Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/24/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB108 | |
| SB171 | |
| SJR21 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SJR 21 | ||
SB 171-MULTIDISCIPLINARY CHILD PROTECTION TEAMS
1:49:28 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of SB 171."An Act
relating to multidisciplinary child protection teams; and
relating to investigation of child abuse or neglect." He noted
that there was a work draft committee substitute (CS) and Ms.
Moss would speak to it.
1:49:50 PM
RYNNIEVA MAAS, Staff, Senator John Coghill, introduced SB 171 on
behalf of the sponsor. She spoke to the following sponsor
statement:
The Child Justice Act Task Force requested this
legislation to clarify there are child abuse cases
that may not involve the Office of Children's Services
(OCS) and the law is gray on whether or not a
multidisciplinary investigative team can function
under state statute without the involvement of OCS.
An example of such an investigation would be a case in
which one parent sexually abused a child and the other
parent discovers the situation, reports the sexual
abuse, removes the child from physical contact of the
other parent, and the offending parent is arrested.
[Multi-disciplinary teams] MDT's do conduct such
investigations currently but there is some
disagreement about whether or not this is occurring
within the boundaries of the law. SB 171 takes
uncertainty away.
MS. MOSS reviewed the bill sections:
Section 1. Current interpretation of this statute
is the Office of Children's Services must establish a
MDT, even though in many cases OCS is not involved
with a child abuse case that involves sexual abuse.
This section expands the ability to recruit a MDT to
assist law enforcement in criminal investigations that
involve an alleged crime against a child.
Sec. 2. This section was modified to clarify who is
usually part of the MDT team and lists who can be
invited to be on the MDT permanently or as needed for
the particular matter in an investigation.
We have added a representative of an Indian tribe if
applicable; not just someone familiar with ICWA as was
the old language and have included in the list of
invitees a representative from Division of Juvenile
Justice.
Sec. 3. This section was modified to clarify other
members of the MDT can refer cases to the MDT, not
just OCS. It also updates the statute to provide that
confidential records in a CINA case shall be provided
to members of the MDT.
Sec. 4. Mandates monthly meetings.
Sec. 5. Cleanup language to clarify the goal is to
avoid duplicative interviews.
Sec. 6. Clarifies investigations and interviews can
be conducted by investigative agencies other than OCS.
CHAIR COGHILL highlighted that the legislature helped establish
child advocacy centers where these multi-disciplinary teams
work. The purpose of the bill is to ensure that a child is not
re-traumatized, and these teams are the best way to achieve that
goal.
MS. MOSS reported that these multi-disciplinary teams were
established by statute in 1998 in House Bill 375. Then private
citizen John Coghill waited for two days to testify on that
piece of legislation and "it put the fire in his belly to run
for office," she said.
CHAIR COGHILL agreed that was the genesis of his political
career.
1:55:17 PM
JAN RUTHERDALE, Chair, Children's Justice Act Task Force,
pointed out that there are two functions of the MDTs: 1)
investigatory and 2) review of ongoing OCS cases. The bill
clarifies that in those cases where OCS is not involved the
protections of the statute still apply when law enforcement does
an investigation. In the second function, OCS may find it needs
the assistance of a multi-disciplinary team after it has filed a
petition that is working its way through court so they refer the
case to a MDT. In another circumstance, there may be people on
the MDT that are concerned about how a case is progressing and
they may refer the case to the MDT.
CHAIR COGHILL commented that MDTs are able to break through the
silos in the various departments that all have authority to deal
with the child.
SENATOR DYSON said he worked very hard to introduce child
advocacy centers and their genius is that they greatly reduce
the impact on a child. They've resulted in better cases going
forward.
1:59:02 PM
SENATOR DYSON moved to adopt work draft CS for SB 171, labeled
28-LS1416\U, as the working document.
CHAIR COGHILL found no objection and announced that Version U
was adopted.
He announced that he would hold SB 171 in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB108-DOA-PDA-02-20-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-DOA-OPA-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-ACS-TRC-01-31-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-LAW-CRIM-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Rule 37.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Collateral Consequences in Alaska.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Section Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB171-LAW-CIV-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB171-DHSS-CSM-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB171-DOA-OPA-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Version U Marked Up.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| 7 AAC 54.020 Protected Info.docx |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Sectional.docx |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| MDTs By 2010.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |