Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/07/1997 05:16 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 154(HES)
"An Act relating to paternity determination and child
support; relating to reporting of and access to financial
or other information for child support purposes; making
changes to laws relating to occupational, recreational,
or other licenses, permits, certificates, or other
authorizations issued by the state to facilitate
administration of child support laws; relating to the
interest rate on judgments or decrees for child support;
relating to immunity from civil liability for good faith
compliance with reporting or other requirements for child
support purposes; relating to voiding fraudulent transfers
and to penalties for noncompliance with orders for child
support purposes; amending Rules 4, 5, 35, 52, 58,
60(b), 78, 90.1, and 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure;
amending Rule 901, Alaska Rules of Evidence; amending
Rules 3 and 5, Alaska Bar Association Rules; repealing
the effective date of sec. 45, ch. 107, SLA 1996; and
providing for an effective date."
Glenda Straube, Child Support Enforcement was invited to
join the committee. She explained the HES version of the
bill before the committee. It included changes in federal
mandates applicable for all states.
Jim Nordlund, Division of Public Assistance was invited to
join the committee. He said this bill, if passed into law
would result in penalties for violators. With reference to
the impact on the agency, he said it would be difficult if
federal funds were lost due to non-compliance. The
Department of Health and Social Services supported the bill.
Ms. Straube explained the bill section by section. She
specifically referred to new hire reporting and said all
employers must report new or re-hires within twenty days.
Senator Parnell asked about section 76 on page 29, line 27.
Ms. Straube said she did not know who would make the
determinations. She noted that crew member fishing licenses
were added in to the bill. Social security numbers must be
on all documents and shared with all child support agencies.
However, the information was only to be used for child
support purposes.
Senator Phillips asked about the right to privacy with
regards to the social security number and would this be a
violation of one's constitutional rights.
Dan Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law
was invited to join the committee. He said the social
security number was protected by federal law. He would look
up and provide the necessary information to the committee
with regards to use of the social security number. Senator
Phillips had noted that one does not have to list their
social security number on documents any more.
Ms. Straube continued explaining the bill. She said once
established, paternity could not be rescinded after sixty
days without court process. Punitive fathers could request
blood tests and the Division would provide these tests. She
further said all agencies must provide employment records as
applicable because there could be multiple cases involving
the same party. A state agency or a court order could
require a participant to be employed. She cited cases where
individuals were appropriately employed and now paying child
support payments. The State of Alaska also respects liens
from other states. The department recognized use of first
class mail after all diligent methods had been exhausted to
notify the individual regarding child support. There was no
statute of limitations on reporting arrears to the credit
bureau. Further not mandated but included in the bill was:
1. one rate of interest for the child support debt (see
section 12 and 13, judgments and decrees); 2. the child
support order would be corrected if based on fraudulent
information.
Senator Torgerson asked about section 13 (AS 25.27.025).
Ms. Straube indicated she would provide requested
information after research. Under section 111 she said no
could withhold employment if it was known the perspective
employee owed child support. It should be clearly known the
individual is responsible for the child whether a court
order for child support is received or not.
There was miscellaneous discussion between Senator Parnell
and Ms. Straube regarding enforcement of child support. She
did indicate that the department could not override a court
order. Further under section 111, (5), everything would
automatically conform according to federal mandate.
Senator Torgerson asked if passage of this bill was urgent
and Ms. Straube indicated that it was.
Co-chair Sharp held the bill in committee and advised that
he would bring it up again on tomorrow morning's calendar.
ADJOURNMENT
Co-chair Sharp adjourned the session at 6:32 p.m. until
tomorrow morning.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|