Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/24/2001 01:55 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 176-DISTRIBUTORSHIPS
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced SB 176 to be up for consideration.
MR. JOHN HAXBY, Waukeshaw Alaska Corporation of Anchorage, said he
would answer questions.
MR. ED SNIFFEN, Department of Law, said they don't have any
concerns with this bill, but he has two recommendations. One deals
with the definition of the required payment by a distributor to a
dealer of merchandise that's held as inventory. On page 2, line 6,
language currently requires the distributor to pay the dealer 100
percent of the net cost of any merchandise that he might have in
his inventory at the time of a termination of a dealership.
Inventory depreciates over time and it may or may not be worth what
the dealer pays, but he suggested changing it to something more
like on page 3, lines 11 and 12, which states that the distributor
is required to pay a commercially reasonable business value for
that inventory.
Also, under the exemption section on page 5, line 5, the
distributorship agreement for the sale, repair or servicing of
motor vehicles that are required to get registered are excluded
from the bill and MR. SNIFFEN said he would add some language to
that definition that would include "franchise agreement" to make it
clear that automobile franchise agreements between manufacturers
and dealers are also excluded.
He said other than those recommendations, Mr. Sniffen said he
supports the bill.
MR. HAXBY responded to the issue of depreciating merchandise, that
in many cases while it may depreciate for tax purposes, many times
the inventory valuation increases as the sectors increase prices.
So, he thought it would be better to leave the language as it is.
MS. DEBORAH LUPER, Eagle River, said she would answer questions.
MR. SNIFFEN clarified that these really aren't technical problems;
they're more suggestions and they don't have strong feelings one
way or another about any of those things.
SENATOR TORGERSON noted page 2, line 6, where it says 100 percent
of net merchandise except for repair parts, and said the first
thing that came to his mind is what happens if you're a
merchandiser of repair parts.
MR. HAXBY said he understood what he was saying and that he was
correct.
SENATOR TORGERSON moved on page 2, line 6, to delete ", except
repair parts,". There were no objections and it was so ordered.
MR. HAXBY concurred with the motion.
SENATOR LEMAN asked if that amendment would affect language on
lines 2 that said: "85 percent of the current net price for repair
parts."
MR. HAXBY answered, "It should not affect it as line 2 is to
include superceded parts."
SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSSB 176 (L&C) from committee with the
accompanying fiscal note and individual recommendations. There were
no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|