Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/13/1996 03:50 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 198 HOMER AIRPORT CRITICAL HAB. AREA
SENATOR PEARCE announced SB 198 to be up for consideration.
SENATOR FRANK moved to adopt the K version CS to SB 198. There
were no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR TORGERSON, sponsor, explained that there were three
changes. One was a new purpose section for moose habitat and for
guaranteed public access, revisions of boundaries, and new language
in section 2 reflecting the stated purpose, inserting on page 6,
line 26. The plan is to guarantee access and continued public
fishing, hunting, and trapping activities and opportunities in the
area. He said these changes are a direct result of the public
hearing he and Senator Leman had in Homer.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if this would comport with Senator Miller's
bill on no net loss. SENATOR TORGERSON replied no.
Number 100
SENATOR PEARCE asked what the FAA restrictions were in terms of
hunting. SENATOR TORGERSON explained this was within the city
limits of Homer and discharge of firearms is prohibited, but bow
hunting is not.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked why they can't manage the habitat for the
benefit of the moose today. SENATOR TORGERSON answered he thought
it was because they don't have access to the airport given to them
by DOT or FAA.
SENATOR FRANK asked about the critical habitat designation. He
asked if they had to have the word critical in there. SENATOR
TORGERSON replied that he wasn't sure.
GERON BRUCE, ADF&G, said there is a definition of critical habitat.
The basic idea is that these areas are managed for multiple use,
but by declaring them a critical habitat area, other activities in
that area must be compatible with the protection of fish and
wildlife habitat and other human uses. This does not exclude
development.
SENATOR FRANK asked if the words critical habitat area are defined
in law and require a certain management regime. MR. BRUCE replied
that the purposes for the habitat areas are defined in law and then
there is a regulatory framework that defines the general procedures
for how to get a permit to do things in a critical habitat area.
Some of the areas have specific management plans that have been
adopted.
Number 169
SENATOR TAYLOR asked why the purpose section talks about providing
an area for enhancing winter browse for the moose herd on the lower
Kenai. MR. BRUCE said he didn't know for sure, but he thought that
was from input from people in Homer who are interested in doing
some volunteer work in that area to improve the browse for the
moose who spend their winters there.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if there was something preventing the people
from enhancing the winter browse for moose in that area today. MR.
BRUCE said no fish and game statute would prohibit that, but once
this is declared a critical habitat area, those kinds of activities
are encouraged and might result in some changes in cooperative
agreements.
SENATOR TAYLOR commented that he didn't want declaring it a
critical habitat area to prevent them from enhancing the area
because it would require a permit and a hearing. He didn't want to
prevent them from doing what they are free to do right now.
SENATOR TORGERSON said this was discussed and the feeling is that
permits are required now and access is required from DOT. Once
they do that, though, they want continual use of that land and this
sets it aside for that purpose. DOT might be more of a yearly
thing.
Number 200
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if DOT was going to invest funds in
enhancement. MR. BRUCE replied no that the local folks are
interested in doing enhancement on a volunteer basis.
Number 234
SENATOR HALFORD asked the reason for the outholdings. SENATOR
TORGERSON explained that the two triangles are where the Aleutian
Tern nesting area is. The residents wanted this area set aside
because this is kind of a rare species of tern.
Number 256
SENATOR FRANK moved to pass CS for SB 198 (RES) with individual
recommendations along with the accompanying fiscal note. There
were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|