Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/01/2024 01:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB161 | |
SJR13 | |
Presentation(s): Alaska Broadband Update | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | SB 161 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
*+ | SJR 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 161-TAX EXEMPTION FOR FARM USE LAND 1:31:52 PM CHAIR DUNBAR announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 161 "An Act relating to municipal taxation of farm use land; and providing for an effective date." [This is the second hearing of SB 161 in the Senate Community and Regional Affairs Committee.] 1:32:01 PM CHAIR DUNBAR opened public testimony on SB 161. 1:32:36 PM BEN ADAMS, representing self, Soldotna, Alaska, testified in support of SB 161, stating that he is a new farmer and rancher in Alaska. Property taxes on structures are one of a farmer's biggest expenses, which discourages farming. He said that, unlike every state he knows, Alaska has the idea of progressive property taxation. He explained that the more he builds and farms, the more his property taxes increase. He is now at the point where he pays considerably more than anyone else in his neighborhood, including those with more land and residential structures, all due to farming. He said that in Southcentral Alaska, it is a hugely discouraging factor. He said farmers informed him they cannot increase production because they cannot afford the property taxes on the new structures required for expansion. He said if the state is serious about food security, then Alaska needs to: - stop making minor, incremental changes, - stop with the far-flung agricultural projects, and - do something that makes a huge difference to the farmers in Kenai and Mat-Su, like offer an exemption or a deferral for structures on farms. MR. ADAMS compared various forms of taxation on farms around Alaska. He said the disparity in property taxes makes it cheaper for certain farms to produce agricultural goods. He said the state's largest farms are in Delta Junction, and they pay nothing. Fairbanks has a farm structure exemption, which 78 percent of voters approved. He said farms like his cannot produce agricultural goods cheaply due to the larger property tax bills. Before he started farming two years ago, his property taxes were about $1,000 yearly; now, they are more than $1,000 monthly. He said it is impossible to break even, let alone turn a profit or grow as a farmer and rancher when the property tax bill increases every time he builds anything. It is the opposite of what every other state does, and it needs to change if Alaskans seriously want food security in the state. He urged the legislature to fix this before farmers give up and go bankrupt. He said Alaska cannot have food security under the current law. 1:35:47 PM MARCUS MUELLER, representing self, Kenai, Alaska, testified in support of SB 161, stating he is a new farmer in Homer, Alaska. He said that he likes: - the straightforward approach of SB 161, - that it includes farm buildings, - that it includes the use of IRS tax form Schedule F (Form 1040) and - the $1000 product value threshold. 1:36:25 PM MR. MUELLER said he is starting a farm business on 177 acres of land, 2 miles off-road on the Kenai Peninsula. He works as a land manager for the Kenai Peninsula Borough during the day. He wrote a white paper on agriculture in this capacity. It outlines an agricultural initiative on the Kenai Peninsula that identifies where the borough could put forward as much as four to six thousand acres of land for agricultural production. In the process of writing the white paper, he had a lot of conversations with the farming community and those interested in locally grown foods in the region. He has been involved with the Borough Resilience and Security Advisory Commission for the past two years. This group of volunteers discusses emerging issues on the Kenai Peninsula and includes an agricultural subcommittee. A recurring topic of discussion is the use of tax policy as a tool for governments to promote agricultural growth across the state. 1:38:44 PM MR. MUELLER said that the role of tax policy is important, particularly concerning agriculture. He outlined a finding of particular importance: • The agricultural sector is a land-based industry. • Land is an important part of the supply chain, as is access to land and the affordability of land. • Agriculture competes with other sectors for land. • Land for residential use has the advantage of 30-year, capitalized upfront mortgages. • Residential-use land has a major infusion of capital, which gives this sector a lot of purchasing power. • In contrast, capital works just the opposite for agricultural- use land. • A farmer starts with very little capital, and the goal is to make the land's soil valuable over time. • A farmer might build the operation and value of the land over 30 years. • The economic structure for land used in the agricultural sector differs greatly from other sectors. • The tax policy for agricultural producers should reflect the reality of this difference. MR. MUELLER thanked the committee for the opportunity to testify and encouraged support of SB 161. 1:41:12 PM PAMELA SAMASH, representing self, Nenana, Alaska, testified in support of SB 161, aligning with previous testimony. She said it is critical to support efforts to increase food sustainability. The pandemic taught that Alaska is too dependent on the Lower 48. Farmers in Alaska are like heroes. They supply not only local food but good-quality local food. Happy, healthy farmers who humanely raise animals and organic produce means healthy Alaskans. SB 161 works for everybody. 1:43:00 PM CHAIR DUNBAR agreed that during the pandemic, Alaska faced a public crisis that caused a lot of worry. He mentioned the Port of Tacoma and that Alaska needs to improve its food security. 1:43:21 PM ADAM JENSKI, representing self, Palmer, Alaska, testified in support of SB 161 and answered questions. He foraged hay and raised bison and cattle in the Mat-Su Valley for about 20 years. He has been leaning into horse hay to pay bills because it is more profitable. He and his wife lease 3,000 to 4,000 acres of property between Palmer, Sutton, and Point MacKenzie. He said SB 161 is going in the right direction. He stated that taxes make farming leased ground more cost-effective than buying property. He asked that the committee consider allowing farmers to defer taxes completely. It is hard to find land suitable for agriculture in Alaska. He stated that SB 161 encourages landowners to keep their land for agricultural use instead of pursuing more profitable development opportunities. 1:45:46 PM SENATOR OLSON asked whether the tax structure has changed in the Mat-Su Valley over the past 20 years. MR. JENSKI replied, no. He started when he was 18 and is still filling out the same tax deferment application, albeit it only applies to the property itself, not the structures. The tax deferment helped him slow losses and hang on to 225 acres, down from 500. He said development outpaces the farmer's ability to replace land that is developed for other purposes. He foresees this trend persisting. Point MacKenzie has some big tracts, and the tax structure helps the land but not the massive barns on the land. Landowners prioritize tenants who can pay higher prices to store their RVs and airplanes to recoup their investments, rather than renting to farmers. He asserted that the current tax deferment program fails to make these structures affordable for agricultural purposes. 1:47:16 PM SENATOR OLSON asked what kind of services the borough provides in exchange for paid taxes. MR. JENSKI asked if he meant road services. SENATOR OLSON replied yes, clearing roads and services that help farmers sustain their livelihoods. MR. JENSKI replied that Point MacKenzie is fairly poor. He expressed frustration that despite paying property taxes, the community receives no fire protection. He pointed out that two homes were lost due to the absence of fire services, even though the prison in Point MacKenzie does have fire protection. 1:48:10 PM SENATOR BJORKMAN asked him to contact his office about deferment and ways to improve the program. 1:48:35 PM CHAIR DUNBAR closed public testimony on SB 161. CHAIR DUNBAR held SB 161 in committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 161 - FN DCCED; Community and Regional Affairs.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 161 |
SJR 13 Testimony Delivered 11-8-2023.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
SJR 13 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
SJR 13 Support 2023 AFN Resolution.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
SJR 13 Version A.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
AK GOV Letter re AMLT.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
SJR 13 DCCED_DCRA MLT Presentation to SCRA 2023-04-20.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
Senate Community & Regional Affairs Alaska Broadband Office Presentation 2.1.2024.pdf |
SCRA 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
Alaska Broadband Office - DCCED |