Legislature(2017 - 2018)BUTROVICH 205
03/01/2018 01:30 PM Senate TRANSPORTATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB163 | |
| HB204 | |
| HB82 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 163 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 204 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 82 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 163-DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES
1:31:59 PM
CHAIR STEDMAN announced the consideration of SB 163.
1:32:33 PM
JOHN BINDER, Deputy Commissioner, Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage, Alaska,
provided an introduction of SB 163 as follows:
SB 163 proposes to bring Alaska's definitions of
"commercial motor vehicle" into the 21st century.
Senate Bill 163 proposed changes will benefit farmers
who transport agricultural commodities or supplies in
Alaska because existing restrictions on farm vehicles
limit their movement to within 150 miles of the farm.
SB 163 will allow farmers to operate anywhere in
Alaska. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP-21), made the federal regulation of
farmers less restrictive than our current existing
language in Alaska statute. SB 163 also proposes the
transportation of hazardous materials should be
amended to only apply to quantities of substances that
require a placard regardless of the size of the
vehicle. Finally, the definition of "school bus" is
updated to provide clarity for when school buses are
exempt from commercial motor vehicle requirements.
1:32:38 PM
SENATOR EGAN joined the committee meeting.
1:33:56 PM
DAN SMITH, Director, Division of Measurement Standards and
Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities, Juneau, Alaska, provided a
sectional overview of SB 163 as follows:
Section 1
AS 19.10.300, the area that we intended to change was
in AS 19.10.399 which is "definitions." AS 19.10.300
is financial responsibility, but since we are using
this wording later on in the bill, this was to mirror
those changes that you will be seeing later.
Page 2, line 4
When we start talking about "covered farm vehicles" is
really the meat of this bill. Presently, a farmer
using a farm vehicle away from their farm after 150
miles from that farm they are then treated as though
they are a motor carrier, meaning they would have to
meet all of the requirements of a carrier, having like
a DOST number markings on their vehicle, that sort of
thing; this change would allow them to operate
anywhere in the state.
Page 2, line 29
When we get to "placard," there are times when a
commercial vehicle may be hauling a substance that is
deemed a hazardous material but it's not in a quantity
that requires a placard. If I owned an air taxi, for
instance, I went and picked up a 55-gallon drum,
that's not an amount of gas that would require a
placard, so sometimes that situation arises, and we
just wanted to be really clear when somebody is
operating a vehicle as a commercial vehicle that then
would be requiring a placard.
"School buses" and "school bus operations"
Presently, in AS 19.10.399 it says, "School buses are
not commercial vehicles," so we wanted to make this
change to clarify that school buses when they are used
for transporting school children from home to school
or school to home, that is school bus operations and
they are exempt from the requirements. So, right now
it is too broad, and it is not a compatible
definition, we say "all school buses." If a school bus
in the summer is picking up down here and taking
passengers from a cruise ship out to the glacier,
that's a motor carrier of passengers at that time and
they would be regulated as such, they already know
that because that's how we've regulating them because
most of them are in interstate commerce already and
therefore are falling under a more restrictive rule.
1:36:41 PM
SENATOR MACKINNON asked what the current commercial requirements
are for school bus drivers or for school buses.
MR. SMITH replied as follows:
For those exempt operations I can't answer that
question because DOT&PF doesn't regulate them, I
believe that's Early Education that sets those
requirements for school buses when they are operating
as a "school bus;" once they are outside of that
definition, absolutely, I can tell you the
requirements for a motor carrier of passengers.
SENATOR MACKINNON explained that her intent was to find out if
there were any unintended consequences from the change in
definition that will affect schools and the safety of the
children that are being transported.
1:37:38 PM
SENATOR WILSON joined the committee meeting.
MR. SMITH replied that he did know of any unintended
consequences. He explained that for the most part, a lot of the
school bus transport is being conducted by government agencies
who are already exempt. He said for those carriers that do
school bus operations and then would have operations as a
commercial carrier, they abide by stringent driver
qualifications and vehicle requirements.
SENATOR BISHOP asked if the exemption for farmers to operate
anywhere in the state without a CDL [commercial drivers
license] was federal law.
MR. SMITH replied that is correct; it is the 49 CFR. [United
State Code of Federal Regulation (CFR)]
SENATOR BISHOP disclosed that he had considered adding minors to
the exemption, but a federal exemption was required. He asked if
the bill gets around that requirement because 49 CFR allows the
exemption for agriculture.
MR. SMITH answered yes.
1:39:17 PM
SENATOR MACKINNON addressed her concerns regarding farm vehicle
safety as follows:
My only question is regarding safety and whether the
roads will be safe with these types of vehicles on
them without the same certification as a "commercial."
I understand the economic disadvantage for the
farmers, agriculture is a tough business to be in and
moving your goods to market is difficult, but the
vehicles and the safety of those vehicles is still of
concern to all of us. Can you speak to the safety of
farm vehicles on a road? I understand it is allowed on
a national level, but Alaska faces some severe winter
conditions and others that require us to look at
everything in a unique way.
MR. SMITH replied that there will be no measurable effect on
safety.
SENATOR BISHOP asked him to address safety regarding 18-wheel
farm vehicles and inquired if the vehicle is exempt from DOT
inspection.
MR. SMITH answered that a farm vehicle would meet the exception
for a covered farm vehicle or existing farm vehicle exception.
He added that an exemption would also apply to [49 CFR Part 391]
for the medical and [49 CFR Part 383] for driver qualifications.
SENATOR BISHOP addressed air brakes and inquired if the
tolerances are the same for farmers as they are for commercial
carriers.
MR. SMITH answered yes.
1:41:38 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN opened public testimony.
1:41:59 PM
AVES THOMPSON, Executive Director, Alaska Trucking Association,
Anchorage, Alaska, testified in support of SB 163. He specified
that any effort to clarify the statutes makes it easier for the
trucking industry to comply. He said SB 163 reduces the burden
on farmers and farm vehicles by removing the 150-mile
restriction on farms transporting their own "covered farm
vehicles" in the conduct of their business and allows them to
operate statewide. He noted that if a choice is made to enter
the "for hire world," compliance with the commercial vehicle
rules and regulations will be required. He added that SB 163
provides certainty for motor carriers of passengers by clearly
identifying school bus operations. He specified that school
buses are not considered commercial motor vehicles while
conducting "school bus operations." He added that school bus
operators that choose to engage in "for hire" transport other
than school bus operations would also have to comply with
commercial vehicle rules and regulations. He detailed that SB
163 also provides clarification for carriers transporting
hazardous materials in amounts that require a placard.
1:44:07 PM
CHAIR STEDMAN closed public testimony.
1:44:22 PM
CHAIR STEDMAN held SB 163 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 204 Version J 4.19.17.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Senate Transportation Committee Memo.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Minor Offences Table.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 DOT Work Zone Safety Week PR.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 CS (JUD) Sponsor Statement.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Citation Statistics.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 AAA Support Letter.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 NWZAW Poster.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 - FN DPS.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 - FN DOA.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 82 ver J.A 2.26.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 Supporting Documents - Powerpoint 4.11.2017.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 Summary of Changes.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 Sponsor Statement 4.11.2017.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 Letters of Support 2.15.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| HB 82 - FN DOA.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 82 |
| SB163 Fiscal Note DOT-MSCVE 1.29.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 Hearing Request 1.29.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 ver A 1.29.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 Sponsor Statement 1.29.18.pdf |
STRA 3/1/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 163 |