Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/31/1998 09:10 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 218(JUD)
"An Act relating to the crimes of murder, manslaughter,
and criminally negligent homicide and to homicides of
children."
BRETT HUBER, staff to the bill's sponsor, Senator Rick
Halford was invited to speak to this legislation. His
testimony was as follows.
"Death of a child is always amongst the greatest of
situations. When a child's death results from the
commission of a crime, or the failure to provide decent
care, the consequences should be certain and the punishment
should be severe."
"Senator Halford introduced this legislation to give law
enforcement, prosecutors and the court additional tools to
address crime involving the murder of children."
"CS for SB 218 Judiciary makes the following changes to our
criminal statutes. It amends the current law by adding a
new form of first-degree murder when the death of a child
results from the commission or attempted commission of
kidnapping or sexual abuse. It also expands the list of
offenses constituting felony murder to include sexual abuse
of a minor in the first and second degrees. It elevates
criminally negligent homicide from a Class C to a Class B
felony; establishes a 20 year mandatory minimum sentence for
a person convicted of a murder of a child under the age of
16; it increases the mandatory minimum sentence from five to
seven years for manslaughter when the victim is a child
under the age of 16; and it establishes a new sentencing
provision, which allows for a term of unsuspended
imprisonment that exceeds the presumptive term for certain
felony offenses if the victim is a child under the age of
16."
"Our children, societies most vulnerable members, deserve a
responsible level of care when entrusted to an adult. This
legislation is intended to establish a level of punishment
more commensurate with the crime and send a clear message of
deterrence: If you kill a child, you're going to jail for a
long time."
"You'll note in your packet endorsement of this bill by the
Alaska Peace Officers Association, The Victims for Justice,
and AWAKE."
"Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to testify, I
believe you have an amendment for the committee's
consideration. I could speak to it if you'd like or I'd be
happy to answer questions."
Senator Torgerson moved for adoption of the amendment -
Amendment #1, to allow the sponsor's representative to speak
to it while he was at the table. Senator Adams objected for
the same purpose.
Mr. Huber's comments on the amendment were as follows.
"The amendment was brought to us - a problem that the
Department of Law pointed out with our statutes governing
Custodial Interference in the First Degree. Currently the
custodial interference statutes reads, if you are sending a
child away to the other parent on a visitation basis, during
that visitation period if the other parent takes the child
and removes him from the state and keeps the child past
visitation, that's Custodial Interference in the First
Degree, which is a felony, which gives the opportunity for
our law enforcement agencies to work with other law
enforcement agencies in other states and the federal
government to find and bring back the child and the parent
that took the child."
However, currently if you're sending that child outside for
visitation, then if past the visitation time that other
parent keeps the child, you're in the same situation. But
because of the way the statutes are drafted, that doesn't
constitute felony first degree. It is a second degree and a
misdemeanor. The Department of Law brought this forward."
"There is an actual case sited that judge's ruling speaks to
the amendment. It says, 'The state argues that the phrase
includes any keeper of the child in any other state as the
extent of the statute was to enlist the power of federal
authorities and to have the power of extradition. The court
fully appreciates the need to charge a felony as other
states and the federal government will not assist in the
return of misdemeanant offendants. However the clear
language of AS 11.41.320 and its commentary require the
allegation that the defendant caused the victim to be
removed from the state. The state's request for a felony
warrant is thus denied.'"
"This amendment would take care of that situation."
Senator Pearce had no problem with the amendment. She
expressed surprise that the bill drafter, Jerry Luckhaupt
felt that the addition of this amendment would not require a
change of title for the bill. Mr. Huber responded that
there was a greater degree of latitude of what fit in the
title under single subject when dealing with criminal code
than other areas of the law. The drafter is comfortable
with the amendment, Mr. Huber attested.
Senator Adams removed his objection to the adoption of the
amendment. Without further objection, Amendment #1 was
adopted.
The committee began hearing public testimony on the bill.
Co-Chair Sharp noted several people in the audience who
signed up to answer questions if needed. LAUREE HUGONIN,
Director of the Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and
Sexual Assault wished to testify and was invited to the
table to do so. After introducing herself she spoke to the
legislation as follows.
"Just a couple of brief comments. The Network is in favor
and supports SB 218. We think it is important that people
understand that if they are going to chose to commit this
heinous act, then they're going to have a penalty to pay
that hopefully would give them pause to think."
"I don't know about the amendment you just passed. We have
not had an opportunity to review that before. I think we
would be generally supportive of it, my concern would be if
a battered woman needed to flee the state with her child to
protect her child, that would be keeping her child outside
the state. I haven't had a chance to look at what AS
11.41.330 says so I can't comment on that but we're
supportive of SB 218."
There were no questions of the testifier and no further
discussion by committee members.
Senator Phillips moved CS SB 218 (FIN) from committee with
the three accompanying zero fiscal notes. There was no
objection and Co-Chair Sharp so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|