Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
03/01/2024 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB199 | |
| SB171 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 199-STATE LAND: DISPOSAL/SALE/LEASE/RESTRICT
3:32:16 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO.
199 "An Act relating to access roads; relating to state land;
relating to contracts for the sale of state land; relating to
the authority of the Department of Education and Early
Development to dispose of state land; relating to the authority
of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to
dispose of state land; relating to the authority of the
Department of Natural Resources over certain state land;
relating to the state land disposal income fund; relating to the
sale and lease of state land; relating to covenants and
restrictions on agricultural land; and providing for an
effective date."
3:32:19 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP opened public testimony on SB 199.
3:33:03 PM
JOHN SONIN, representing self, Juneau, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 199. He said he represents civilized humanity
and expressed his belief that in order to remain civil, people
must have the ability to tend to themselves. People's wellbeing
requires a stable system, which cannot adequately function under
a capitalistic structure. Alaska, a place long known for its
stability, is now facing instability due to the pursuit of
profit through private control. The current system demands
energy but fails to give back, ultimately destabilizing itself.
He stated his belief that public lands are the last hope to slow
down the system's breakdown as society ages, but the situation
is worsening. He urged prioritizing preserving and conserving
public lands, while resisting the push for privatization driven
by capital interests. In essence, leasing or disposing of public
lands is detrimental to the well-being and sanity of humanity.
3:36:20 PM
LEONARDO WASSILIE, representing self, Nenana, Alaska, testified
in opposition to SB 199. He expressed opposition to the
utilization of public resources by private interests. The U.S.
was founded on the principle of public land ownership. He
highlighted the significance of land as a shared resource
utilized by communities to contribute to local economies.
Selling public lands to private parties goes against the
intended purpose. He expressed hope that concerns regarding
external control over significant state resources are
acknowledged. This type of mechanism facilitates external
control, leading to corporate dominance over public resources.
He emphasized the importance of considering the impact of
outside interests on local communities.
3:39:00 PM
MORGAN ALDRIDGE, representing self, Soldotna, Alaska, testified
in opposition to SB 199. She expressed concerns about the
consequences of making public land available. She said the
disposal of public lands may not align with the constitution and
could compromise transparency.
3:39:54 PM
KATIE ROOKS, representing self, Prince of Wales, Alaska,
testified in opposition to SB 199. She said she has worked in
every level of government and now works for a regional non-
profit. She expressed concerns about SB 199, which she believes
would expand government authority regarding the disposal of
public lands by allowing two additional state departments, the
Department of Education (DOE) and the Department of
Transportation (DOT), to directly sell or lease public lands to
private entities for commercial development. Currently, these
departments are limited to government-to-government
transactions, but the bill would remove this requirement. SB 199
would also extend lease terms by ten years, potentially reducing
monthly payment rates. This would favor industry at the expense
of Alaska's interests, while the state should be recouping all
it can from wealthy industrial owners and operators. The bill
would also permit the sale of public land at 30 percent below
fair market value under the guise of using best-interest
findings. However, best-interest findings are already grossly
misused in the state. She cited Prince of Wales as an example,
which has demonstrated the misuse of best-interest findings
through timber sale among other issues. The bill would expand
the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR)
authority to identify and reclassify public lands for sale to
commercial developers. She argued that this undermines the
public land and resource management process and prioritizes the
interests of commercial buyers over Alaskans. Classifications
like 'Wildlife Habitat' and 'recreational settlement' would lose
their significance, as the state could alter public lands
without considering public input or longstanding
classifications.
3:42:05 PM
THOMAS PEASE, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified
with concerns about SB 199. He expressed concerns about Section
3 under SB 199 and said the provision outlines how the DOT would
dispose of land. He urged the committee to remove this section
from the bill considering its potential for misuse of public
resources. Section 3 grants unlimited authority to the
Commissioner of DOT to dispose of public land if the Department
of Natural Resources (DNR) does not act within 45 days, without
spelling out a process or placing restrictions on the DOT
commissioner. He emphasized that any responsible land disposal
process should prioritize the highest and best use of the
resource, requiring transparency, fairness, and competitiveness.
However, Section 3 of SB 199 would grant sole authority to the
DOT commissioner, a political appointee, while excluding public
involvement entirely. He noted the absence of maps or an
inventory of DOT lands that are available to the public, which
would be useful for understanding the potential impact of the
legislation. He questioned the necessity of changing the current
DOT land disposal process since the department is primarily
intended for road development rather than land disposal, whereas
DNR employs professional land managers. He concluded by urging
the committee to omit Section 3 from SB 199.
3:44:35 PM
ADAM CUTHRIELL, representing self, Girdwood, Alaska, testified
in opposition to SB 199. He said SB 199 poses a risk to Alaska
and its public lands. SB 199 would jeopardize significant
economic revenue for the state, impacting activities including
hunting, fishing, and tourism.
3:45:42 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP closed public testimony.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP held SB 199 for future consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 199 DNR Response to SRES 02.21.2024.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 199 |
| SB 171 DPS Fiscal Note 02.23.25.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB 171 Support Letter RHAK.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB 171 Support Resolution Haines Borough.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB 199 Public Testimony as of 03.01.24.pdf |
SRES 3/1/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SB 199 |