Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/28/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB47 | |
| HB218 | |
| SB201 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 47 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 218 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 201-CRIMINAL TRESPASS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
2:39:51 PM
CHAIR COGHILL reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SB 201. "An Act relating to the crime of
trespass." He noted this was the second hearing and there was a
new committee substitute (CS).
2:40:08 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE moved to adopt the work draft CS for SB 201,
labeled 28-LS1470\U, for discussion purposes.
CHAIR COGHILL objected for discussion purposes.
2:40:37 PM
DARWIN PETERSON, Staff, Senator Bert Stedman, Alaska State
Legislature Juneau, Alaska, explained that the original version
of SB 201 deleted AS 11.46.350(b) and (c), which would
essentially eliminate the need to post a "no trespassing" sign
in order to keep people off your private property. The committee
substitute (CS) now deletes just AS 11.46.350(c), which is the
description of what the "no trespassing" sign should look like
and specifies where the sign has to be placed on the property.
Under the CS, a private landowner would have to post a "no
trespassing" sign on his/her property but there wouldn't be a
requirement that it's posted at every possible entry point to
the property.
CHAIR COGHILL said he brought the CS forward because the current
statute imposes huge liability on the property owner because the
posting requirements are so technical and exacting. The simple
requirements to personally communicate or post are reasonable,
he said.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how the courts have defined
"reasonably conspicuous manner" and what that requires for
trespass signs.
MR. PETERSON offered to follow up with the definition.
CHAIR COGHILL said he would make sure the answer was distributed
to all the committee members.
2:44:11 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,
sponsor of SB 201, summarized that the intent of the bill is to
have the private property owner post a "no trespassing" sign,
but not require one to be posted on every access point. He
stated support for the CS saying that it makes a better bill.
CHAIR COGHILL removed his objection.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked what the penalty is for trespassing.
MR. PETERSON replied it's a class B misdemeanor.
CHAIR COGHILL asked what level of proof is needed for a
misdemeanor.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI answered it's beyond a reasonable doubt. He
then asked if the Castle Doctrine extends to property or just a
person's house.
MR. PETERSON said he didn't know.
2:47:48 PM
CHAIR COGHILL found no further questions or objection and stated
that Version U was adopted. He solicited a motion.
2:47:56 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE moved to report CS for SB 201, Version U, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s).
CHAIR COGHILL announced that without objection, CSSB 201(JUD)
passes from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSSB 201.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |
| HB 218 Amendment.PDF |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 218 |
| HB 47 - Written Testimony.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 47 |
| Written Testimony - SB 201.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |