall under this regulation.
3:43:21 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP held SB 220 in committee and turned the gavel
over to Co-Chair Giessel.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 194 Sponsor Statement 2.23.24.pdf |
SRES 2/23/2024 3:30:00 PM SRES 5/6/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194, version A.pdf |
SRES 2/23/2024 3:30:00 PM SRES 5/6/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 Sectional Analysis, version A 2.23.24.pdf |
SRES 2/23/2024 3:30:00 PM SRES 5/6/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 DNR Fiscal Note 1.16.24.pdf |
SRES 2/23/2024 3:30:00 PM SRES 5/6/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 Reduce Royalty on Cook Inlet Oil & Gas SRES Presentation 2.23.24.pdf |
SRES 2/23/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |