Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/01/2024 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB173 | |
SB211 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 173 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 211 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 211-AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS/LOANS/SALES 3:02:24 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN reconvened the meeting and announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 211 "An Act relating to the powers of the board of agriculture and conservation; relating to loans and limitations under the Alaska Agricultural Loan Act; relating to federal crop insurance contributions; relating to municipal and state procurement preferences for agricultural products harvested in the state and fisheries products harvested or processed in the state; and providing for an effective date." 3:02:46 PM BRENT GOODRUM, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Anchorage, Alaska, presented SB 211 on behalf of the administration. He stated that SB 211 is intended to incentivize food production in Alaska. SB 211 was introduced by Governor Dunleavy and boosts state policies already in statute. This will have an immediate impact and will work in tandem with other short, medium, and long-term recommendations and actions. With SB 211, Governor Dunleavy hopes to increase food security and food independence for Alaskans and to expand Alaska's agriculture economic sector. 3:03:40 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 2: [Original punctuation provided.] Agriculture in Alaska: Status Report • Robust Alaska agriculture is a long-held vision • Hardy Alaskans are farming o 2017 national census: Nearly 1,000 Alaska farms and ranches produced about $29.6 M in crop value and $40.8 M in animal production • So much more potential o with the right support • Why grow agriculture? o Greater food security and independence for Alaskans o Develop an economic sector (jobs, value chain benefits) MR. GOODRUM noted that, since creating this slide, more recent national census data has been made available. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2022 National Agricultural Statistic Service Census of Agriculture, there are nearly 1,200 Alaska farms and ranches that have produced around $39.7 million in crop value and $51.2 million in animal production. He suggested that "a state as large and diverse as Alaska" has an even greater potential for growth in this sector, given adequate support. He stated that "greater food security and independence for Alaskans" requires economic diversification. 3:04:34 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 3: [Original punctuation provided.] Agriculture in Alaska: Key Challenges • High cost, high risk business • Often starting from scratch • Market access, supply/demand • Lack of infrastructure • Human challenges: more farmers, laborers • Chicken and egg dynamic: Where can State be a catalyst? MR. GOODRUM discussed the many challenges to agriculture in Alaska. For farmers, starting from scratch often means clearing "raw" land. It can be difficult for new farmers to access markets and to meet consumer demand - and the uncertainty of markets often precludes farmers from scaling up. The lack of infrastructure includes the following: transportation to markets; access to state lands suitable for agriculture; access to cheap power; and processing, manufacturing, and production facilities. He added that there is a demand for a skilled workforce, as many farmers are aging out of the profession. He questioned where the next generation of agricultural laborers will come from. 3:06:16 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 4: [Original punctuation provided.] CROP Act • SB 211: Capital access, Revenue protection and Open Procurement (CROP) Act • Based on recommendations by task forces, division experts, stakeholders' policy priorities • Selected for ability to get direct support to the industry, quickly (minimal new staff, programs to develop) MR. GOODRUM reiterated that SB 211 draws from existing statute. The three main components of the bill - capital access, revenue protection, and open procurement (CROP) - are based on recommendations of [those in the industry]. He clarified that there will be no additional programs to develop. 3:07:06 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 5: [Original punctuation provided.] Capital Access: The 'C' in CROP Act • Board of Agriculture and Conservation responsible for Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund o Key source of capital for farmers/producers • SB 211 responsive to evolving industry needs o More efficient Board of Agriculture process o Expand eligible activities, allow refinancing o $2 Million capital infusion into loan fund o Revising loan caps cumulatively and for specific activities (last updated in 1980s) MR. GOODRUM said the Board of Agriculture is currently comprised of working citizens. While all seven seats are full, it can be difficult to meet quorum requirements; this, in turn, can delay the loan application and approval process. He suggested that statutorily reducing the quorum requirement from five to four would increase the efficiency of the board. He explained that SB 211 would also expand the list of activities eligible for Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund (ARLF) funding to include shipping and transportation. This change was recommended by recent task forces and will potentially pave the way for agriculture-focused transportation cooperatives. This would help to reduce shipping costs into and throughout the state. SB 211 would also allow for refinancing of ARLF loans, provided that both the applicant and activities are eligible according to ARLF requirements. With respect to the proposed $2 million capital infusion into ARLF, he stated that this is the first injection into the fund since 1986 and would increase lending capital by nearly 20 percent. This increase would enable ARLF to meet any additional requests for funding that result from changes made by SB 211. He explained that SB 211 also directs the Board of Agriculture and Conservation (BAC) to increase loan caps that are difficult to update over time to keep up with inflation. He noted that, due to inflation, one hundred dollars over four decades ago is roughly equivalent to three hundred dollars in today's economy. He added that the current loan cap is one million dollars to any one borrower. Provisions in Section 3 would direct the Board of Agriculture and Conservation to set new loan limits and ceilings. He said a thorough, public process would be required. 3:09:29 PM MR. GOODRUM advanced to slide 6 displaying a bar chart depicting Capital Access - Fund Data Points. He explained that there are currently 52 active ARLF loans. The varied loan types reflect the diversity of agriculture in Alaska. He noted that the total principal balance of ARLF loans ($21.4 million) is equal to the sum of the balance ($9.3 million) plus authorized ($12.1 million). 3:10:09 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 7: [Original punctuation provided.] Revenue Protection: The 'R' • Concept in statute (AS 03.13), never funded; bill revises support formula • Fiscal note includes capital to pay for State support • Incentivizes production to boost feed supply, support larger herds • Helps offset risk and enables farmer to invest in farm infrastructure, expansions MR. GOODRUM elaborated on the above, noting that the fiscal note includes $2 million that will support crop insurance for current acres under production and allow for additional acres. He stated that, at current production and 2022 premium levels, the estimated 5-year cost of the program is approximately $900 thousand. He suggested that, should the program increase in size, additional funding would be available for premium support. Alaska Farm Bureau and task force reports have indicated that state support for insurance would incentivize increased production. Access to revenue protection policies will likewise increase access to capital, thereby lowering farmers' risk while improving equipment - such as irrigation systems - which, in turn, boost production. He explained that SB 211 focuses on three main crops: barley, wheat, and oats - foundational crops that provide food for livestock. He said that securing access to livestock feed is likely to enable larger herd sizes, which would then improve throughput - and therefore the economic status - of slaughterhouse operations. He explained that, in the future, USDA Revenue Protection crop insurance may be required for feed grain farmers to qualify for ARLF loans. 3:12:23 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 8: [Original punctuation provided.] Revenue Protection: How it Works • Eligible crops are those with revenue protection policies available: currently barley, wheat, oats • State covers: o 100 percent of premium in years 1-2 sufficient to obtain 85 percent revenue protection o 100 percent of premium in year 3 sufficient to obtain 80 percent revenue protection o 100 percent of premium in year 4 sufficient to obtain 75 percent revenue protection o In year 5 and on the farmer needs to pay the premium to obtain 55 percent revenue protection, state covers additional premium to reach 70 percent revenue protection MR. GOODRUM said that more details would be fleshed out in regulations, adding that there would likely be no minimum acreage requirement for coverage - [providing that farmers meet the USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) requirements]. He explained that in years 3-5, the state's coverage obligations are stepped down - and farmers would be able to purchase additional coverage to reach 85 percent revenue protection. He clarified that the USDA risk management agency subsidizes approximately 62 percent of the revenue protection - the state of Alaska would cover the remainder. 3:14:32 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 9: [Original punctuation provided.] Revenue Protection: How it Works • State role: accept applications, verify eligible producers, submit verification to RMA, send funds to RMA • Producer role: selects coverage at desired level from an approved provider, reports acreage, pays any premium not covered by state • State does not adjudicate loss claims or cover losses through federal Risk Management Agency (RMA) MR. GOODRUM explained that RMA has a list of "approved insurance providers" (AIP). There are around 14 AIPs nationwide. RMA sets the terms for AIP policies. He clarified that the state will not be issuing insurance policies but will be acting in an enrollment capacity and noted that the State is not getting into the insurance business. 3:15:21 PM MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 10: [Original punctuation provided.] Open Procurement: The 'O' and 'P' • Procurement preferences already in statute o State agencies, school districts and municipalities that receive state funds • Alaska-grown agricultural and Alaska fisheries products • Includes responsible protections • Incentivizes more production by providing access to institutional markets 3:17:06 PM MR. GOODRUM elaborated on the above, pointing out that Alaska Grown and Alaska fisheries products will be given preference. Protections will include providing a full sales and pricing list when responding to solicitation; there will be penalties for submitting inaccurate information. Additionally, an annual report to the legislature will be required. He stated that, excluding Alaska fisheries products, few producers are currently able to provide the quantities that large, institutional buyers require. Thus, a significant increase in spending is not expected. He said that the DOA will continue to work on more effective ways to connect growers and buyers, adding that SB 211 offers an immediate step in that direction. There is support for encouraging retailers to sell more Alaska grown products. He pointed out that greater access to local markets offers producers the opportunity to scale up and increases food security and independence in Alaska. 3:17:42 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN opened public testimony on SB 211; finding none he closed public testimony. 3:18:12 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN held SB 211 in committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 211 Transmittal Letter 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 4/12/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB 211 Fiscal Note-DCCED-ASMI 01.12.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB 211 Fiscal Note-DCCED-DCRA 01.12.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB 211 Fiscal Note-DNR-AGR 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB211 ver A.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 4/12/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB 211 Fiscal Note-DNR-ARLF 02.08.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB 211 Sectional Analysis 02.01.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB173 Public Testimony Received as of 02.29.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Draft Proposed Amendment ver H.1.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB211 Presentation by DNR to SLAC 03.01.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
SB173 Letter of Support-Email-Shannon Methe-01.13.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Letter of Support-Email-Andrew Ault-01.21.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Public Testimony-Email-Therese Lewandowski-01.21.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Public Testimony-Received as of 1pm 01.23.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Sectional Analysis ver H.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Sponsor Statement ver H.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 ver H.PDF |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Fiscal Note-LAW-CJL-01.19.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Fiscal Note-EED-SSA-01.19.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Sponsor Presentation to SLAC 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
SB173 Public Testimony(2)-Received as of noon 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |