Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
01/31/2008 02:00 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Achia Update | |
| HB226 | |
| SB153 | |
| SB187 | |
| SB197 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 153 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 187 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 197 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 226 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 153-PEACE OFFICERS/FIRE FIGHTER RETIREMENT
2:49:25 PM
CHAIR ELLIS announced SB 153 to be up for consideration.
SENATOR FRENCH, sponsor of SB 153, read his sponsor statement:
Current law allows a police officer or firefighter who
has also served in the armed forces to count five
years of military service towards their Public
Employees Retirement System retirement, provided that
two conditions are met. First, the employee must not
be eligible for a federal retirement benefit and
second, the employee must "buy" those military service
years by paying for them.
The shortcoming with the current system is that the
military years purchased towards a state retirement do
not count towards qualifying for retiree medical
benefits. Moreover, many of those who are buying in
presume that they are getting just that coverage. Thus
the need for SB 153. This legislation corrects what
many with former military service assume when
purchasing military time: that the time purchased will
be credited to their medical benefits as well as their
retirement.
This bill simply allows for the same purchase of years
to count towards retirement and medical benefits.
The bill does not allow any double dipping because the
potential state retiree must not be eligible for
federal military benefits in order to qualify for the
purchase in the first place.
SB 153 recognizes the contribution made by police
officers and fire fighters who have both served our
country through the military and now pursue careers to
protect and defend our state and communities.
2:51:11 PM
SENATOR FRENCH asked the committee to remember there is no
double-dipping. If you have served 20 years in the military and
you are eligible for a military pension, you cannot buy into
this program. You have to be eligible for either one or the
other.
He explained that as the program stands now you can buy those
five years of retirement time, but you don't get medical
benefits. So the idea is to just complete the step that was made
when the program was first extended to the state's police
officers and firefighters and to let it be applied evenly across
the board.
2:51:57 PM
SENATOR BUNDE asked if this would apply to people who worked for
a fairly short time for the state, because if they had worked
for an extended period of 10 or 15 years, they would
automatically qualify for the health benefit through vesting.
SENATOR FRENCH replied you first have to get to 20 years of
service with the state. You can't buy your 25 years in essence
by having served only 10 years. You have to have the 20 years in
in order to buy the last 5 - and you can only buy 5.
SENATOR BUNDE asked how much it would cost the individual to buy
the health benefit.
SENATOR FRENCH replied that it would cost the same as was
indicated on the PERS chart.
SENATOR BUNDE clarified that his concern was on the fiscal
impact to the health care system.
SENATOR FRENCH replied that SB 153 has two department fiscal
notes; a zero fiscal note from the Department of Public Safety
(DPS) and two from the Department of Administration (DOA) -
first a small one and then a much bigger one arrived today. He
said communication is going on with the administration about
what the problem was with its assumptions.
CHAIR ELLIS said he wanted a well-reasoned fiscal note before
the committee before the bill would be considered again.
SENATOR FRENCH said the most recent fiscal note he received
walked into his office an hour ago.
2:55:27 PM
COLONEL AUDIE HOLLOWAY, Director, Alaska State Troopers,
Department of Public Safety (DPS), supported the concept of SB
153 because it would help with recruiting and keeping older
troopers. He had some concerns, however, and for one didn't want
to make the PERS liability worse. He could testify much more
confidently with a more definite fiscal note.
CHAIR ELLIS said that he would hold the bill until they could
pin the numbers down.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|