Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
03/07/2022 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB118 | |
| SB187 | |
| SB189 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 187 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 189 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 187-HARASSMENT; SEX OFFENDERS & OFFENSES
1:52:24 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 187 "An Act relating to
criminal law and procedure; relating to the crime of harassment;
relating to the duty to register as a sex offender; amending the
definition of 'sex offense'; relating to lifetime revocation of
a teaching certificate for certain offenses; relating to the
definition of 'domestic violence'; relating to multidisciplinary
child protection teams; relating to arrest authority for
pretrial services officers and probation officers; and providing
for an effective date."
[SB 187 was previously heard on 2/23/22, 2/25/22, and 3/4/2022.]
CHAIR HOLLAND solicited questions from members.
1:52:54 PM
SENATOR KIEHL said several provisions were unclear. He referred
to Section 16 on page 12, lines 25-31. This section makes
adjustments to House Bill 49 that the legislature considered
several years ago, related to requirements for sex offender
registry. He recalled that the Alaska Supreme Court raised some
constitutional issues at the time. The legislature debated
requiring sex offenders to register in Alaska even if their
offense was not registerable in Alaska. He asked if there were
any constitutional issues related to the Sex Offender Registry.
1:54:57 PM
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney
General, Criminal Division, Department of Law, Anchorage,
Alaska, related the constitutional issue was ex post facto,
which means adding an enhanced or added penalty that is passed
after someone has committed a crime. The Alaska Supreme Court
ruled that sex offender registration could, in part, be deemed
as punitive. However, ex post facto does not apply because
[federal law] requires sex offenders to register in the state
where they committed the crime. When the sex offender moves to
Alaska, the statutes clarify that the same registration
requirements carry over. Thus, Alaska is not adding to their
punishment. It would only be an ex post facto violation if the
person were not required to register when convicted, and Alaska
was trying to add to that requirement.
MR. SKIDMORE envisioned someone might challenge this
requirement, but the department believes that Section 16 will
not present any constitutional issues.
1:56:53 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked if the person would be required to remain on
the sex offender registry in the state where the conviction
occurred after they moved to Alaska.
MR. SKIDMORE said he was unsure whether the person would need to
register since they would no longer be a resident of that state.
He reiterated that the punitive aspect requiring registration on
the Alaska Sex Offender Registry arises at the time of their
conviction. He was unsure whether all states' courts would
follow the Alaska Supreme Court's finding that registration is
punitive. The distinction is that the registration requirement
already existed before the person moved to Alaska.
1:57:50 PM
SENATOR KIEHL stated he was not concerned about other states'
court rulings. However, he was worried that someone would need
to register for a sex offense that was not considered a sex
offense in Alaska. He noted that if the person had done the deed
in Alaska, they would not have to register. He related that the
person would face a partially punitive element in Alaska by
needing to register after the fact. He stated that concerns him
from an ex post facto perspective.
1:58:42 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked Mr. Skidmore to weigh in on Senator Kiehl's
concern. She was unsure whether he was speaking about the timing
of the requirement or if states have different requirements for
sex offenders.
MR. SKIDMORE responded that Alaska law says that if a person is
required to register in another state as a sex offender, the
person will need to register in Alaska as a sex offender. He
elaborated that this would apply, even if the crime that
required the person to register in their state was not a crime
requiring registering as a sex offender in Alaska. The rationale
for Alaska's registration requirement was to avoid encouraging
individuals to move to Alaska from any state to avoid
registering as a sex offender.
SENATOR HUGHES replied that she understood the issue. She agreed
that some risk for court challenges exists but that the punitive
aspect disappears if someone moves to Alaska to avoid
registration. She surmised that sex offenders could be enticed
to live in Alaska. She expressed concern that Alaska could be a
magnet for those wanting to avoid a sex registry in other
states.
2:01:12 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND held SB 187 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 118 Committee Substitute version B.pdf |
SJUD 3/7/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 118 |
| SB 118 Summary of Changes (SJUD).pdf |
SJUD 3/7/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 118 |