Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/01/2005 01:00 PM Senate FINANCE
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 136 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 121 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 230 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | HB 19 | ||
| = | HB 15 | ||
SENATE BILL NO. 156
"An Act relating to notification to teachers of layoff or
nonretention."
AT EASE: 1:41:39 PM / 1:41:50 PM
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
PHELAN STRAUBE, Staff to Senator Ben Stevens, the bill's sponsor,
informed the Committee that this bill would address what is
referred to "as the pink slip problem by aligning tenured teachers
with non-tenured teachers within the law". Currently, tenured
teachers must be notified by March 16th of each year that "they
would not be retained for the following school year". "Non-tenured
teachers must be notified by the last day of the school term". This
legislation would align the two schedules by specifying that in
both cases, the termination notification must be received by the
end of the school term.
1:42:32 PM
Co-Chair Green inquired as to how this issue was brought to the
attention of the Legislature.
Mr. Straube replied that the primary issue is that neither local
city/school assemblies' budgets nor the State's budget for the
following fiscal year are completed by March 16th of each year. The
requirement that notification must be provided by that date leads
to a sense of instability on the part of teachers and speculation
on the part of the school districts in regards to the funding level
they would receive for the following school year.
Co-Chair Green ascertained therefore that the March 16th
notification date has proven to be more harmful than beneficial.
Mr. Straube agreed. "It creates instability for teachers and for
school districts; it unnecessarily scares parents and teachers."
Co-Chair Green asked whether this issue has ever been "challenged."
Mr. Straube had not discovered any challenge during his research on
the issue. The practice was created in the 1960s "and has not been
addressed since".
Co-Chair Green stated that while this is "a long-standing policy",
it is inconsistent with budget cycles and is not beneficial to
those concerned.
Co-Chair Wilken moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, the SB 156 was REPORTED from Committee
with previous zero fiscal note #1, dated April 18, 2005 from the
Department of Education and Early Development.
1:45:02 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|