Legislature(2021 - 2022)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/30/2022 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB190 | |
| SB193 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 204 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 193 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 30, 2022
9:03 a.m.
9:03:12 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Bishop called the Senate Finance Committee meeting
to order at 9:03 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Click Bishop, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Lyman Hoffman
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Bill Wielechowski
Senator David Wilson
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Natasha von Imhof
ALSO PRESENT
Erin Shine, Staff, Senator Click Bishop; Madison Govin,
Staff to Senator Micciche; Kris Curtis, Legislative
Auditor, Alaska Division of Legislative Audit; Senator
Peter Micciche, Sponsor; Sara Chambers, Director, Division
of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing,
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development;
Emma Torkelson, Staff to Senator Revak; Eddie Grasser,
Director, Division of Wildlife Conservation, Department of
Fish and Game.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Dr. Brian Larson, Chair, Alaska Board of Chiropractic
Examiners, Soldotna.
SUMMARY
SB 190 EXTEND REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA
CSSB 190(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with
three "do pass" recommendations, three "no
recommendation" recommendations and a new fiscal
impact note from the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development.
SB 193 EXTEND BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS
SB 193 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
SB 204 HUNTING PERMIT/TAG AUCTIONS/RAFFLES
SB 204 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
SENATE BILL NO. 190
"An Act extending the termination date of the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska; and providing for an
effective date."
9:03:52 AM
Co-Chair Bishop relayed that it was the third hearing for
SB 190. The committee had opened and closed public
testimony on March 21, 2022. It was the committee's
intention to consider a committee substitute (CS), review
the fiscal notes, and look to the will of the committee.
9:04:18 AM
AT EASE
9:04:40 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for SB 190, Work Draft 32-LS1525\W (Ambrose,
3/25/22).
Co-Chair Bishop OBJECTED for discussion.
ERIN SHINE, STAFF, SENATOR CLICK BISHOP, discussed the
changes reflected in the CS. She explained that the changes
between the previous CS the committee had adopted and
Version W before the committee was on page 1, lines 8
through 11. The change added intent language for the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) to adopt regulations
specific to refuse utilities, to provide for sufficient
public notice, and time for rate payers to meaningfully
comment on rate filings.
Senator Wielechowski commented that he was glad to see the
intent language included in the proposed CS. He discussed
legislative history and intent pertaining to RCA. He
relayed that that current regulations for electric
cooperatives would be different than the regulations that
would be needed for electric utilities, in large part
because the coops were owned by the rate payers whereas
refuse coops were for-profit organizations. He continued
that the intent was to ensure the public had sufficient
notice and an opportunity to meaningfully comment on rate
findings, in particular for the simplified rate filing
procedure.
Co-Chair Bishop WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered. The CS for SB 190 was
ADOPTED.
Senator Wielechowski discussed a new fiscal note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
with OMB Component 2417. The appropriation was for the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska. For the years FY 23
through FY 28, the appropriation was for $9,735,900 funded
by regulatory surcharge and considered to be Designated
General Funds (DGF).
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to report CSSB 190 (FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CSSB 190(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with three "do
pass" recommendations, three "no recommendation"
recommendations and a new fiscal impact note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
9:07:55 AM
AT EASE
9:08:54 AM
RECONVENED
SENATE BILL NO. 193
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners; and providing for an effective
date."
9:08:56 AM
Co-Chair Bishop relayed that it was the first hearing for
SB 193. The committees intention was to hear a bill
introduction, take invited and public testimony, and set
the bill aside.
9:09:24 AM
MADISON GOVIN, STAFF TO SENATOR MICCICHE, explained that
the CS for SB 193 would extend the termination date for the
Chiropractic Examiners Board for two more years, making the
new sunset date June 30, 2024. The CS also required that a
report from the legislative audit division be submitted to
the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee on the board's
compliance with the audit. She noted that the legislative
auditor was present to review the audit findings.
9:10:34 AM
KRIS CURTIS, LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, ALASKA DIVISION OF
LEGISLATIVE AUDIT, relayed that the Division of Legislative
Audit had conducted a sunset audit of the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners dated June of 2021 (copy on file).
Overall, the division had found that the board served the
public's interest by conducting meetings in accordance with
state law, by amending certain regulations to improve the
chiropractic profession, and effectively licensing and
regulating chiropractic physicians. Additionally, the audit
found that one board member did not comply with the
statutory requirements for appointments, and additional
resources were needed to conduct investigations in a timely
manner.
Ms. Curtis continued that the division recommended a five-
year extension, which was three years less than the eight-
year maximum allowed for in statute. The reduced extension
recommendation was the result of an issue identified during
the audit that may impact the board's ability to protect
the public. She noted that the details related to the issue
were not included in the report to preserve the
confidentiality of an ongoing investigation.
Ms. Curtis referenced page 5 of the audit, which showed
standard licensing information. As of January 2021, there
were 306 licensed chiropractors. She directed attention to
page 6 of the audit, which showed board revenues and
expenditures and indicated that the board alternated
between a deficit and surplus during the audit period. She
continued that according to the Division of Corporations,
Business and Professional Licensing (CBPL), the deficits
were within a reasonable range and no fee increases were
recommended. Board fees were shown on page 7.
Ms. Curtis listed two recommendations listed on page 9. The
division recommended that the governor make appointments in
accordance with statutory requirements. The division had
found that the board's public member was a licensed
Emergency Medical Technician, while statute prohibited a
public member from having a direct financial interest in
the healthcare industry. The second recommendation was on
page 10 and recommended that CPBL's director allocate
sufficient resources to ensure that cases were investigated
in a timely manner.
Ms. Curtis informed that there had been 11 investigative
cases that had been open for over 180 days during the audit
period, and the division had investigated all and found 7
of the cases related to the same chiropractor. The division
consolidated the 7 cases into one case and had found that
there were four unjustified periods of inactivity that
ranged from 55 days to 280 days. According to CPBL's
investigative staff, the delays were a result of
conflicting priorities and insufficient resources.
Ms. Curtis identified that management's response to the
audit began on page 21, and the commissioner of DCCED
informed that the department had moved forward to hire two
new investigative positions to improve the timeliness and
quality of investigations. She relayed that the governor's
response was on page 23. The governor agreed with
recommendation 1 and informed that the board member that
had not complied with statutory requirements had been
removed. The board chair's response was on page 25. The
board chair did not agree with the proposed five-year
extension, and believed the board was being unfairly
penalized for the audit findings that related more to CBPL
and the governor's office. The chair was requesting an
eight-year extension.
Senator Wilson asked Ms. Curtis about recommendation 1 and
the removal of the board member. He asked if the board had
taken action against any licensee that might need to be
reconsidered.
Ms. Curtis stated that the division had not specifically
looked for a case like Senator Wilson described and had not
found anything to indicate there was one.
Senator Olson noted the recommendation was for a five-year
extension, while the bill proposed a two-year extension.
Ms. Curtis was confident in the five-year extension but
recognized that policymakers might have additional
concerns. She deferred to the will of the legislature.
9:15:27 AM
Senator Hoffman asked why the sponsor was putting forward
an extension of two years, when the Division of Legislative
Audit had recommended a five-year extension.
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, SPONSOR, relayed that he had put
forward a bill with a proposed five-year extension. He
relayed that he generally agreed with the auditor unless
there was something extreme that was an outlier in the
audit. He had not felt that the issues with the
investigation were board-related and had supported the
five-year extension. The bill had been amended in another
committee.
Senator Olson asked if Senator Micciche did not agree with
the proposed two-year extension.
Senator Micciche stated that if he felt there was an issue
that was an extreme outlier that required a shortened term
below what the department suggested, he would have put a
bill in with a two-year extension. He would leave the
matter for the committee to decide. He reiterated that the
original bill was introduced with a proposed five-year
extension, which was still below the maximum. He thought
the time frame would allow adequate time for some
corrections if some needed to occur.
Co-Chair Stedman asked for discussion as to why the
previous committee had proposed only a two-year extension
rather than the five-year extension proposed in the
original bill. He reflected that past short board renewals
had been from significant problems to warrant the time
frame.
Senator Micciche thought there was a limit to what the
division could discuss, and in his view the matter was
unrelated to the board. He did not support shortening the
renewal to two years. He did not identify board issues that
would warrant only a two-year extension.
9:18:51 AM
AT EASE
9:19:11 AM
RECONVENED
SARA CHAMBERS, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS
AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, explained that the
division appreciated the legislative audit process and
always found something to learn from or improve upon as a
result. She informed that the one item of concern in the
investigation was within the purview of the division. She
could not discuss specifics of the investigation but
relayed that the matter had caught the attention of the
auditor because of the unusual nature of the case. Delays
were created because of a lack of resources as well as the
unusual way in which the case was presented. The case had
warranted work with attorneys and potential due process
issues with the respondent. She conveyed that in
retrospect, perhaps the case could have been handled
better.
Ms. Chambers offered reassurance that the case was ongoing
and there had been quite a bit of activity in the months
since the audit. She assured that the division was learning
along the way with the help of the legal team, to ensure
that the unusual case was handled in the best interest of
the people of Alaska. She cited that the pending
investigative items were more of a process issue than a
board issue or a public safety issue for the people of
Alaska.
9:22:28 AM
Senator Olson considered the investigation and asked if Ms.
Chambers anticipated that there would be disciplinary
action.
Ms. Chambers stated that the case was ongoing and in a
fact-finding phase, and the board would ultimately have to
make the decision of whether to issue discipline.
Co-Chair Bishop had a question regarding Section 2 of the
bill. He acknowledged that Ms. Curtis and staff were
overworked. He asked if the division would have the staff
and the time to complete the additional report referenced
in the bill.
Ms. Curtis relayed that the report would not be an audit,
but rather a follow-up that did not need to be conducted
according with standards and was much more efficient. She
relayed that the division had done some something similar
for the State Medical Board, when there had been similar
concerns related to an investigation and details that could
not be included in the audit. She thought the report would
not be too burdensome and could be done fairly quickly.
9:24:43 AM
AT EASE
9:25:59 AM
RECONVENED
DR. BRIAN LARSON, CHAIR, ALASKA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC
EXAMINERS, SOLDOTNA (via teleconference), spoke to SB 204.
He discussed the audit and the recommendation of the audit
committee to shorten the renewal period from 8 years to 5
years, and the subsequent bill amendment to shorten the
period to 2 years. He appreciated the confidence that the
sponsor had in requesting the extension be for five years.
He mentioned the investigation that had taken excessive
amounts of time, and the board member that was actively
working in the healthcare industry and not able to serve as
a public member of the board.
Dr. Larson detailed that the Board of Chiropractic
Examiners had four working chiropractic physicians actively
working in the field as well as a public member, and the
commission of the board was to protect the public. He noted
that the board had no opportunity to evaluate applications
for open board positions. There was no point in the process
in which the active board had the opportunity to review the
application for the public member that was invalidly
appointed. He thought the same thing had happened 8 years
previously.
Dr. Larson thought it was not realistic to hold the board
accountable for the public board member that was appointed,
nor for the investigation. He expanded that one board
member would initially review cases to determine if there
was a violation of statue or regulation, beyond which it
had no ability to monitor or determine anything about an
investigation. He requested the committee's consideration,
and that the renewal be for eight years.
9:31:09 AM
Co-Chair Bishop OPENED public testimony.
9:31:23 AM
Co-Chair Bishop CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Bishop set an amendment deadline at noon on Friday
April 1, 2022.
SB 193 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
sb204
SENATE BILL NO. 204
"An Act relating to auctions or raffles for hunting
harvest permits and big game tags; and providing for
an effective date."
9:31:52 AM
Co-Chair Bishop relayed that it was the first hearing for
SB 204. The committee intended to hear a bill introduction,
take invited and public testimony, and set the bill aside.
EMMA TORKELSON, STAFF TO SENATOR REVAK, discussed the bill.
She spoke to a Sponsor Statement (copy on file). She
relayed that since its passage in the 1997, the Governor's
Auction and Raffle Tag Program had successfully and
substantially increased funding for the wildlife
conservation programs and outdoor tradition education
efforts of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G),
and outdoor-focused organizations throughout the state. In
2021, gross revenue was just over $1.2 million.
Ms. Torkelson continued that the Senate Resources Committee
Substitute (CS) for SB 204 sought to build on this success
and expand the department's ability to bring in revenue by
adding one new species and increasing the maximum number of
permits the department could issue to be auctioned or
raffled very minimally. The funds would support wildlife
conservation and protection programs and education across
Alaska and would increase the ability to leverage
approximately $18 million in new Pittman-Robertson (PR)
funds that would be available soon. She noted that the
expansion would help ADFG to raise needed matching funds.
Ms. Torkelson informed that the bill was not the first time
that such an expansion had taken place. In 2014, HB 161 had
made similarly sized increases to the maximum number of
harvest permits that were issued, and a noticeable jump in
revenue had occurred. She cited that modern, effective
wildlife management was becoming more expensive. She used
the example of an increase of a couple of dollars to
aviation fuel, which had a major impact on survey and
inventory operations that were a key element in setting
game population and harvest objectives.
Ms. Torkelson summarized that SB 204 would allow more
federal revenue to be leveraged for critical sustainable
wildlife education and management programs and the
proactive work needed to prevent new listings under the
Endangered Species Act. She continued that SB 204 directly
supported sustainable wildlife populations, outdoor
traditions, hunters, and outdoor recreation users.
Senator Hoffman asked about page 2, line 1 through line 8
of the bill, pertaining to the McNeil River area. He asked
if the communities from the Alaska Peninsula had been
contacted and what the communities' positions were
regarding the proposed additional permits.
Ms. Torkelson had not heard that the community had reached
out to comment on the issue. She deferred to the
department.
Senator Wielechowski asked for an explanation of what was
proposed to be deleted on page 2, line 13 to line 30.
Ms. Torkelson informed that the language was proposed to be
moved to Section 4, creating new subsections (f) and (g).
She described the change as a revisor edit.
Co-Chair Bishop asked Ms. Torkelson to review the Sectional
Analysis before hearing testimony from the department.
9:36:20 AM
Ms. Torkelson addressed a Sectional Analysis document (copy
on file):
Section 1. Amends AS 16.05.343(a):
? Page 1 Lines 6-7: Adds Afognak and Raspberry Island
Herds to the type of Elk harvest permits that can be
donated by the department to be auctioned or raffled.
? Page 1 Line 6: Changes the number of harvest permits
that can be donated for Etolin, Afognak, or Raspberry
Elk herds from four to two.
? Page 1 Line 9: Adds the word "wildlife" in front of
"conservation" to clarify that the nonprofits who
qualify to receive these donated harvest permits must
be established to promote education in outdoor
traditions and "wildlife" conservation and wildlife
protection programs in partnership with the
department.
Ms. Torkelson noted that the language was standardized
throughout the rest of the bill, so all sections that
mentioned the eligibility of non-profits or how the money
could be used was the same. She continued to address the
Sectional Analysis:
Section 2. Amends 16.05.343(c):
? Page 1 Line 14 Page 2 Line 4: Removes differing
tag limits for individual species and allows up to
four harvest permits to be issued for all the listed
species.
? Page 2 Line 1: Adds "emperor goose" to the list of
available species harvest permits.
Ms. Torkelson noted that the bill prosed to increase Dall
Sheep permits by one, increased Bison permits by two. She
noted that the department retained the ability to issue
fewer permits dependent upon its biologists'
recommendations. She continued to address the Sectional
Analysis:
? Page 2 Lines 5-8: Adds four McNeil River State Game
Sanctuary bear-viewing permits to be auctioned or
raffled through the same process.
? Page 2 Lines 13-30: Removes language and replaces it
later in a new subsection (1) outlining a 70/30
revenue split between the Department of Fish and Game
and the qualified organization putting on the auction
or raffle and (2) limiting use of the funds by the
organization to approved programs and prohibiting use
of the funds for any political campaign or candidate.
This language is put back into statute in Section 4 as
subsections (f) & (g) of AS 16.05.343.
? Page 2 Lines 12 & 13, Page 3 Lines 1, 2, & 5:
Removes "big game" from any mention of "big game
harvest permit" so that all the permits are referred
to consistently by the broader "harvest permit."
? Page 3 Lines 3 & 4: Changes the inscription on the
hunting license issued under this subsection from
"Governor's license" to "Commissioner's license"
Section 3. Amends AS 16.05.343(e):
? Page 3 Line 11: Adds that a nonprofit must promote
education in "wildlife conservation" and conduct
"wildlife" conservation programs in order to qualify
as an organization that can conduct auctions or
raffles for the department. The new requirement
sentence reads: "The department may select a nonprofit
organization that promotes education in outdoor
traditions and wildlife conservation and that conducts
wildlife conservation and wildlife protection programs
Section 4. Amends AS 16.05.343 by adding new
subsections:
? Page 3 Lines 19-25: Reinserts the language removed
in Section 2 to create a new subsection (f) that
requires that all revenue earned from an auction or
raffle of harvest permits be paid to the Department of
Fish and Game EXCEPT an amount not to exceed 30%,
which the qualified organization putting on the
auction or raffle can retain for the administrative
costs of holding the auction/raffle and approved
projects and educational programs that support outdoor
tradition, wildlife conservation, and wildlife
protection.
? Page 3 Lines 26 Page 4 Line 4: Reinserts the
language removed in Section 2 to create a new
subsection (g) explicitly limiting use of the funds by
the organization to approved programs listed in (f)
and prohibiting use of the funds for any "candidate
for political office," "organization supporting or
opposing ballot propositions," and "expenses
associated with lobbying the legislature or
administration."
? Page 4 Lines 3-7: Creates a new subsection (h) which
allows winners of brown bear and Dall sheep harvest
permits to engage in the hunt even if they have
successfully taken a brown bear or Dall sheep in the
state in the four years preceding.
Section 5. Sets an effective date January 1, 2023
Senator Wilson asked about the potential financial benefit
to the state for adding the additional permits and new
Emperor Goose tag.
9:40:46 AM
EDDIE GRASSER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION,
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, conveyed that the department
believed the proposed changes would enhance its ability to
raise more funds, based on past records.
Senator Wilson asked if Mr. Grasser had an estimated dollar
amount for the estimated additional revenue.
Mr. Grasser considered that before HB 161 passed in 2014,
most years the department had raised less than $30,000 per
year for the governor's auction tag program. In 2021, the
department raised a total of $1.246 million, and the amount
seemed to be going up. He cited that for the first time in
North America, a wild sheep governor's tag sold for over
$500,000, for a Dall Sheep in Alaska.
Co-Chair Bishop asked if Mr. Grasser had anything to add.
Mr. Grasser relayed that the department had not taken a
position on the bill, but he was available to answer
questions.
Senator Hoffman knew that the McNeil River was very popular
for bear viewing for people all over the world. He asked
Mr. Grasser to share statistics for the number of people
applying to view bears in the area.
Mr. Grasser did not have the information at hand but
thought there was a set number.
Co-Chair Bishop asked if Mr. Grasser could follow up with
the committee with the information.
Mr. Grasser agreed.
Senator Hoffman asked about the route that was used to
access the McNeil River and whether people went through
Dillingham.
Mr. Grasser thought most individuals that accessed McNeil
River flew out of Homer or Anchorage.
9:43:25 AM
Co-Chair Bishop OPENED public testimony.
9:43:34 AM
Co-Chair Bishop CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Bishop noted that the amendment deadline was
Friday, April 1 at noon.
SB 204 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
9:43:52 AM
AT EASE
9:44:48 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Bishop informed that the committee would not be
meeting in the afternoon. He discussed the agenda for the
following day.
ADJOURNMENT
9:45:48 AM
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 204 Sectional Analysis 3.1.22.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM SRES 3/2/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Sponsor Statement 3.1.22.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/29/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM SRES 3/2/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Support Doc Auction-Raffle Revenue by Year 2.28.2022.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM SRES 3/2/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Support Letter SCI-AK 3.1.22.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/29/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM SRES 3/2/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Testimony RHAK 2.14.22.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Testimony APHA 3.2.22.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/29/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 S FIN SB 204 Support SCI-AK 3.25.22.pdf |
HRES 4/29/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |
| SB 190 v. I Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 190 v. I Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 190 Support Document- Legislative Audit RCA Sunset Review 9.21.21.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 190 Work Draft ver. G 03.22.2022.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 190 Explanation of Changes ver. I to G 03.22.2022.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 193 Sponsor Statement V I.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 193 |
| SB 193 Audit Summary.pdf |
HL&C 4/25/2022 3:15:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 193 |
| SB 193 Full Audit.pdf |
HL&C 4/25/2022 3:15:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 193 |
| SB 193_Letter of Support.pdf |
HL&C 4/25/2022 3:15:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 193 |
| SB 193 Explanation of Changes version B to I.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 193 |
| SB 190 Explanation of Changes ver. I to W 03.25.2022.pdf |
HL&C 4/25/2022 3:15:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 190 Work Draft ver. W 03.25.2022.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 190 |
| SB 204 Updated Sectional Analysis Version W 3.29.22.pdf |
HRES 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/29/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |
| SB 204 ADFG Committee Response 4.4.22.pdf |
SFIN 3/30/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 204 |