Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/04/2024 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Confirmation: Personnel Board | |
SB201 | |
SB177 | |
SB262 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 177 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 201-OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 3:51:16 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI reconvened the meeting and announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 201 "An Act establishing the office of information technology; relating to information technology projects undertaken by state agencies; and providing for an effective date." 3:51:48 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI solicited a motion. 3:51:53 PM SENATOR MERRICK move to adopt the committee substitute (CS) for SB 201, work draft 33-LS1014\S, as the working document. 3:52:29 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI objected for purposes of discussion. 3:52:37 PM MATTHEW HARVEY, Staff, Senator James Kaufman, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented the summary of changes for SB 201: [Original punctuation provided.] Summary of Changes for SB 201 Bill Version B to S Page 1, Lines 10-14 and Page 2, Lines 1-16: Adding duties of the office and director that were included in the initial Administrative Order 284 relating to operational duties. These duties include language related to policy and procedure adherence, enterprise architecture, IT security, employment of a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), and inventory of all computer equipment. Page 3, Line 11: Adds reference to the new "exemptions" section. Page 3, Lines 30-31: Adds reference to the new "exemptions" section. Page 6, Lines 12-31 and Page 7, Lines 1-19: Adds a new section allowing OIT and state agencies to enter into exemption agreements. Section (a) allows for broad exemption agreements. The agreements must: • Require the state agency to abide by either OIT's project management and IT processes, those processes with a defined list of variations, or state agency processes defined in the agreement. • Include a plan for the state agency to fulfill obligations with contractors. • Allow the state agency to designate a project manager. • Require the state agency to submit periodic reports to the director including updates to the state agency's biennial information technology plan. Section (b) allows for project-specific exemption agreements detailing the "what, why, and how" of specific requirements agreed to be waived. Section (c) provides a process in the case of an unwillingness to sign exemption agreements including justification and an appeal process. Section (d) requires copies of these agreements to be included in biennial information technology plans and delivered to the legislature. Page 7, Line 20: Adds reference to the new "exemptions" section. Page 8, Line 9: Redefines "State Agency" to exclude the Alaska Railroad Corporation, the University of Alaska, and agencies of the judicial or legislative branches of government. 3:55:04 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI inquired about the $5 million exemption, asking for clarification on why that specific amount was chosen. He questioned whether it reflects typical costs or if there is another rationale behind selecting that figure. 3:55:17 PM MR. HARVEY referred to SB 201, version B, page 5, line 19 and explained that the $5 million exemption distinguishes between major and minor information technology projects. He noted that major IT projects fall under the purview of the Office of Information Technology, which has slightly different requirements, while minor IT projects can be managed more closely and independently by the state agency undertaking them. 3:56:04 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI removed his objection. 3:56:35 PM SENATOR JAMES KAUFMAN, District F, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, expressed gratitude to everyone who contributed to the various changes for SB 201 that provide flexibility while still promoting standardization, which will benefit the state. CHAIR KAWASAKI solicited the will of the committee. 3:57:21 PM SENATOR MERRICK moved to report CSSB 201, work order 33- LS1014\S, from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). 3:57:43 PM CHAIR KAWASAKI found no objection and CSSB 201 was reported from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
CS SB 201.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |
CS SB 177.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
SB0262A.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |
SB 262 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |
SB 262 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
SSTA 4/4/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 262 |