Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
04/16/2014 09:00 AM House RULES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB200 | |
| SB201 | |
| HB287 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 200 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 287 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 200-WRONGFUL DEATH OF AN UNBORN CHILD
9:04:01 AM
CHAIR JOHNSON announced that the first order of business would
be SENATE BILL NO. 200, "An Act establishing a right of action
for the death of an unborn child in certain circumstances."
9:04:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON moved to adopt the proposed House committee
substitute (HCS) for SB 200, Version 28-LS1382\U, Wallace,
4/11/4, as the working document.
CHAIR JOHNSON objected for discussion purposes.
9:04:41 AM
AMY SALTZMAN, Staff, Senator Lesil McGuire, Alaska State
Legislature, speaking on behalf of the sponsor, Senator McGuire,
paraphrased from the following written sponsor statement
[original punctuation provided]:
There is no loss more devastating than the loss of a
child, no matter the child's age. Currently Alaskan
families have no civil recourse when suffering the
loss of an unborn child through the unlawful or
negligent actions of another person. Senate Bill 200,
also known as "Jackson's Law" is a long overdue
response to the heartbreaking stories of families who
have suffered such a loss.
In 2006 a law was passed to change the criminal
liability for the death of an unborn child. That law
established that the unborn can be victims of murder,
manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in a
criminal court. Jackson's Law would mirror that law,
allowing Alaskan families and parents the same civil
recognition of their loss.
Alaska is one of only ten states that do not allow the
parents of an unborn victim to seek accountability or
damages from a guilty party. Although no compensation
could ever account for the loss of parents and
families, this bill will provide families with
recognition and a course for healing.
9:05:41 AM
CHAIR JOHNSON inquired as to the differences between SB 200 and
the proposed committee substitute, HCS SB 200, Version U.
9:06:00 AM
MS. SALTZMAN explained that it came to the sponsor's attention
that in some civil cases there is the ability for families to
seek action for the wrongful death of an unborn child using AS
09.15.010 such that the parent or guardian may sue for injuries
or death of a child. However, the issue is that the term
"unborn" isn't included in that statute, and thus is left to the
court's interpretation. Therefore, [SB 200] would clarify that
[Jackson's] law exists and will be available for cases going
forward. The changes embodied in Version U reflect that, she
said. She then pointed out that on page 1, line 1, the title of
SB 200 was amended by deleting the language "establishing a
right" and inserting "relating". On page 2, lines 5-6,
subsection (c) was inserted; subsection (c) clarifies that if
another action was sought, this law is separate. On page 2,
lines 10-13, a new section was inserted to clarify that this
legislation applies to cases that occur on or after the
effective date not existing cases.
9:08:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG noted that this legislation is similar
to HB 258 heard in the House Judiciary Standing Committee. He
characterized the changes as good. However, he recalled that
the Wrongful Death Act, AS 09.15.015, refers to "parent or
guardian" but a "guardian" doesn't apply to an unborn child.
Therefore, he inquired as to what would happen in a case in
which the father, the pregnant mother, and fetus are killed.
Per Megan Wallace, Attorney, Legal Services, Legislative Legal
and Research, the survival statute, AS 09.55.570, provides that
if someone doesn't survive, then a personal represented is
appointed. Therefore, if the parents died in the same action as
the unborn child, any claim that could've been maintained by the
parent would survive and could be brought by the personal
representative. He also recalled that the judge in the case of
Mace v. Jung, 210 F.Supp 706 (U.S. District Court Alaska 1962),
in which there was a motion to dismiss for the death of a
nonviable unborn child, adopted the rule and applied that an
action could not be maintained for a nonviable unborn child.
This proposed law will effectively reverse that case, he pointed
out. Representative Gruenberg related his support for SB 200.
9:11:23 AM
CHAIR JOHNSON removed his objection. There being no further
objection, Version U was before the committee.
9:11:39 AM
CHAIR JOHNSON opened public testimony and upon determining that
no one wished to testify, closed public testimony.
9:11:57 AM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON moved to report the proposed House
committee substitute (HCS) for SB 200, Version 28-LS1382\U,
Wallace, 4/11/4, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being
no objection, HCS SB 200(RLS) was reported from the House Rules
Standing Committee and is available for calendaring.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB0201A.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201B.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| CSSB 201(JUD) Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB 201 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-1-2-033114-ADM-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-2-2-033114-ADM-Y.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-3-2-033114-COR-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-4-2-033114-DPS-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-5-2-033114-DPS-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-6-2-033114-LAW-Y.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-7-2-040814-ADM-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB0201-8-2-040814-COR-N.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| HB 287 Amendment GH2862.N.2.pdf |
HRLS 4/16/2014 9:00:00 AM |
HB 287 |