Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/04/2024 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation: Personnel Board | |
| SB201 | |
| SB177 | |
| SB262 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 177 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 201-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
3:51:16 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 201 "An Act establishing the
office of information technology; relating to information
technology projects undertaken by state agencies; and providing
for an effective date."
3:51:48 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI solicited a motion.
3:51:53 PM
SENATOR MERRICK move to adopt the committee substitute (CS) for
SB 201, work draft 33-LS1014\S, as the working document.
3:52:29 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI objected for purposes of discussion.
3:52:37 PM
MATTHEW HARVEY, Staff, Senator James Kaufman, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented the summary of changes
for SB 201:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Summary of Changes for SB 201 Bill Version B to S
Page 1, Lines 10-14 and Page 2, Lines 1-16: Adding
duties of the office and director that were included
in the initial Administrative Order 284 relating to
operational duties. These duties include language
related to policy and procedure adherence, enterprise
architecture, IT security, employment of a Chief
Information Security Officer (CISO), and inventory of
all computer equipment.
Page 3, Line 11: Adds reference to the new
"exemptions" section.
Page 3, Lines 30-31: Adds reference to the new
"exemptions" section.
Page 6, Lines 12-31 and Page 7, Lines 1-19: Adds a new
section allowing OIT and state agencies to enter into
exemption agreements.
Section (a) allows for broad exemption agreements. The
agreements must:
• Require the state agency to abide by either OIT's
project management and IT processes, those
processes with a defined list of variations, or
state agency processes defined in the agreement.
• Include a plan for the state agency to fulfill
obligations with contractors.
• Allow the state agency to designate a project
manager.
• Require the state agency to submit periodic
reports to the director including updates to the
state agency's biennial information technology
plan.
Section (b) allows for project-specific exemption
agreements detailing the "what, why, and how" of
specific requirements agreed to be waived.
Section (c) provides a process in the case of an
unwillingness to sign exemption agreements including
justification and an appeal process.
Section (d) requires copies of these agreements to be
included in biennial information technology plans and
delivered to the legislature.
Page 7, Line 20: Adds reference to the new
"exemptions" section.
Page 8, Line 9: Redefines "State Agency" to exclude
the Alaska Railroad Corporation, the University of
Alaska, and agencies of the judicial or legislative
branches of government.
3:55:04 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI inquired about the $5 million exemption, asking
for clarification on why that specific amount was chosen. He
questioned whether it reflects typical costs or if there is
another rationale behind selecting that figure.
3:55:17 PM
MR. HARVEY referred to SB 201, version B, page 5, line 19 and
explained that the $5 million exemption distinguishes between
major and minor information technology projects. He noted that
major IT projects fall under the purview of the Office of
Information Technology, which has slightly different
requirements, while minor IT projects can be managed more
closely and independently by the state agency undertaking them.
3:56:04 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI removed his objection.
3:56:35 PM
SENATOR JAMES KAUFMAN, District F, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, expressed gratitude to everyone who contributed
to the various changes for SB 201 that provide flexibility while
still promoting standardization, which will benefit the state.
CHAIR KAWASAKI solicited the will of the committee.
3:57:21 PM
SENATOR MERRICK moved to report CSSB 201, work order 33-
LS1014\S, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
3:57:43 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI found no objection and CSSB 201 was reported from
the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CS SB 201.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |
| CS SB 177.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
| SB0262A.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |
| SB 262 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |
| SB 262 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |