Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/27/2001 01:45 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 175-MUNICIPAL PROTESTS OF GAMING PERMITS
SENATOR ELTON, bill sponsor and Senator from district B, said the
bill addressed a problem that has arisen in his community. SB 175
gives municipalities the opportunity to protest or recommend
conditions on the issuance or renewal of a gaming permit similar to
the way municipalities now protest or ask for conditions on
alcoholic beverage control (ABC) licenses.
Under the bill provisions, a municipality or applicant may, after a
hearing, make a defense and then protest the permit or ask for
conditions. One provision would, under certain circumstances,
preclude municipalities from doing that. For example, if the
municipality holds gaming permits, they could hold a hearing and
protest a permit for non-payment of taxes. The Department of
Revenue would then review the protest by the municipality and if
they determine that it is a reasonable protest they could deny the
issuance of a permit. They too would have to hold a hearing and go
through a process before they could deny the permit thus giving the
applicant another chance to present their case.
Without the bill, municipalities may only have a local option
election that would allow them to ban all gaming or just pull-tabs
or, by ordinance, they may prohibit a vendor or operator from
managing a permit. The permit would then go to another vendor or
operator.
The situation is Juneau was that three operators did not pay taxes
and over a three year period, their tax liability grew to $627,000
plus $300,000 in attorney and other costs. There was no way for the
municipality to protest the issuance of the permits even though
they are issued on a yearly basis. Since the operators have no
assets to attach, there is no way of recovering the liability. In
doing nothing to the operators who are flaunting the law, the
municipality is giving them a competitive advantage over the
operators who are paying the taxes.
This sets in place a system to give municipalities control over the
operations of the permits. Other situations in which a community
might want to have a hearing before protesting a license are fire
safety or public nuisance issues.
Side B
This solution is reserved for organized municipalities.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON commented that public nuisance is in the eye of
the beholder and he does not like the idea of a municipality having
to define nuisance and then place conditions on the activity. He
looks upon the tax as a good policy but the nuisance bothers him.
He recommended tightening the definition a bit.
SENATOR ELTON responded arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable are
definitions lifted from the ABC statutes and there is precedent
behind those issues so new definitions should not be necessary.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked whether anyone from the Department of
Revenue was present.
SENATOR ELTON said the Deputy Commissioner showed up for the
previous hearing that was canceled and his arrival was anticipated.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON said he could not get there in time. He asked
for the next committee of referral.
SENATORS LINCOLN AND PHILLIPS said it was Labor and Commerce.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON said he had some problems with the bill but he
would entertain a motion to move the bill. He wants to continue to
work with Senator Elton to narrow the focus to taxes. He wasn't
sure about fire hazard. He thought perhaps they could come up with
an amendment to offer.
SENATOR ELTON asked to be advised of which staff member to work
with and he would get any information that was needed.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON indicated his Community and Regional Affairs
staff person, Mary Jackson.
SENATOR LINCOLN moved SB 175 from committee with individual
recommendations and accompanying fiscal note. There were no
objections.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|