Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106

04/04/2024 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Please Note Location Change --
+= SB 161 TAX EXEMPTION FOR FARM LAND/STRUCTURES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
*+ HB 221 SUBDIVISION OF UNPLATTED LAND TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
         SB 161-TAX EXEMPTION FOR FARM LAND/STRUCTURES                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:02:15 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that the  first order of business would                                                               
be  CS FOR  SENATE  BILL NO.  161(CRA) am,  "An  Act relating  to                                                               
municipal  taxation  of  farm  land   and  farm  structures;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
8:02:40 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR JESSE BJORKMAN, Alaska  State Legislature, prime sponsor,                                                               
gave an  overview of CSSB 161(CRA)  am.  He stated  that the bill                                                               
would extend  the property tax  exemption from farm use  lands to                                                               
farm use  buildings to  allow the  buildings to  be taxed  at the                                                               
farm rate,  not the full  and true  value assessment.   Also, the                                                               
bill  would extend  optional  provisions  for municipalities  and                                                               
political subdivisions to incorporate  all farm buildings if they                                                               
so choose.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:05:07 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
LAURA  ACHEE,   Staff,  Senator  Jesse  Bjorkman,   Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature,  on behalf  of Senator  Bjorkman,  prime sponsor  of                                                               
CSSB 161(CRA) am, said she had nothing to add.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  BJORKMAN  noted  that the  current  version  before  the                                                               
committee included aquaculture.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
8:06:03 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR MCCORMICK opened public testimony on SB 161.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
8:06:33 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CAROLE  TRIEM,   Program  Coordinator,  Resilience   Economies  &                                                               
Economies, Alaska Municipal League,  testified during the hearing                                                               
on CSSB 161(CRA)  am.  She commented on  mandatory exemptions and                                                               
how they reduce  the local government's ability  to raise revenue                                                               
while doing  nothing to reduce  costs.  She added  that expanding                                                               
mandatory  exemptions   shifts  the  tax  burden   to  commercial                                                               
property  owners,  residential  homeowners,   and  renters.    In                                                               
addition, she  said that expanding the  mandatory exemption would                                                               
lower the  full value determination,  which in turn,  would lower                                                               
the amount of  funding a local government can give  to the school                                                               
district.      She   added   that   optional   exemptions   allow                                                               
municipalities to provide fit for  purpose policy that fits their                                                               
local needs,  so for that reason,  she said the AML  supports the                                                               
removal of the  requirement for the optional exemption  to be put                                                               
to  voters,  in  addition  to   the  expansion  of  the  optional                                                               
exemption.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:08:34 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
BRAD ST. PIERRE, representing self,  testified during the hearing                                                               
on CSSB 161(CRA)  am.  He said he supports  the tax exemption for                                                               
farmers.   He opined that there  are two pieces of  the bill that                                                               
need  to  be  amended,  as they  would  negatively  impact  young                                                               
farmers and  their access  to farm land.   Firstly,  he requested                                                               
that the committee amend the bill  to keep the public engaged and                                                               
keep  the  vote of  the  people  required  on all  tax  exemption                                                               
changes.   Secondly,  he opined  that the  state should  keep the                                                               
qualification for applicants  to be proof that 10  percent of the                                                               
farmer's  total income  comes from  farming.   He concluded  that                                                               
changing  it to  the ability  to produce  $1,000 in  agricultural                                                               
products and  filing a schedule F  would not support the  type of                                                               
farming that would bolster Alaska's food system.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
8:12:26 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SAVANNAH  FLETCHER,  Presiding   Officer,  Fairbanks  North  Star                                                               
Borough Assembly,  testified during the hearing  on CSSB 161(CRA)                                                               
am.  She  confirmed that last year,  Fairbanks passed Proposition                                                               
2 by  an overwhelming  majority, which  provides a  tax exemption                                                               
for farm  structures used exclusively  for farming.   Despite the                                                               
suggestion from  Legislative Legal  Services that the  bill would                                                               
not nullify  the municipal exemption, she  expressed concern that                                                               
the  language in  Section  1  would not  allow  the exemption  to                                                               
continue.   She  requested that  the bill  be amended  to provide                                                               
further clarity on this and  sustain local power and local choice                                                               
in  setting the  tax exemption.   She  explained that  the $1,000                                                               
threshold would be a huge  departure from the current standard of                                                               
10 percent  of income, which, rather  than encouraging additional                                                               
farming, may  support hobby farmers  getting a big  tax exemption                                                               
without producing  more food  for the community  to consume.   In                                                               
addition, she expressed concern about  use of the word "normally"                                                               
[on page 1,  line 10] due to the USDA's  interpretation of it and                                                               
the  potential for  broad interpretation  by assessors.   Lastly,                                                               
she  expressed   concern  about   the  ability  to   assess  farm                                                               
structures if exclusive use would no longer be a requirement.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HIMSCHOOT  asked Ms.  Fletcher  to  speak to  the                                                               
difference  between  10 percent  of  yearly  gross income  versus                                                               
$1,000 in sales.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS. FLETCHER  said presumably, [10  percent] is a  more stringent                                                               
standard.    She  suggested implementing  a  flat  number  that's                                                               
higher than $1,000.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT  asked whether the sharing  of financial                                                               
statements is  the barrier, or  whether the barrier is  the money                                                               
amount.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS  FLETCHER said  either way,  some [financial  statement] would                                                               
need to be shared.  She  reiterated her concern that $1,000 would                                                               
be too low to achieve the policy goal.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT  asked what  the threshold should  be if                                                               
not 1,000.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. FLETCHER  deferred to the Alaska  Farmers Market Association.                                                               
She estimated that $5,000 would be closer to the target.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
8:20:01 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  MCCABE  questioned  the   change  in  revenue  in                                                               
Fairbanks prior to the public vote on [Proposition 2].                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MS.  FLETCHER said  a conservative  estimate  suggests that  this                                                               
could take  at least $7  million off  the tax roll,  as currently                                                               
written, based on agricultural land  at the 10 percent threshold.                                                               
She noted  that the tax  exemption only passed [six  months] ago,                                                               
so she did not have the requested data.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  MCCABE expressed  concern  that  the term  "hobby                                                               
farms" was  being used  derisively.  He  opined that  hobby farms                                                               
are not  necessarily a bad  thing if  they are growing  their own                                                               
food.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
8:22:43 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
BONNE WOLDSTAD,  representing self, testified during  the hearing                                                               
on CSSB  161(CRA) am.   She suggested  adding "on or"  before the                                                               
wording  "before  May  15"  in the  language  pertaining  to  the                                                               
Schedule  F form  in Section  3, subsection  (f).   She said  she                                                               
found  it ironic  that last  year,  the state  of Alaska  offered                                                               
grants for the  purchase of livestock feed to  help sustain small                                                               
farms  at  the  same  time   that  individuals  were  finding  it                                                               
increasingly  difficult to  apply for  and receive  the farm  tax                                                               
exemption.  She  said SB 161 would assist in  keeping small farms                                                               
operational in Alaska.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR MCCORMICK closed public testimony on SB 161.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
8:25:01 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The committee took a brief at-ease.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
8:26:05 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR MCCORMICK sought questions from committee members.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
8:26:19 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked  the bill sponsor to  speak to the                                                               
change  from 10  percent  of  yearly gross  income  to $1,000  in                                                               
sales.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  BJORKMAN said  Representative Himschoot  was correct  in                                                               
identifying that  the source  of the standard  to access  the tax                                                               
deferment came from the Food  Strategy Taskforce.  He agreed that                                                               
farms often  start small and  then scale as they're  able produce                                                               
more food.   He opined that the $1,000 threshold  is a good place                                                               
to start because individuls filing  a schedule F would be telling                                                               
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  that they are in the business                                                               
of farming.  He spoke to the purpose of the farm use rate.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:28:58 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT  asked whether  the schedule F  form can                                                               
only be filed by farmers.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS.  ACHEE confirmed  that only  someone  in the  business of  an                                                               
agricultural  operation  would  file   a  schedule  F,  including                                                               
aquaculture and marijuana operations.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT suggested that  the filing of a schedule                                                               
F  would indicate  that some  portion of  an individual's  income                                                               
came from farming.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR BJORKMAN said, "That's correct."                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MS.  ACHEE opined  that it  isn't  practicable to  only focus  on                                                               
large  scale operations  when  it comes  to  increasing the  food                                                               
supply in Alaska.   She emphasized the importance  of making room                                                               
for smaller operations that are creating a smaller change.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:31:19 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR MCCORMICK  announced that  CSSB 161(CRA)  am would  be held                                                               
over.                                                                                                                           

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 161 Explanation of Changes Ver S to R 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Sectional Analysis Ver R 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Sponsor Statement Ver R 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Support Document Overview of Bill Actions 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Support Document Recommendation Encourage Tax Exemptions for Farmland 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Support Document Table 10A 10B Farm Use Land Assessment Program 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Support Document USDA Farm Definition 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Ver R 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
HB221 Sectional Analysis Version B 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
HB 221
HB221 Sponsor Statement 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
HB 221
HB221 Version U Proposed Committee Substitute 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
HB 221
HB0221A.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
HB 221
CSSB 161 Explanation of Changes Ver S to R to R.A 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 Sectional Analysis Ver R.A 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 Overview of Bill Actions 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 Sponsor Statement Ver R.A 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 Ver R.A 4.2.24.A HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB161 Fiscal Note DCCED-DCRA 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB161 DCCED-DCRA Response to HCRA re SB 161 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB161 DCCED-DCRA Response to HCRA re SB 161 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 (CRA) Fiscal Note 4.2.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Explanation of Changes Ver S to D 4.4.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
SB 161 Sectional Analysis Ver D 4.4.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
CSSB 161 Ver D 4.4.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
SB 161
HB221 Fiscal Note 4.4.24.pdf HCRA 4/4/2024 8:00:00 AM
HB 221