Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
04/04/2024 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB161 | |
HB221 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 161 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 221 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 161-TAX EXEMPTION FOR FARM LAND/STRUCTURES 8:02:15 AM CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that the first order of business would be CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 161(CRA) am, "An Act relating to municipal taxation of farm land and farm structures; and providing for an effective date." 8:02:40 AM SENATOR JESSE BJORKMAN, Alaska State Legislature, prime sponsor, gave an overview of CSSB 161(CRA) am. He stated that the bill would extend the property tax exemption from farm use lands to farm use buildings to allow the buildings to be taxed at the farm rate, not the full and true value assessment. Also, the bill would extend optional provisions for municipalities and political subdivisions to incorporate all farm buildings if they so choose. 8:05:07 AM LAURA ACHEE, Staff, Senator Jesse Bjorkman, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Senator Bjorkman, prime sponsor of CSSB 161(CRA) am, said she had nothing to add. SENATOR BJORKMAN noted that the current version before the committee included aquaculture. 8:06:03 AM CHAIR MCCORMICK opened public testimony on SB 161. 8:06:33 AM CAROLE TRIEM, Program Coordinator, Resilience Economies & Economies, Alaska Municipal League, testified during the hearing on CSSB 161(CRA) am. She commented on mandatory exemptions and how they reduce the local government's ability to raise revenue while doing nothing to reduce costs. She added that expanding mandatory exemptions shifts the tax burden to commercial property owners, residential homeowners, and renters. In addition, she said that expanding the mandatory exemption would lower the full value determination, which in turn, would lower the amount of funding a local government can give to the school district. She added that optional exemptions allow municipalities to provide fit for purpose policy that fits their local needs, so for that reason, she said the AML supports the removal of the requirement for the optional exemption to be put to voters, in addition to the expansion of the optional exemption. 8:08:34 AM BRAD ST. PIERRE, representing self, testified during the hearing on CSSB 161(CRA) am. He said he supports the tax exemption for farmers. He opined that there are two pieces of the bill that need to be amended, as they would negatively impact young farmers and their access to farm land. Firstly, he requested that the committee amend the bill to keep the public engaged and keep the vote of the people required on all tax exemption changes. Secondly, he opined that the state should keep the qualification for applicants to be proof that 10 percent of the farmer's total income comes from farming. He concluded that changing it to the ability to produce $1,000 in agricultural products and filing a schedule F would not support the type of farming that would bolster Alaska's food system. 8:12:26 AM SAVANNAH FLETCHER, Presiding Officer, Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly, testified during the hearing on CSSB 161(CRA) am. She confirmed that last year, Fairbanks passed Proposition 2 by an overwhelming majority, which provides a tax exemption for farm structures used exclusively for farming. Despite the suggestion from Legislative Legal Services that the bill would not nullify the municipal exemption, she expressed concern that the language in Section 1 would not allow the exemption to continue. She requested that the bill be amended to provide further clarity on this and sustain local power and local choice in setting the tax exemption. She explained that the $1,000 threshold would be a huge departure from the current standard of 10 percent of income, which, rather than encouraging additional farming, may support hobby farmers getting a big tax exemption without producing more food for the community to consume. In addition, she expressed concern about use of the word "normally" [on page 1, line 10] due to the USDA's interpretation of it and the potential for broad interpretation by assessors. Lastly, she expressed concern about the ability to assess farm structures if exclusive use would no longer be a requirement. REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked Ms. Fletcher to speak to the difference between 10 percent of yearly gross income versus $1,000 in sales. MS. FLETCHER said presumably, [10 percent] is a more stringent standard. She suggested implementing a flat number that's higher than $1,000. REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether the sharing of financial statements is the barrier, or whether the barrier is the money amount. MS FLETCHER said either way, some [financial statement] would need to be shared. She reiterated her concern that $1,000 would be too low to achieve the policy goal. REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked what the threshold should be if not 1,000. MS. FLETCHER deferred to the Alaska Farmers Market Association. She estimated that $5,000 would be closer to the target. 8:20:01 AM REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE questioned the change in revenue in Fairbanks prior to the public vote on [Proposition 2]. MS. FLETCHER said a conservative estimate suggests that this could take at least $7 million off the tax roll, as currently written, based on agricultural land at the 10 percent threshold. She noted that the tax exemption only passed [six months] ago, so she did not have the requested data. REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed concern that the term "hobby farms" was being used derisively. He opined that hobby farms are not necessarily a bad thing if they are growing their own food. 8:22:43 AM BONNE WOLDSTAD, representing self, testified during the hearing on CSSB 161(CRA) am. She suggested adding "on or" before the wording "before May 15" in the language pertaining to the Schedule F form in Section 3, subsection (f). She said she found it ironic that last year, the state of Alaska offered grants for the purchase of livestock feed to help sustain small farms at the same time that individuals were finding it increasingly difficult to apply for and receive the farm tax exemption. She said SB 161 would assist in keeping small farms operational in Alaska. CHAIR MCCORMICK closed public testimony on SB 161. 8:25:01 AM The committee took a brief at-ease. 8:26:05 AM CHAIR MCCORMICK sought questions from committee members. 8:26:19 AM REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked the bill sponsor to speak to the change from 10 percent of yearly gross income to $1,000 in sales. SENATOR BJORKMAN said Representative Himschoot was correct in identifying that the source of the standard to access the tax deferment came from the Food Strategy Taskforce. He agreed that farms often start small and then scale as they're able produce more food. He opined that the $1,000 threshold is a good place to start because individuls filing a schedule F would be telling the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that they are in the business of farming. He spoke to the purpose of the farm use rate. 8:28:58 AM REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether the schedule F form can only be filed by farmers. MS. ACHEE confirmed that only someone in the business of an agricultural operation would file a schedule F, including aquaculture and marijuana operations. REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT suggested that the filing of a schedule F would indicate that some portion of an individual's income came from farming. SENATOR BJORKMAN said, "That's correct." MS. ACHEE opined that it isn't practicable to only focus on large scale operations when it comes to increasing the food supply in Alaska. She emphasized the importance of making room for smaller operations that are creating a smaller change. 8:31:19 AM CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that CSSB 161(CRA) am would be held over.