Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/12/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB307 | |
| SB210 | |
| SJR21 | |
| SB214 | |
| HB6 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 214 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 252 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SJR 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | HB 307 | ||
| = | SB 210 | ||
SB 210-MILITARY DEPLOYMENT AND CHILD CUSTODY
1:35:41 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 210 and asked for
a motion to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS).
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt work draft CS for SB 210,
labeled 26-LS1243\N, as the working document. There being no
objection, version N was before the committee.
1:36:21 PM
CHAIR FRENCH moved Amendment 1 and objected for discussion
purposes.
Amendment 1
26-LS1243\N.1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR FRENCH
TO: CSSB 210( ), Draft Version "N"
Page 2, line 25, following "section.":
Insert "In addition, there is a rebuttable presumption
that a deployed parent's visitation rights may not be
delegated to a family member who has a history of
perpetrating domestic violence against a spouse, a
child, or a domestic living partner, or to a family
member with an individual in the family member's
household who has a history of perpetrating domestic
violence against a spouse, a child, or a domestic
living partner."
Page 4, line 10, following "section.":
Insert "In addition, there is a rebuttable presumption
that a deployed parent's visitation rights may not be
delegated to a family member who has a history of
perpetrating domestic violence against a spouse, a
child, or a domestic living partner, or to a family
member with an individual in the family member's
household who has a history of perpetrating domestic
violence against a spouse, a child, or a domestic
living partner."
CHAIR FRENCH asked Ms. Mischel to tell the committee what the
amendment intends to do.
JEAN MISCHEL, Drafting Attorney, Legislative Legal Services,
Legislative Affairs Agency, explained that the amendment
clarifies that both subsection (g) on page 2 and subsection (g)
page 4 provide for consideration of the best interest of the
child. Both subsections cross reference AS 25.24.150(c) and AS
25.24.150(g) pertaining to violence in the home when there is a
custody dispute. AS 25.24.150(g) provides a rebuttable
presumption against awarding custody to a parent who has
perpetrated domestic violence. The amendment responds to the
concerns expressed by the Alaska Network on Domestic Violence
and Sexual Assault ("Network") and clarifies that the rebuttable
presumption also applies if there is a delegation under this
bill to a family member who has a history of domestic violence.
The amendment language mirrors AS 25.24.150(g) as it relates to
parents. It clarifies that the presumption against visitation
requested by a military parent for a family member if that
family member has a history of perpetuating domestic violence.
It is not a substantive, but it makes it abundantly clear, she
said.
1:39:53 PM
CHAIR FRENCH asked Mr. Tempel if he and the sponsor have
reviewed the language in Amendment 1.
JOSH TEMPEL, Staff to Senator Huggins, replied they did review
the language and have no objection.
CHAIR FRENCH removed his objection; finding no further
objection, he announced that Amendment 1 passes.
1:40:27 PM
CHAIR FRENCH moved Amendment 2 and objected for discussion
purposes.
Amendment 2
26-LS1243\N.2
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR FRENCH
TO: CSSB 210( ), Draft Version "N"
Page 4, line 4, following "court":
Insert "; if a valid court order issued under
AS 12.61.120 or AS 25.20.060 or an equivalent
provision in another jurisdiction is in effect that
requires that the address or contact information of
the parent who is not deployed be kept confidential,
the notification shall be made to the court only, and
a copy of the order shall be included in the
notification"
MS. MISCHEL explained that the amendment responds to a concern
expressed by the Network that immediate notification of the
address of the nondeployed parent might contradict another
protective order. The amendment cross references current law and
provides that the notification will be made to the court only
and will be kept confidential if a valid order is in effect.
CHAIR FRENCH asked Mr. Tempel if he and the sponsor have
reviewed the language.
MR. TEMPEL replied Senator Huggins supports the amendment.
CHAIR FRENCH removed his objection and announced that without
further objection Amendment 2 passes.
1:42:30 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report CS for SB 210, [26-LS1243\N
as amended], from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSSB 210(JUD)
moved from Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
At ease from 1:42 p.m. to 1:43 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 214 sponsor statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 214 |
| Nat Coalition Agains Dom Viol.PDF |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 214 |
| Humane Society.PDF |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 214 |
| HSUS Letter of Support - SB 214.pdf |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 214 |
| SB252 Letter.PDF |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 252 |
| SBS 252 Sectional Analysis.PDF |
SJUD 2/12/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 252 |