Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/01/2024 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB173 | |
| SB211 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 173 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 211 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 211-AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS/LOANS/SALES
3:02:24 PM
CHAIR BJORKMAN reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 211 "An Act relating to the
powers of the board of agriculture and conservation; relating to
loans and limitations under the Alaska Agricultural Loan Act;
relating to federal crop insurance contributions; relating to
municipal and state procurement preferences for agricultural
products harvested in the state and fisheries products harvested
or processed in the state; and providing for an effective date."
3:02:46 PM
BRENT GOODRUM, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), Anchorage, Alaska, presented SB 211 on behalf
of the administration. He stated that SB 211 is intended to
incentivize food production in Alaska. SB 211 was introduced by
Governor Dunleavy and boosts state policies already in statute.
This will have an immediate impact and will work in tandem with
other short, medium, and long-term recommendations and actions.
With SB 211, Governor Dunleavy hopes to increase food security
and food independence for Alaskans and to expand Alaska's
agriculture economic sector.
3:03:40 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 2:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Agriculture in Alaska: Status Report
• Robust Alaska agriculture is a long-held vision
• Hardy Alaskans are farming
o 2017 national census: Nearly 1,000 Alaska farms
and ranches produced about $29.6 M in crop value
and $40.8 M in animal production
• So much more potential
o with the right support
• Why grow agriculture?
o Greater food security and independence for
Alaskans
o Develop an economic sector (jobs, value chain
benefits)
MR. GOODRUM noted that, since creating this slide, more recent
national census data has been made available. According to the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2022 National
Agricultural Statistic Service Census of Agriculture, there are
nearly 1,200 Alaska farms and ranches that have produced around
$39.7 million in crop value and $51.2 million in animal
production. He suggested that "a state as large and diverse as
Alaska" has an even greater potential for growth in this sector,
given adequate support. He stated that "greater food security
and independence for Alaskans" requires economic
diversification.
3:04:34 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 3:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Agriculture in Alaska: Key Challenges
• High cost, high risk business
• Often starting from scratch
• Market access, supply/demand
• Lack of infrastructure
• Human challenges: more farmers, laborers
• Chicken and egg dynamic: Where can State be a
catalyst?
MR. GOODRUM discussed the many challenges to agriculture in
Alaska. For farmers, starting from scratch often means clearing
"raw" land. It can be difficult for new farmers to access
markets and to meet consumer demand - and the uncertainty of
markets often precludes farmers from scaling up. The lack of
infrastructure includes the following: transportation to
markets; access to state lands suitable for agriculture; access
to cheap power; and processing, manufacturing, and production
facilities. He added that there is a demand for a skilled
workforce, as many farmers are aging out of the profession. He
questioned where the next generation of agricultural laborers
will come from.
3:06:16 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 4:
[Original punctuation provided.]
CROP Act
• SB 211: Capital access, Revenue protection and Open
Procurement (CROP) Act
• Based on recommendations by task forces, division
experts, stakeholders' policy priorities
• Selected for ability to get direct support to the
industry, quickly (minimal new staff, programs to
develop)
MR. GOODRUM reiterated that SB 211 draws from existing statute.
The three main components of the bill - capital access, revenue
protection, and open procurement (CROP) - are based on
recommendations of [those in the industry]. He clarified that
there will be no additional programs to develop.
3:07:06 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 5:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Capital Access: The 'C' in CROP Act
• Board of Agriculture and Conservation responsible for
Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund
o Key source of capital for farmers/producers
• SB 211 responsive to evolving industry needs
o More efficient Board of Agriculture process
o Expand eligible activities, allow refinancing
o $2 Million capital infusion into loan fund
o Revising loan caps cumulatively and for specific
activities (last updated in 1980s)
MR. GOODRUM said the Board of Agriculture is currently comprised
of working citizens. While all seven seats are full, it can be
difficult to meet quorum requirements; this, in turn, can delay
the loan application and approval process. He suggested that
statutorily reducing the quorum requirement from five to four
would increase the efficiency of the board. He explained that SB
211 would also expand the list of activities eligible for
Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund (ARLF) funding to include
shipping and transportation. This change was recommended by
recent task forces and will potentially pave the way for
agriculture-focused transportation cooperatives. This would help
to reduce shipping costs into and throughout the state. SB 211
would also allow for refinancing of ARLF loans, provided that
both the applicant and activities are eligible according to ARLF
requirements. With respect to the proposed $2 million capital
infusion into ARLF, he stated that this is the first injection
into the fund since 1986 and would increase lending capital by
nearly 20 percent. This increase would enable ARLF to meet any
additional requests for funding that result from changes made by
SB 211. He explained that SB 211 also directs the Board of
Agriculture and Conservation (BAC) to increase loan caps that
are difficult to update over time to keep up with inflation. He
noted that, due to inflation, one hundred dollars over four
decades ago is roughly equivalent to three hundred dollars in
today's economy. He added that the current loan cap is one
million dollars to any one borrower. Provisions in Section 3
would direct the Board of Agriculture and Conservation to set
new loan limits and ceilings. He said a thorough, public process
would be required.
3:09:29 PM
MR. GOODRUM advanced to slide 6 displaying a bar chart depicting
Capital Access - Fund Data Points. He explained that there are
currently 52 active ARLF loans. The varied loan types reflect
the diversity of agriculture in Alaska. He noted that the total
principal balance of ARLF loans ($21.4 million) is equal to the
sum of the balance ($9.3 million) plus authorized ($12.1
million).
3:10:09 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 7:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Revenue Protection: The 'R'
• Concept in statute (AS 03.13), never funded; bill
revises support formula
• Fiscal note includes capital to pay for State support
• Incentivizes production to boost feed supply, support
larger herds
• Helps offset risk and enables farmer to invest in farm
infrastructure, expansions
MR. GOODRUM elaborated on the above, noting that the fiscal note
includes $2 million that will support crop insurance for current
acres under production and allow for additional acres. He stated
that, at current production and 2022 premium levels, the
estimated 5-year cost of the program is approximately $900
thousand. He suggested that, should the program increase in
size, additional funding would be available for premium support.
Alaska Farm Bureau and task force reports have indicated that
state support for insurance would incentivize increased
production. Access to revenue protection policies will likewise
increase access to capital, thereby lowering farmers' risk while
improving equipment - such as irrigation systems - which, in
turn, boost production. He explained that SB 211 focuses on
three main crops: barley, wheat, and oats - foundational crops
that provide food for livestock. He said that securing access to
livestock feed is likely to enable larger herd sizes, which
would then improve throughput - and therefore the economic
status - of slaughterhouse operations. He explained that, in the
future, USDA Revenue Protection crop insurance may be required
for feed grain farmers to qualify for ARLF loans.
3:12:23 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 8:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Revenue Protection: How it Works
• Eligible crops are those with revenue protection
policies available: currently barley, wheat, oats
• State covers:
o 100 percent of premium in years 1-2 sufficient to
obtain 85 percent revenue protection
o 100 percent of premium in year 3 sufficient to
obtain 80 percent revenue protection
o 100 percent of premium in year 4 sufficient to
obtain 75 percent revenue protection
o In year 5 and on the farmer needs to pay the
premium to obtain 55 percent revenue protection,
state covers additional premium to reach 70
percent revenue protection
MR. GOODRUM said that more details would be fleshed out in
regulations, adding that there would likely be no minimum
acreage requirement for coverage - [providing that farmers meet
the USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) requirements]. He
explained that in years 3-5, the state's coverage obligations
are stepped down - and farmers would be able to purchase
additional coverage to reach 85 percent revenue protection. He
clarified that the USDA risk management agency subsidizes
approximately 62 percent of the revenue protection - the state
of Alaska would cover the remainder.
3:14:32 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 9:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Revenue Protection: How it Works
• State role: accept applications, verify eligible
producers, submit verification to RMA, send funds to
RMA
• Producer role: selects coverage at desired level from
an approved provider, reports acreage, pays any
premium not covered by state
• State does not adjudicate loss claims or cover losses
through federal Risk Management Agency (RMA)
MR. GOODRUM explained that RMA has a list of "approved insurance
providers" (AIP). There are around 14 AIPs nationwide. RMA sets
the terms for AIP policies. He clarified that the state will not
be issuing insurance policies but will be acting in an
enrollment capacity and noted that the State is not getting into
the insurance business.
3:15:21 PM
MR. GOODRUM spoke to points on slide 10:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Open Procurement: The 'O' and 'P'
• Procurement preferences already in statute
o State agencies, school districts and
municipalities that receive state funds
• Alaska-grown agricultural and Alaska fisheries
products
• Includes responsible protections
• Incentivizes more production by providing access to
institutional markets
3:17:06 PM
MR. GOODRUM elaborated on the above, pointing out that Alaska
Grown and Alaska fisheries products will be given preference.
Protections will include providing a full sales and pricing list
when responding to solicitation; there will be penalties for
submitting inaccurate information. Additionally, an annual
report to the legislature will be required. He stated that,
excluding Alaska fisheries products, few producers are currently
able to provide the quantities that large, institutional buyers
require. Thus, a significant increase in spending is not
expected. He said that the DOA will continue to work on more
effective ways to connect growers and buyers, adding that SB 211
offers an immediate step in that direction. There is support for
encouraging retailers to sell more Alaska grown products. He
pointed out that greater access to local markets offers
producers the opportunity to scale up and increases food
security and independence in Alaska.
3:17:42 PM
CHAIR BJORKMAN opened public testimony on SB 211; finding none
he closed public testimony.
3:18:12 PM
CHAIR BJORKMAN held SB 211 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 211 Transmittal Letter 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 4/12/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB 211 Fiscal Note-DCCED-ASMI 01.12.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB 211 Fiscal Note-DCCED-DCRA 01.12.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB 211 Fiscal Note-DNR-AGR 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB211 ver A.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 4/12/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB 211 Fiscal Note-DNR-ARLF 02.08.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB 211 Sectional Analysis 02.01.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB173 Public Testimony Received as of 02.29.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Draft Proposed Amendment ver H.1.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB211 Presentation by DNR to SLAC 03.01.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 211 |
| SB173 Letter of Support-Email-Shannon Methe-01.13.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Letter of Support-Email-Andrew Ault-01.21.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Public Testimony-Email-Therese Lewandowski-01.21.24.pdf |
SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Public Testimony-Received as of 1pm 01.23.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Sectional Analysis ver H.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Sponsor Statement ver H.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 ver H.PDF |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Fiscal Note-LAW-CJL-01.19.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Fiscal Note-EED-SSA-01.19.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Sponsor Presentation to SLAC 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |
| SB173 Public Testimony(2)-Received as of noon 01.24.24.pdf |
SL&C 1/24/2024 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 173 |