Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
03/01/2024 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB199 | |
SB171 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 199-STATE LAND: DISPOSAL/SALE/LEASE/RESTRICT 3:32:16 PM CO-CHAIR BISHOP announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 199 "An Act relating to access roads; relating to state land; relating to contracts for the sale of state land; relating to the authority of the Department of Education and Early Development to dispose of state land; relating to the authority of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to dispose of state land; relating to the authority of the Department of Natural Resources over certain state land; relating to the state land disposal income fund; relating to the sale and lease of state land; relating to covenants and restrictions on agricultural land; and providing for an effective date." 3:32:19 PM CO-CHAIR BISHOP opened public testimony on SB 199. 3:33:03 PM JOHN SONIN, representing self, Juneau, Alaska, testified in opposition to SB 199. He said he represents civilized humanity and expressed his belief that in order to remain civil, people must have the ability to tend to themselves. People's wellbeing requires a stable system, which cannot adequately function under a capitalistic structure. Alaska, a place long known for its stability, is now facing instability due to the pursuit of profit through private control. The current system demands energy but fails to give back, ultimately destabilizing itself. He stated his belief that public lands are the last hope to slow down the system's breakdown as society ages, but the situation is worsening. He urged prioritizing preserving and conserving public lands, while resisting the push for privatization driven by capital interests. In essence, leasing or disposing of public lands is detrimental to the well-being and sanity of humanity. 3:36:20 PM LEONARDO WASSILIE, representing self, Nenana, Alaska, testified in opposition to SB 199. He expressed opposition to the utilization of public resources by private interests. The U.S. was founded on the principle of public land ownership. He highlighted the significance of land as a shared resource utilized by communities to contribute to local economies. Selling public lands to private parties goes against the intended purpose. He expressed hope that concerns regarding external control over significant state resources are acknowledged. This type of mechanism facilitates external control, leading to corporate dominance over public resources. He emphasized the importance of considering the impact of outside interests on local communities. 3:39:00 PM MORGAN ALDRIDGE, representing self, Soldotna, Alaska, testified in opposition to SB 199. She expressed concerns about the consequences of making public land available. She said the disposal of public lands may not align with the constitution and could compromise transparency. 3:39:54 PM KATIE ROOKS, representing self, Prince of Wales, Alaska, testified in opposition to SB 199. She said she has worked in every level of government and now works for a regional non- profit. She expressed concerns about SB 199, which she believes would expand government authority regarding the disposal of public lands by allowing two additional state departments, the Department of Education (DOE) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), to directly sell or lease public lands to private entities for commercial development. Currently, these departments are limited to government-to-government transactions, but the bill would remove this requirement. SB 199 would also extend lease terms by ten years, potentially reducing monthly payment rates. This would favor industry at the expense of Alaska's interests, while the state should be recouping all it can from wealthy industrial owners and operators. The bill would also permit the sale of public land at 30 percent below fair market value under the guise of using best-interest findings. However, best-interest findings are already grossly misused in the state. She cited Prince of Wales as an example, which has demonstrated the misuse of best-interest findings through timber sale among other issues. The bill would expand the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) authority to identify and reclassify public lands for sale to commercial developers. She argued that this undermines the public land and resource management process and prioritizes the interests of commercial buyers over Alaskans. Classifications like 'Wildlife Habitat' and 'recreational settlement' would lose their significance, as the state could alter public lands without considering public input or longstanding classifications. 3:42:05 PM THOMAS PEASE, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified with concerns about SB 199. He expressed concerns about Section 3 under SB 199 and said the provision outlines how the DOT would dispose of land. He urged the committee to remove this section from the bill considering its potential for misuse of public resources. Section 3 grants unlimited authority to the Commissioner of DOT to dispose of public land if the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) does not act within 45 days, without spelling out a process or placing restrictions on the DOT commissioner. He emphasized that any responsible land disposal process should prioritize the highest and best use of the resource, requiring transparency, fairness, and competitiveness. However, Section 3 of SB 199 would grant sole authority to the DOT commissioner, a political appointee, while excluding public involvement entirely. He noted the absence of maps or an inventory of DOT lands that are available to the public, which would be useful for understanding the potential impact of the legislation. He questioned the necessity of changing the current DOT land disposal process since the department is primarily intended for road development rather than land disposal, whereas DNR employs professional land managers. He concluded by urging the committee to omit Section 3 from SB 199. 3:44:35 PM ADAM CUTHRIELL, representing self, Girdwood, Alaska, testified in opposition to SB 199. He said SB 199 poses a risk to Alaska and its public lands. SB 199 would jeopardize significant economic revenue for the state, impacting activities including hunting, fishing, and tourism. 3:45:42 PM CO-CHAIR BISHOP closed public testimony. CO-CHAIR BISHOP held SB 199 for future consideration.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 199 DNR Response to SRES 02.21.2024.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 199 |
SB 171 DPS Fiscal Note 02.23.25.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
SB 171 Support Letter RHAK.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
SB 171 Support Resolution Haines Borough.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
SB 199 Public Testimony as of 03.01.24.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 199 |