Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/09/2003 09:05 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 153
"An Act authorizing a long-term lease of certain Alaska
Railroad Corporation land at Anchorage; and providing for an
effective date."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Wilken explained that this legislation "would allow the
Alaska Railroad to lease certain corporation land in Anchorage for
a period in excess of 55 years without reserving the right to
terminate the lease."
RICHARD SCHMITZ, Staff to Senator John Cowdery, explained that the
purpose of this legislation is to allow Alaska Enfranchise
Facilities, Inc to build a multi-family, senior housing project on
leased Alaska Railroad land on Government Hill in Anchorage,
utilizing a federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Section 2,
grant. He continued that "the way the law now reads, the Alaska
Railroad can approve leases in excess of 55 years; however, the
railroad must reserve the right to terminate the leases in the
event the land is needed for railroad purposes." However, he
continued, recently enacted federal regulations require a minimum
75-year lease, and in order to accommodate this grant's timeline
requirement, this bill seeks to remove the termination clause from
the lease agreement. He noted that State statute allows the Alaska
Railroad to request this language exemption as exampled by previous
legislation, CS HB 344(FIN) [copy on file].
Mr. Schmitz noted that Alaska Enfranchise Facilities, Inc. has
received a 55-year lease, but requires this legislation to
accommodate the federal grant provisions.
SFC 03 # 43, Side B 09:52 AM
MARC MARLOW, Alaska Enfranchise Facilities, Inc., testified via
teleconference from Anchorage to explain that Alaska Enfranchise
Facilities, Inc (AEF) is a 501-C3 non-profit entity, which proposes
to construct senior housing on the property it is leasing from the
Alaska Railroad. However, he continued, in order to qualify for two
federal grants to fund the project, a 75-year lease must be in
place.
SUSANNE DIPEITRO, Co-President, Government Hill Community Council
(GHCC), testified via teleconference from Anchorage to voice
concerns regarding this lease. She informed the Committee that two
entities were interested in leasing the land and applying for the
HUD grants; and, she opined, Mr. Marlow signed the lease paperwork
with the knowledge that the 55-year lease did not qualify for the
HUD grant. Now, she continued, after eliminating "the competitive
process," he is "asking for you to essentially change the terms of
the lease," so that he can qualify for money that the other
applicant does not have the benefit of."
Ms. DiPeitro continued that the GHSS would like to participate in
the discussion regarding what is constructed on the site. She
continued that she has furthered this request with Mr. Marlow, and
she voiced that "an understanding" about this communication could
be possible; however, she stated, the Community Council is on
record in opposition to this legislation.
Co-chair Wilken noted that the Committee has a letter [copy on
file] from the GHSS, dated March 21, 2003, stating its position. He
specified that the information supplied by Alaska Enfranchise
Facilities, Inc. titled "Providing safe, Clean and affordable
Housing for Alaskan Seniors" [copy on file] has also been received.
Co-Chair Green asked Mr. Marlow for information regarding other
legislation that he has previously submitted to the Legislature.
Mr. Marlow responded that he was involved in legislation "to amend
Alaska Statute 45 that would have allowed municipalities to extend
property tax relief to projects that would provide for facilitating
urban redevelopment."
Co-Chair Green asked the name of the building that legislation
involved.
Mr. Marlow identified the building as the McKay Building in
downtown Anchorage.
Co-Chair Green asked whether the previous request involved more
than one piece of legislation.
Mr. Marlow stated that the bill was introduced in one Legislative
session, but was not acted upon. Therefore, he continued, it was
re-introduced the following session.
Co-Chair Wilken ordered the bill HELD in Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|