Legislature(2005 - 2006)BUTROVICH 205
02/13/2006 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB213 | |
| HB37 | |
| SB203 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 166 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 37 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 203 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 213 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 203-UNIFIED PERMIT APPLICATION
CHAIR THOMAS WAGONER announced SB 203 to be up for
consideration.
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS, sponsor of SB 203, said she wanted to
create a one-stop online permitting system whenever two or more
agencies need to permit a project. SB 203 breaks her proposal
down into two phases, one for each year. The first phase would
be for designing the permit application and the second for
development of the online system. She explained that Legislative
Legal did not like the language on page 9 that excluded De
Minimus projects that require only a standard condition, but she
did not intend to include small permits, but rather to target
developments where people have to go to multiple agencies for
permits.
4:44:50 PM
SENATOR BERT STEDMAN moved to adopt Amendment 1.
A M E N D M E N T 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR GUESS
TO: SB 203
Page 1, line 4, through page 2, line 22:
Delete all material.
Page 2, line 23:
Delete "Sec. 5"
Insert "Section 1"
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 9, following line 6:
Insert a new paragraph to read:
"(3) a limited entry permit under AS 16.43;"
Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly.
CHAIR WAGONER announced that there were no objections and
Amendment 1 was adopted.
SENATOR STEDMAN asked how the departments would work together
under SB 203.
SENATOR GUESS replied that she hoped that there wouldn't be turf
battles and that people would look for common elements, not
diversity. It might not be easy on the departments nor
inexpensive, but the State of Alaska would be viewed as being
open for business. The focus would be on writing the correct
permit for the area and, "Not trying to get someone through the
hurdles of paperwork."
4:47:28 PM
DICK MYLIUS, Director, Division of Mining, Land and Water,
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), said he was available to
answer questions.
RANDY BATES, Acting Director, Office of Project Management and
Permitting, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), said that
ADF&G, DNR and DEC supported the concept of permit streamlining,
but did not support SB 203 for three reasons. The first reason
was that the unified permit application concept as proposed
fails for practical reasons; secondly, the departments are
already streamlining their application process; and thirdly, the
financial support is not available to implement the bill.
4:49:43 PM
SENATOR ELTON said it makes sense for people to apply on line.
MR. BATES replied that it makes sense and DEC is moving towards
online permit applications and DNR is developing an online
coastal project questionnaire for an online permit specific to
two of its agencies. The interactive application is a four-year
project that will cost a little more than $4 million.
SENATOR ELTON pointed out that he didn't disagree with this part
of the bill, but language on page 6 talks about permit
application information on the Internet being done within one
year rather than four. He asked if he disagreed with just the
deadlines.
MR. BATES responded that a one-year deadline is a worthy goal,
but it is difficult to fill out 30 or 40 applications in the
confines of one year.
SENATOR ELTON replied that he thought that was why this bill was
needed - if all those applications were going to be done by
paper.
4:53:58 PM
CHAIR WAGONER said that the Alaska Mining Association was real
hesitant about this bill because the process is already working
for them. They are getting their permits in a timely fashion and
would rather rely on proven technology, not new technology.
4:55:12 PM
SENATOR GUESS responded that just because one industry or one
group of people in Alaska is familiar with the process doesn't
mean that it is the best process, especially when the state is
trying to encourage new entrants into the market. She wanted to
make clear for the record that SB 203 is not changing the permit
process, but it is changing the application process. She
emphasized that permits would not be written differently. She
has asked DNR for any suggested changes, but she hadn't received
any at this time, but she had received suggestions from ADF&G.
She thought that creating one unified online application made
more sense than creating three different online application
systems. The current databases refer to the same elements as
different things. She remarked:
I don't think we have an efficient system right now
and I think it would behoove the state to move towards
it.... Although it might fail for practical reasons
now, I don't think it fails for practical reasons in
our future.
CHAIR WAGONER stated that he would hold the bill and address it
again later and adjourned the meeting at 4:58:49 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|