Legislature(2025 - 2026)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/12/2025 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB20 | |
| SB11 | |
| SB184 | |
| SB6 | |
| SB146 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 146 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 37 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE BILL NO. 184
"An Act relating to school bond debt reimbursement;
and providing for an effective date."
10:13:36 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman relayed that the committee first heard the
bill on May 6 and had taken public testimony and reviewed
fiscal notes at the time. There had been one amendment
received.
10:14:03 AM
LIZ HARPOLD, STAFF, SENATOR DONNY OLSON, explained that SB
184 proposed to extend the moratorium on school bond debt
reimbursement for an additional two years. The initial
moratorium went into effect ten years previously.
10:14:38 AM
Senator Kiehl MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1.
Co-Chair Hoffman OBJECTED for discussion.
Senator Kiehl spoke to Amendment 1. He relayed that the
amendment was related to a draft regulation that DEED had
circulated to school business officials. The way the
regulation was drawn up prevented schools that were funding
at or near the cap from funding things that were not
subject to the cap (non-instructional expenditures). He
used the example of The Unalaska City School District, and
the subject of $400,000 in school nutrition funds. He
listed $400,000 of lunch money in Valdez and $13 million in
Anchorage for pupil transportation as further concerns and
indicated there were many more examples in the state. He
cited that in rough terms, if the regulation passed, the
first $25 million to $30 million provided to school
districts with the legislature would go away via the
department over the summer. The amendment would maintain
the rules currently in place.
Senator Kiehl drew attention to Section 7, which related to
the school districts' operating fund that was currently in
regulation and put it into statute. The amendment would
prevent the department from being about to re-write how
education funding was done since 1998 when the funding
formula went into effect. He knew there had been concern
voiced by the department that there may be issues regarding
the federal disparity test. He explained that the education
funding provided by the legislature for the current year
allowed for headroom under the disparity test that the
state had not had in the past.
Senator Kiehl remarked that the federal Department of
Education had not indicated that there was a problem that
needed to be solved by a new regulation. He thought the
regulation was set to be taken up in the summer when the
legislature was not in session. He thought the amendment
constituted "self-defensefrom a new regulation that would
make giant changes in school funding and finance and took
money away from non-instructional expenses.
10:17:39 AM
Senator Kiehl continued that he had conversations with a
couple of members that had questions which he needed to
answer. He understood that the committee needed to move the
bill, and he had wanted to introduce the issue for
discussion.
Senator Kiehl moved to WITHDRAW Amendment 1. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Stedman thought the issue of Amendment 1 should be
addressed and suggested querying the Senate Education
Committee for consideration of the issue. He thought the
issue should be pondered by the committee. He agreed with
the amendment sponsor that the topic was a significant
issue. He understood that the regulation would not take
effect until 2027, but thought the committee should not
lose sight of the issue.
Senator Kaufman pointed out that the underlying bill was
about maintenance and capital projects rather than about
program funding. He thought the committee should keep a
clean bill. He thought the issue raised by Senator Kiehl
deserved thorough vetting in a policy committee.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to report SB 184 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SB 184 was REPORTED out of committee with six "do pass"
recommendations and with one "amend" recommendation, and
with one new fiscal impact note from the Department of
Education and Early Development for Debt Service.
10:19:53 AM
AT EASE
10:22:57 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 20 CPR Curriculum Sectional Analysis Version N._.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 20 CPR Curriculum Sponsor Statement Version N._.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 20 Hands-Only CPR Research Links.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 20 NEA-Alaska letter from Tom Klaameyer in support of SB 20 2.19.2025 (1).pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 20 Supporting Documents.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 20 Written Letter of Support From Brian Webb.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |
| SB 11 Backup - 2022 DCCED NFIP Report published 12.22.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Sectional Analysis ver A 4.9.25.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Sponsor Statement ver A 4.9.25.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 DCCED DCRA 050925.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 AML Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 20 Coons Testimony.msg |
SFIN 5/12/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 20 |