Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
03/29/2012 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB206 | |
| HB316 | |
| HB271 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 316 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 206-INTERSTATE MINING COMPACT & COMMISSION
9:01:53 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI announced that the first bill to come before
the committee would be SB 206, which would incorporate the
Interstate Mining Compact in state statute and authorize Alaska
to participate fully in the Interstate Mining Commission. This
commission is a multi-state organization that represents the
natural resource interests of its member states. It was created
in 1970 with the entry by four states. Since then, 19 additional
states have joined the compact, and five additional states have
become associate members. Alaska is presently an associate
member. This is the first hearing on the bill.
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, sponsor of SB 206, presented an overview
of the bill. She referred to a chart in members' packets,
Interstate Compacts and Commissions in Alaska Statute. She noted
that Alaska belongs to at least 23 interstate compacts and
commissions. She explained that the bill was an opportunity to
demonstrate leadership in resource development. Becoming a full
member of the Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC) would
give Alaska voting rights.
She pointed out that Alaska has a large deposit of rare earth
elements, which will become an issue on the national scene in
the near future. She noted the bill enjoys bi-partisan support.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI requested a sectional analysis.
SENATOR GIESSEL explained each section of the bill. She related
that lines 5-7 say that the Interstate Mining Compact contained
in this section is enacted into law. Article 1 finds the
importance of mining to the state and proposes to support
environmentally sound mining. Article 2 is the definition
section. Article 3 is state programs and it ensures that a
member state has adequate mining regulations. Article 4 is about
powers of the commission to study, make recommendations, and
gather and disseminate information on mining-relate issues.
Article 5 creates the commission. Article 6 allows the
commission to establish advisory, technical, and regional
committees. Article 7 details how the commission's finances are
to be handled. The fiscal note comes from this area. The budget
is apportioned to the state members and is based on the value of
mined products.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about the fiscal note.
SENATOR GIESSEL said that Mr. Fogels would speak to the fiscal
note.
She continued with Article 8, which describes that states must
enact the compact to participate and must repeal the act to
withdraw. Article 9 maintains that the compact does not limit,
repeal, or supersede any state laws. Article 10 provides that
all phrases, clauses, sentences, and provisions are severable.
She related that the bill concludes with a provision for an
alternate, requirements for bylaws and amendments, and an
immediate effective date.
9:10:57 AM
ED FOGELS, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources,
provided information related to SB 206. He pointed out that
mining activity has increased in the state. There are now seven
major operating mines in Alaska, which are strong economic
contributors. He opined that DNR is doing a good job of
permitting those mines. He spoke of the controversy and the
questioning of the permitting process. As part of a permitting
review, the state has been asked to look at how it collaborates
with the federal side of the permitting process, as well as
finding out how other states do their permitting. He said that
IMCC can help Alaska work with both of those issues.
He provided the history of the state's association with IMCC.
Alaska has been an associate member for six years. IMCC brings
together the environmental regulatory programs and the mining
programs from 24 states and is a very robust information
exchange. IMCC carries the full weight of 24 states when it goes
to Washington, D.C., to testify in Congress or to approach a
federal agency.
He gave an example of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and their pending decision to provide bonding for hard rock
mining. The issue relates to the Super Fund Law. Mining is the
first to be considered. There is a risk if EPA takes over the
responsibility for bonding for hard rock mining that it would
negatively impact the state's ability to regulate mining. He
stated that IMCC has done a great job of bringing mining states
together to meet with the EPA in an effort to work on a
solution. He said he was the governor's representative to the
IMCC.
9:15:22 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked what benefits Alaska would get from
full membership.
MR. FOGELS explained that after five or six years the state has
to make a decision whether to become a full member because it no
longer can be an associate member. He described the benefits of
full membership, such as being able to vote and sit on
committees. The more full members IMCC has, the more powerful
the voice in Washington, DC.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked how Alaska's membership contribution would
rate compared to other states. He understood that 50 percent of
membership dues is based on the value of the state's ores.
MR. FOGELS explained that the first half of membership dues is
pro-rated equally to all member states, and the second half is
pro-rated base on the state's mineral valuation. He suggested
asking Greg Conrad for more details.
9:18:00 AM
SENATOR PASKVAN noted a favorable letter from the Council of
Alaska Producers. He asked if industry contributes to the
membership fees, or if there is a policy against that.
MR. FOGELS reported that industry does not contribute to IMCC.
It is an organization of state governments that pay dues.
SENATOR KOOKESH said he was interested in more information about
the dues structure.
MR. FOGELS pointed out that IMCC dues would not continue to
increase; the state would pay more of the share as the mining
industry grows. The cap is structured on IMCC's annual budget.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if Nevada was a member.
MR. FOGELS said Nevada is not a member. He related that the IMCC
began with the coal states in the East Coast in the 60's and
70's. Now, Western states are associate members. Alaska is the
first to consider full memberships. He said there was growing
interest for IMCC in non-coal states.
9:22:22 AM
SENATOR GIESSEL clarified the states' membership status using a
chart.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there are any negatives to Alaska's
joining the IMCC.
MR. FOGELS didn't see any downsides except for the fiscal cost.
The IMCC does not bind states to anything, but is more of an
advisory commission.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked for examples of issues IMCC has dealt
with in the past that Alaska would have wanted to weigh in on.
MR. FOGELS brought up the EPA bonding issue and also issues
related to the merger of the Office of Surfaces Mining with the
Bureau of Land Management. The proposed merger was being
conducted without state input. He also listed federal hard rock
mining issues and key federal legislation, such as the Good
Samaritan legislation, which would allow non-profits to clean up
old mine sites.
9:25:25 AM
GREGORY CONRAD, Executive Director, Interstate Mining Compact
Commission (IMCC), provided information related to SB 206. He
explained that in today's regulatory climate in Washington, DC,
it is important for states to have a say. IMCC is an important
entity when dealing with federal requirements. He listed several
issues that IMCC has testified on, such as Good Samaritan
Protections, stream protection requirements for surface coal
mining operations, hard rock financial assurance requirements,
and the impacts on the federal budget on state grant programs.
He noted in IMCC's annual report, recommendations on many issues
which are developed by the states. Without the input of the
states, none of this would be possible. The ability to speak
with one voice on common concerns gives meaning to IMCC's
purpose.
He addressed a specific matter as to why Alaska should become a
full member of IMCC. He listed the advantages of membership: a
formal vote, committee memberships, and access to communications
and programs. He continued to say that Congress and federal
agencies will recognize Alaska's interest in issues as a member
of IMCC. He said participation opens avenues. He noted that IMCC
is focused solely on mining issues.
9:30:14 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about financial implications to Alaska
with the increase of mines in the state and how that might
affect IMCC dues.
MR. CONRAD explained that dues are based on the value of mineral
production based on figures provided by the U.S. Geological
Survey for non-coal, and by Energy Information Administration
figures for coal. The dues are proportioned over two years. The
dues cap is two times the equal share amount allocated among the
states. For 2014 and 2015 the maximum amount any one state would
pay would be $57,000. Currently, Alaska's dues would be about
$35,000 to $40,000. They could increase up to the cap as it is
reached. He noted that West Virginia's share was $72,000, but
the cap brought them down to $57,000. He concluded that Alaska
would not be one of the larger dues-paying states.
9:33:10 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked what IMCC's total budget was.
MR. CONRAD related that the information is found in IMCC's
annual report, which he offered to make available. He believed
that IMCC's projected expenses for FY 2014 and FY 2015 were
about $520,000.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI inquired how many staff IMCC employs.
MR. CONRAD said two.
9:33:51 AM
SENATOR PASKVAN asked why Nevada was not a member.
MR. CONRAD reported that Nevada has made a request to its
governor to join IMCC. IMCC is also working with Montana and
Arizona to join. In the past, during the first 20 years, IMCC
was not involved in hard rock issues. Currently, Western States
have expressed an interest in becoming members. IMCC's strategic
plan now includes Western States' issues.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if there have been policy issue reasons
for states' not joining.
MR. CONRAD related that the only concern has been related to
fiscal expense, but not to policy issues. Most states realize
that membership dues are reasonable.
9:37:45 AM
TIM MUSGROVE, representing himself, Soldotna, Alaska, testified
in support of SB 206. He urged the committee to continue
responsible development of mining-related natural resources by
joining IMCC as a full member.
9:38:43 AM
JIM DUFFIELD, Chairman, Alaska Miners' Association, testified in
support of SB 206. He said he has seen the benefits of IMCC in
other states. He encouraged full membership in IMCC.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if membership would bind the state or
have any negative ramifications.
9:40:09 AM
ASHELY BROWN, Assistant Attorney General, Oil, Gas & Mining
Section, Department of Law, answered questions related to SB
206. She replied that no new laws would have to be enacted. She
referred to Article 3 which she opined is sufficient to fulfill
the terms of the compact. Article 9 states that nothing in the
compact shall be construed to limit, repeal, or supersede any
laws of the state. She stated that the bill would not limit
sovereignty. There is an option for the state to withdraw from
the compact.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if IMCC was an advisory group that
addresses issues of importance to the mining industry.
MR. FOGELS clarified that it is an advisory body for the states,
not for the industry, as they deal with mining issues.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI closed public testimony. He set SB 206 aside.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 206 Full Text.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB206-DNR-MLW-03-23-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - What We Do.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 - Memo of Understanding.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Background.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Support Document-AMA Letter.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Member States.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Welcome.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| 1- HB0316 ver I- Bill.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 2- HB 316 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| QA on HB316 memo.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-Fiscal Note-DMVA-MVA-CO-02-13-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DOR-AHFC-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-28-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 7- HB 316- Rep Saddler Testimony.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB0316A.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| CSHB 271 (TRA).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271 Fiscal.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271(TRA) H. Floor amend 1.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB0271-1-2-022212-ADM-N.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB271 Support Renovators.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Ak Truck support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Fed Standard CMV.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 NFIB Support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Norcom Operations.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Norcom.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 St. John support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Vehicle classes.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HHB 271 Support enstar.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271 AGC Letter.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB0271A.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 SPONSOR.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271-DOA-DMV-2-17-12 (3).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |