Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/10/2022 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB156 | |
| HB123 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 66 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 167 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 156-PROHIBIT COVID-19 VACCINE DISCRIMINATION
3:40:27 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 156
"An Act relating to COVID-19 immunization rights; and relating
to objection to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine."
He noted that the bill was heard on 2/8/22 and public testimony
was heard and held open. His office had received no amendments
and the deadline had passed.
3:40:53 PM
CHAIR SHOWER ascertained that no one wished to testify and
closed public testimony on SB 156.
He asked the sponsor if she had any closing comments.
3:41:30 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD said she would like to hear from Megan Wallace
before she made a final statement.
CHAIR SHOWER stated that during the first hearing he asked the
sponsor about the constitutional implication of telling private
citizens what they can or cannot do when running their business.
He asked Ms. Wallace to comment.
3:43:44 PM
MEGAN WALLACE, Director, Legislative Legal Services, Legislative
Affairs Agency, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, stated
that the language in SB 156 is similar to a bill that the
Montana State Legislature passed in 2021. That legislation has
been challenged in both federal and state court. The claims
include that the law violates certain parts of the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Occupational Safety and Health
Act (OSHA), and certain constitutional provisions in Montana
relating to the right to a clean and healthy environment as well
as equal protection claims. Those cases are in the early stages
so the law is in effect at this point.
In federal court the judge recently ruled on a motion to dismiss
the plaintiffs' claim. The state constitutional environmental
claim was dismissed but the remainder of the plaintiffs' claims
survived and the case will go to trial. The plaintiffs request
for an injunction in state court to prevent the law from going
into effect was denied. The judge held that the plaintiffs did
not meet the burden for a preliminary injunction and the bill
went into effect.
MS. WALLACE stated that this is an emerging issue in law and
there is some risk of litigation if the bill were to become law.
CHAIR SHOWER said he wanted this discussion on the record to
make the legislative intent clear. He offered his opinion that
the only potential issue is paragraph (2) on page 2, [lines 8-
12]. It is specifically about an employer who has no tie to the
government.
CHAIR SHOWER asked Ms. Wallace if his question and her answer
was clear that this is "only and specifically addressed to a
private individual, not any of the other circumstances."
MS. WALLACE responded that, regarding his specific question, her
answer does not change. Her research of claims indicates that
even if it is a private business, there is a possibility that
employees in that private business will bring a challenge. She
said she could not predict how a court might rule; she was
advising that there is a risk of litigation.
3:48:54 PM
CHAIR SHOWER asked if private businesses face a significant risk
of liability if they were to require employees to be vaccinated.
MS. WALLACE responded that she did not want to speculate on
claims that may be brought should an employee be injured as a
result of an employers vaccine mandate. She acknowledged that
there are private companies that have required vaccination and
said she is anecdotally aware of litigation stemming from those
mandates. She opined that there is potential for litigation
whether an employer is prohibited from requiring employees to
have vaccines or an employer requires employees to have
vaccines.
CHAIR SHOWER offered his belief that private companies are far
out on a limb in this case.
3:51:53 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD thanked Ms. Wallace for discussing all sides of
the issue. She called SB 156 a very important bill on a matter
that has struck a nerve. Medical decisions should be between the
individual and their physician and employers should not
intervene in that relationship.
CHAIR SHOWER said he appreciated the debate on the
constitutional question but he sees the privacy aspect as well.
3:56:13 PM
CHAIR SHOWER found no further questions or comments and
solicited a motion.
3:56:23 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD moved to report SB 156, work order 32-LS1352\I,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR SHOWER found no objection and SB 156 was reported from the
Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2.10.22_HB 123 powerpoint.pdf |
SSTA 2/10/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| 2.10.22_HB 123 POWERPOINT UPDATED 2-10-22.pdf |
SSTA 2/10/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| email of support 2-10-22 Jessica.pdf |
SSTA 2/10/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 167 |
| support mayor bronson.pdf |
SSTA 2/10/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 123 |