Legislature(2015 - 2016)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/02/2016 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB174 | |
| SB180 | |
| SB174 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 112 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 180 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 174-REG. OF FIREARMS/KNIVES BY UNIV. OF AK
1:35:53 PM
VICE CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of SB 174. He
listed those who were available for questions and opened public
testimony.
1:36:48 PM
GREG STODDARD, representing himself, testified in support of SB
174. He noted he works for the university, but is speaking for
himself. He opined that the university's current firearms policy
is more of an invitation to a perpetrator, than a deterrent. He
said statistics show gun-free zones are where violence occurs.
He said the bill requires the university to follow existing law.
Americans have the constitutional right to defend themselves. He
did not think there was anything to fear from a polite society
that arms itself.
1:39:29 PM
ROB CLIFT, Chair, Libertarian Party, testified in support of SB
174. He said the Libertarian Party supports the right to carry
"concealed" on campus and is cognizant that people already are
carrying "concealed" on campus. He said he understands that the
university is used by many people and belongs to all people of
Alaska, not to the Board of Regents. He concluded that passage
of the bill aligns the university with state law.
1:42:23 PM
LILY COHEN, representing herself, testified in opposition to SB
174. She said even though she works on campus, she is speaking
for herself. She said she carries a gun in situations where she
want to feel safe, such as out in the field, but not on campus.
She stated that she does not support guns on campus and feels
that they will not make the campus safer. She did not think that
the committee received letters opposing the bill. She read from
an article in the Onion about mass shootings around the U.S.
VICE CHAIR COGHILL noted the committee has received an equal
number of letters against the bill.
1:44:58 PM
BRIAN JUDY, Alaska Liaison, National Rifle Association,
testified in support of SB 174. He questioned whether a person
should have less freedom or safety on a college campus and why a
person who can be armed off campus, can't be armed on campus. He
stated that self-defense is a fundamental right. The bill is
about providing protection for law-abiding citizens both on and
off campus. He maintained that law enforcement cannot not
respond to shootings quick enough. He said gun-free school zones
have been a disaster with every mass killing recently having
been in such zones. He said there are currently 9 states that
allow concealed carry on campus without any problems. He shared
the history of concealed carry law. He did not believe the bill
would cause fiscal problems for the university.
1:49:21 PM
MIKE COONS, representing himself, testified in support of SB
174. He cited times when there was a deadly threat and he
produced a weapon to stop it. He debated the university
counsel's opinion that it is not a state entity. He suggested
cutting funds to the university. He said an adult in Alaska does
not need a concealed carry permit and he maintained that
training does not make a person safer. He concluded that
children are safe around concealed carry on campus.
1:53:38 PM
SETH WEAVER, representing himself, testified in opposition to SB
174. He voiced concern about the underlying aura of fear that
would infringe on one's ability to express free speech in the
classroom. He spoke as a student of the university system who
would be affected by this bill and the general reluctance for
students to speak on a hot topic when students in their classes
have guns. He referred to the Sumter Incidence where a person
was caned to death for speaking up. He suggested adding an
amendment to also allow concealed carry inside the state
capitol.
1:57:39 PM
BRIAN SIMPSON, representing himself, testified in favor of SB
174. He said it is a constitutional right to carry concealed. He
said safe zones are not safe. He concluded that those who would
carry concealed are law abiding citizens.
VICE CHAIR COGHILL noted the university is preparing additional
statements regarding K-12 students on campus.
2:01:20 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE asked about the UA fiscal note for $1.3 million
for FY2017 and $800,000, per year, for FY2018 through FY2020,
regarding K-12 programs. He asked if the university plans to
issue another fiscal note after the acceptance of version N,
which allows restricted areas.
2:03:37 PM
MICHAEL HOSTIN, General Counsel, University of Alaska System,
answered questions related to SB 174. He explained that the K-12
programs are mixed in with other programs on campus that would
not be subject to concerns that would normally be associated
with K-12 buildings where firearms are not permitted. The
university believes that there would have to be secure points,
as allowed in the bill, during K-12 events.
MATT COOPER, General Counsel, answered questions related to SB
174. He said that in addition to K-12, the fiscal note
represents funding to evaluate existing secure areas to see if
they qualify as secure access points and possibly having to make
them more secure. He gave as examples the super computer and
sensitive labs at UAF. He noted they are still working on
refining the fiscal note. The fiscal note accompanying version N
is a substantial reduction from the previous fiscal note, which
included lock boxes for secure storage.
VICE CHAIR COGHILL set SB 174 aside, awaiting further public
testimony.
SB 174-REG. OF FIREARMS/KNIVES BY UNIV. OF AK
2:44:42 PM
VICE CHAIR COGHILL returned to public testimony for SB 174.
2:44:58 PM
CARL KANCIR, representing himself, testified in support of SB
174. He said an armed society is a safe society. He said the
college police said they could arrive at a crime scene in two
minutes, however, he shared his experience in the service and
opined that campus police cannot get there in time. He gave an
example of robbers in a bar. He gave an analogy of a hockey
game. He maintained that concealed carry is good for defense. He
shared a number of stories.
VICE CHAIR COGHILL thanked the testifier and held SB 174 in
committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 174 FiscalNote.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 174 |
| SB 180 Legal Memo 2-26-16 judiciary questions.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 180 |
| SB 180 CS Draft version H.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 180 |
| SB 180 Back Up Safe Families One-Pager.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 180 |
| SB 174 Support Emails.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 174 |
| SB 174 Opposition Emails.pdf |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 174 |
| SB 174 Opposition Andree.msg |
SJUD 3/2/2016 1:30:00 PM |
SB 174 |