Legislature(2019 - 2020)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/10/2020 03:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB194 | |
| SB218 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 194 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 218 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 194-ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTORS
3:34:28 PM
CHAIR BISHOP announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 194,
"An Act relating to advanced nuclear reactors." He noted that
there was a committee substitute (CS) to consider.
3:34:41 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE moved to adopt the CS for SB 194, work order
31-LS0878\M, as the working document.
CHAIR BISHOP objected for discussion purposes and explanation of
changes.
3:35:03 PM
CODY GRUSSENDORF, Staff, Senator Click Bishop, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, paraphrased the following
explanation of changes from version A to version M for S 194:
• Page 1, lines 10-13:
o Adds a 300-megawatt (MW) ceiling exemption to the
amount of power generated for an advanced nuclear
reactor classification.
o The ceiling exempts a reactor from the land
designation requirement by the legislature in Section
1(b).
• Page 2, line 2:
o The CS removes language referring to the most recent
generation of reactors.
o The CS inserts a date: January 1, 2020.
• Page 2, line 19:
o The CS inserts a date: January 1, 2020.
3:35:28 PM
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON joined the committee meeting.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked what the significance is for the 300 MW
ceiling.
MR. GRUSSENDORF answered that 300 MW is the U.S. Department of
Energy's (DOE) standard definition of a small modular reactor.
The bill is about small reactors and does not intend to exempt
gigawatt reactors from the legislative site designation.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked what would happen if DOE changed the 300
MW definition to a larger size.
MR. GRUSSENDORF conceded that he did not know if the 300 MW will
hold true in the future, but the designs and definitions by DOE
are for small reactors below 300 MW.
SENATOR MICCICHE remarked that the legislature could always
change the MW ceiling if there is a reason to do so.
3:37:27 PM
CHAIR BISHOP opened public testimony for SB 194.
3:37:37 PM
GEORGE ROE, Research Professor, Alaska Center of Energy and
Power (ACEP), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Seattle,
Washington, testified in support of SB 194. He said the
definition of a small reactor and the magnitude Mr. Grussendorf
described is very consistent with DOE. Analysis by ACEP
indicates that the scale of small reactor utilization might be
best matched for private, federal, and community applications in
the state for combinations of heat and power.
He detailed that the University of Alaska received state funding
to complete a study in 2010 on small modular reactor
capabilities that identified applications within the state that
could warrant future investigation. ACEP believes that an
updated study may be appropriate to refine and enhance the 2010
roadmap. An updated study would provide an assessment of current
technology as well as the evolution of the energy systems in
Alaska.
3:39:10 PM
SENATOR HOFFMAN pointed out that the committee discussed the
need for an updated study during the previous bill hearing. He
suggested that the committee send a letter outlining this need
to the capital budget chair for consideration. He said an
updated study would fit hand in glove with what U.S. Senator
Murkowski is doing on the national level.
SENATOR MICCICHE said the capacity or generating potential for
many Alaska communities would be much smaller than 300 MW. He
asked Mr. Roe if there is a break below 300 MW that would have a
different definition in the future.
MR. ROE agreed that most applications in Alaska would require a
smaller reactor. However, the 300 MW demarcation in the bill is
useful to avoid the need for continuous revisions. In many
situations, a reactor on the order of 3-10 MW would be
appropriate for Alaska Railbelt and U.S. Department of Defense
applications. Updated analysis would identify the best capacity
alignment for possible community analysis. Larger reactors that
require infield refueling could serve the Railbelt. However,
containerized microreactors with a 1-10 MW threshold could serve
as a complete system without infield fuel replacement for
possible community applications.
3:42:28 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE asked about FERC's position on the change to
the requirement for a legislative siting permit for a 300 MW
reactor and if there would continue to be a site requirement for
any sized nuclear reactor.
MR. ROE answered that he did not know, but ACEP was willing to
do research on the inquiry.
CHAIR BISHOP advised that the Senate Resources Standing
Committee was the next committee of referral and the question
could be answered there.
3:43:32 PM
CHAIR BISHOP removed his objection to the CS for SB 194 and
closed public testimony.
3:43:45 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE moved to report the CS for SB 194, work order
31-LS0878\M, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached zero fiscal note.
CHAIR BISHOP found no objection and CSSB 194(CRA) was reported
from the Senate Community and Regional Affairs Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 194 Draft CS ver. M.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 Explanation of Changes ver A to M.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SCRA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 194 DRAFT Fiscal Note DEC-CO 03-02-2020.pdf |
SCRA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| SB 218 Sponsor Statement 3.2.2020.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/17/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 218 |
| SB 218 Map Fairbanks North Star Borough Service Areas 3.3.2020.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/17/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 218 |
| SB 218 Letter of Support Mayor Ward 3.3.2020.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/17/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 218 |
| SB 218 Draft Fiscal Note DCCED-DCRA- 03-06-20.pdf |
SCRA 3/10/2020 3:30:00 PM SCRA 3/17/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 218 |