Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
04/03/2018 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals | |
| HB407 | |
| SCR17 | |
| SB163 | |
| Approval of Introduction of Potential Committee Legislation | |
| HB83 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 407 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SCR 17 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 163 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 163-DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES
4:52:41 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 163(STA), "An Act relating to
commercial motor vehicles."
4:52:51 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
4:53:02 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS asked if Mr. Byrd could present the bill.
4:53:45 PM
DANIEL BYRD, Chief, Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, Anchorage
Office, Division of Measurement Standards & Commercial Vehicle
Enforcement, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
(DOT&PF) introduced himself and stated he would try to do so.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS expressed concern about the audio quality
for the testifier.
4:54:04 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
4:54:59 PM
JOHN BINDER, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF)
introduced himself. He stated that SB 163 would bring Alaska's
definition of commercial motor vehicles into the 21st century
and in alignment with the Federal Highways Reauthorization Act
of 2012, "Moving Ahead for Progress in the Twenty-First Century
Act," commonly referred to as MAP-21.
4:55:26 PM
MR. BINDER stated that the proposed changes in SB 163 would
benefit farmers who transport agricultural commodities or
supplies in Alaska because existing restrictions on farm
vehicles limit their movement to within 150 miles of their farm.
This bill would allow farmers to operate anywhere in Alaska. He
stated that MAP-21 made the federal regulations less restrictive
than current Alaska statutes. This bill, SB 163, would also
propose that transportation of hazardous materials be amended to
only apply to (indis.) regardless of the size of the vehicle.
Finally, the definition of school bus would be updated to
provide clarity for when school buses are exempt from commercial
motor vehicle regulation requirements.
4:56:18 PM
MR. BINDER offered to provide additional information on the
specific sections. Section 1 primarily would relate to the 150-
mile rule. This would allow farmers operating their vehicles in
support of their farm operations to transport materials anywhere
in the state without being limited to the 150-mile radius of
their farm.
MR. BINDER stated that Section 2 would primarily relate to the
HAZMAT [hazardous materials] portion. Current statute required
that certain placards be posted regardless of the amount;
however, federal regulation relieved that up to certain
quantities, so this would align with federal regulations, he
said. For example, an aircraft operator might wish to deliver a
drum to a village or a remote residence. Under current law, the
operator would need to placard that even though reporting this
amount of substance would not normally be required.
4:57:25 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS passed the gavel to Vice Chair LeDoux.
4:57:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked whether 110 gallons of aviation gas
would exceed the federal placard amount.
MR. BINDER said that was correct.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked whether commercial fishermen who use
their pickup to carry three drums of fuel, which would equate to
150 gallons, would be affected by the bill given the definition
of commercial vehicle in SB 163, would need to comply with
weights and measures.
MR. BINDER responded that this bill would relieve the burden
because federal regulations are less than state statute and it
would allow drivers to transport those quantities without being
stopped for commercial purposes.
5:00:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP referred to [page 2, line 24] in Section 2,
"for vehicles used in interstate commerce," and whether that
would affect fishing guides hauling their boats containing
drums, such that the guides would be subject to commercial
vehicle inspections. He asked whether this bill would have any
unintended consequences for these fishing guides.
MR. BYRD answered that this bill does not affect compliance
requirements for intrastate versus interstate commerce. He
explained that currently the federal government has jurisdiction
over HAZMAT [hazardous materials] shipments and if the
regulations require placards then the regulations would apply.
This bill would not change commercial vehicle enforcement or
HAZMAT enforcement.
5:01:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP referred to the definition of school bus
under [proposed AS 19.10.399 (15)]. He asked whether that fell
under the exemption and further how this provision would affect
school buses that have been converted to recreational vehicles
and whether these vehicles would be considered commercial
vehicles.
MR. BYRD answered that school buses or any commercial vehicle
must fit the definition of a commercial vehicle, including gross
vehicle weight, the number of passengers, and whether the
vehicle would be transporting hazardous materials. The
underlying requirement would be that the vehicle must be used in
commerce, so school buses used as recreational vehicles would
not fall under the definition of commercial vehicle.
5:02:53 PM
VICE CHAIR LEDOUX returned the gavel to Chair Kreiss-Tomkins.
5:03:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to Section 1, on page 2, lines 4-
which removed a description of the vehicle but added "covered"
farm vehicles. He asked for further clarification on the
meaning of covered farm vehicles and if it meant covered by a
tarp or covered by law.
MR. BYRD answered that it meant vehicles covered by the
regulation.
5:03:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to the statutory cite for farm
vehicles that were covered by this provision. He read, that
are controlled and operated by a farmer; used to transport
agricultural products, farm machinery, or farm supplies to or
from that farmer's farm... He wondered if a flat-bed truck
would fall under proposed Section 2 since these vehicles can
travel anywhere in the state. He asked for further
clarification on how to identify the vehicle as "farm vehicles"
from those that are not.
MR. BYRD answered that if the vehicle does not have an
interstate commerce [ICC] number registration on the vehicle,
which typically indicates commerce. He acknowledged that
sometimes the same vehicles are used for farm operations and at
times for commercial operations. The intent by removing the
specificity was to allow farmers to use a variety of vehicles or
implements to conduct their farm business without being overly
restrictive with the type of vehicle.
5:05:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK expressed concern about vehicles being
operated by "other than the farmer." He offered to review what
would be included for "covered farm vehicles."
5:05:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked for the rationale used for
distinguishing between commercial vehicles and other vehicles.
She was unsure of the reason to exempt farm vehicles from the
definition of commercial vehicles.
MR. BINDER deferred to Mr. Byrd.
MR. BYRD offered that the rationale used to exempt "covered farm
vehicles" would be to provide relief from regulations through
MAP-21. [The exemption] currently applies to all interstate
vehicles and this bill would add the exemption for intrastate
vehicle traffic. He was unsure of the reason for the exemption
for farmers and farm vehicles, noting he could only speculate,
so he deferred to the Department of Law or someone else to
respond.
5:07:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked Mr. Binder for the rationale for
distinguishing between a commercial vehicle and a non-commercial
vehicle and whether it referred to a vehicle size, danger, or
other criteria. She asked for further clarification on why farm
vehicles would be exempt, which could be used to transport bomb
materials.
5:08:37 PM
MR. BINDER answered that commercial vehicles were larger and
carried cargo, so it would require that drivers have extra
training. In addition, commercial vehicle regulations also
cover vehicle safety, to ensure vehicles are safe, especially if
the drivers are transporting passengers or HAZMAT [hazardous
materials]. He was unsure of the reason to exempt farm
vehicles.
5:09:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX said she would like to hear the rationale
for exempting farm vehicles.
MR. BINDER responded that farm vehicles currently are exempted
and have been for years. This bill would remove the 150-mile
radius restriction, which was especially important in Alaska
since farmers often need to transport their products for
distances that exceed 150 miles.
5:09:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON offered her anecdotal response would be
that farm vehicles are used on farms and their primary use is
for off-highway purposes. Farmers may deliver goods or travel
short distances on a highway; however, these vehicles are often
slow-moving and are not equipped with signals.
5:10:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX related her understanding that
Representative Johnson's description would contain farm vehicles
within 150 miles of their farms, which seemed appropriate. She
expressed concern that farm vehicles would be able to drive
anywhere on the road system without being designated as
commercial vehicles.
5:11:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK agreed, noting that was his point with
respect to removing language on page 2, lines 5-10. He wondered
if it would be better to keep the language except for the 150-
mile limit. He expressed concern about removing the conditions
that limit it to a farmer transporting goods from one place to
another and opening it up to anyone. He related a scenario in
which a person could operate a produce and dairy business and
truck produce without having to obtain a commercial driver's
license (CDL). He referred to page 3, lines 6-11, which would
remove that language again. He was unsure if coverage was
somewhere in statute.
5:12:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP offered his belief, since he has commercial
trucks and while he does not like the regulations, some of the
trucks haul 100,000 pounds and should be held to stricter
standards. Thus, he understood the reason for commercial
vehicle regulations. He offered the rationale for commercial
vehicles was these vehicles are being used for commerce every
day whereas farm vehicles and transport was seasonal and
occasional. In response to Representative Tuck's concern, he
mentioned that Section 3 does start to define farm equipment,
reading [AS 19.10.399 (14) "covered farm vehicle" means]
straight or articulated vehicle..." He continued and
paraphrased subparagraph (B), which indicated that it must be
operated by the owner or operator of a farm or ranch or employee
of a farm or ranch. He argued that this language did not
include commerce and characterized it as personal use. He
recalled that a few years ago commercial vehicle enforcement
started having commercial fishing guides pulling their boats
with regular pickups subject to enforcement and requiring them
to hold a commercial driver's license (CDL) until the
legislature passed an exemption.
5:14:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON offered feedback from farmers, including
that commercial vehicles cannot obtain "farmer's license plates"
since these plates are limited to farmers. She indicated that
farm vehicles were already defined.
MR. BINDER acknowledged that he could have directed members to
Section 3. He directed attention to school buses, since some
buses have been used for commercial operation during the summer
months when school is not in session and the buses were not
being used for school operations.
5:16:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK related his understanding that school bus
drivers must have a CDL requirement if they were transporting
students. He asked whether bus drivers who were using school
buses for other types of commerce would be exempt under SB 163.
MR. BYRD answered that the commercial driver's license (CDL)
program was a federal program. He stated that if bus drivers
were hauling 16 or more passengers, they would need CDLs.
5:17:20 PM
MR. BINDER added that would be for commercial purposes. He
asked for further clarification.
MR. BYRD answered that school bus drivers were required to hold
CDLs with a passenger endorsement.
5:17:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to page 3, lines 1-2, and read,
"the following vehicles meeting the criteria in (A) and (B) and
either 2 (C)(i) or (ii) [(A) - (C)] of this paragraph are not
commercial motor vehicles:" He said the way he read this
language, school buses were commercial vehicles so it would
require school bus drivers to hold CDLs. He asked for further
clarification on what was being exempted.
MR. BINDER directed attention to page 2, line 25 to current AS
19:10.399(1)(C)(ii), which read, "is designed to transport more
than 15 passengers," noting that even though a school bus was
designed to carry more than 15 passengers it was not being
considered a commercial vehicle while it is being used to
transport students for school purposes.
5:18:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked for further clarification if school
buses were not commercial vehicles the reason for the
designation and if federal law requires drivers to hold CDLs to
drive school buses.
MR. BINDER responded that additional commercial requirements
pertain to vehicles being used in commerce would start to apply,
including vehicle maintenance, lighting and marking, depending
on the purpose being used in commerce that do not apply while
hauling students.
5:19:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK expressed concern since drivers hauling
students to and from school do not need to keep tail lights and
markings operational and up to code. It seemed to him school
bus drivers should have to meet higher standards not a lesser
standard.
5:20:00 PM
MR. BYRD answered that the commercial vehicle requirements would
be the markings, medical certificate, and the name of the
company on the side of the bus. He said that the exemptions in
the bill would exempt the drivers from safety regulations under
federal requirements. He did not believe that drivers were
exempt from CDL requirements, but they would be exempt from
additional requirements that would apply to commercial vehicles;
however, he noted that there was also a school bus inspection
program, which was more stringent, more so than commercial
vehicle inspections. Those inspections were conducted through
the Department of Education and Early Development (DEED). He
related his understanding that DEED requires school buses must
be inspected twice a year to check vehicle safety, such as brake
linings and wiring. He commented that bus drivers were still
required to do a walk around inspection to ensure that the bus
is in safe operating condition each time they leave to conduct a
route.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK acknowledged that was a policy call.
5:21:46 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that SB 163 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB407 Sponsor Statement 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB 407 Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB407 ver D 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB407 Fiscal Note 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| SCR 17 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR017A.PDF |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support CDVSA 2015 Victimization Survey.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Ltr Women.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials 2018 Theme.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials News Article 11.20.2016.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SB163 Sponsor Statement 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 ver D 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 Fiscal Note DOT-MSCVE 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| HB083 Sponsor Statement 2.28.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Sectional Analysis 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 ver N 2.20.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-COM 2.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB 2.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - 401k retirement readiness 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - Alaska Comparable Plans 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - Compare DB to DC access 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Oakley Presentation.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Letters of Support 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB 83 ver T 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Explanation of changes from ver N to ver T 4.3.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Legal Memorandum on ver T 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
|
| Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
|
| Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals Presentation 3.29.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |