Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/17/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB284 | |
| Confirmations | |
| SB284 | |
| SB297 | |
| SB202 | |
| SB284 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 202 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 297 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 284 | ||
SB 202-HATE CRIMES
2:28:06 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 202 and asked for
a motion to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS).
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt the judiciary work draft CS
for SB 202, labeled 26-LS1097\E, as the working document. There
being no objection, version E was before the committee.
CHAIR FRENCH explained that the CS was prepared at his request
to add "gender identity" to the list of improper objects of
crime. It provides a definition of gender identity and adds it
to the aggravator statute for the same reason that sexual
orientation was added.
2:29:29 PM
THOMAS OBERMEYER, Staff to Senator Bettye Davis, sponsor of SB
202, said the CS is appropriate.
CHAIR FRENCH asked for committee discussion or a motion.
SENATOR EGAN moved to report CS for SB 202 from committee [with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s).]
SENATOR COGHILL objected. He expressed the view that the crimes
that are currently on the books already include these crimes
that are based on motivation of prejudice, bias or hatred. He
said he agrees that if it were law it should be in the
aggravator statute, but he isn't ready to go there yet.
2:31:50 PM
CHAIR FRENCH said that as a former prosecutor he is very
familiar with the idea of proving an individual's intent to a
jury and it is not easy. Because it is so difficult to prove
intent, he believes that this statute would be used extremely
infrequently should this become law. He pointed out that before
anyone would be convicted of this crime, a jury would have to
decide unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt that the
individual's conduct was directed at the victim for the reasons
listed in the statute.
A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed 3:2 with
Senators Wielechowski, Egan, and French voting yea and Senators
Coghill and McGuire voting nay. Therefore, CSSB 202(JUD) moved
from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|