Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
02/18/2014 05:00 PM House RULES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB148 | |
| HB19 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 148 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 148-KACHEMAK BAY CRITICAL HABITAT AREA
5:05:12 PM
CHAIR JOHNSON announced that the first order of business would
be SENATE BILL NO. 148, "An Act excluding certain land from the
Kachemak Bay Critical Habitat Area."
5:05:34 PM
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, Alaska State Legislature, speaking as
the sponsor of SB 148, explained that the legislation excludes
the Homer Harbor and a small area that is planned for future
harbor and deep water dock expansions from the Kachemak Bay
Critical Habitat Area because the plan never intended to include
municipal harbors within the critical habitat area; the
statutory boundary was essentially incorrect. The Homer Harbor
provides a secure and environmentally responsible place to store
and maintain vessels that support the oil and gas industry.
However, for infrastructure to be repaired or vessels to be
anchored for more than 14 days in the Homer Harbor, permits have
to be obtained. He then related that the Alaska Department of
Fish & Game (ADF&G) is in support of SB 148 as is the Homer City
Council. Local environmental nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs) are primarily in support of full disclosure. He noted
that the Kachemak Bay Conservation Society, the only opposition
he has heard, has concerns in that they don't believe equipment
used to drill for oil and gas should be kept in a harbor. In
closing, Senator Micciche reiterated that the Homer Harbor was
never intended to be included in the critical habit area, and
thus SB 148 removes the Homer Harbor and allows it be used as
other harbors.
5:07:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON inquired as to whether there is a location
outside of the Homer Harbor that the oil and gas drilling
equipment could be kept.
SENATOR MICCICHE opined that the oil and gas drilling equipment
is currently stored in locations that he believes are not as
safe, secure, or protected as it could be. He specified that
the Homer City Council is in unanimous support of SB 148 and
other local NGOs with a fairly extensive membership are in
support [of SB 148] because of the protected nature of keeping
oil and gas drilling equipment in the harbor area. In further
response to Representative Herron, Senator Micciche related his
belief that the opposition is from a group of folks that do not
envision Kachemak Bay having anything to do with resource
extraction.
5:08:46 PM
CHAIR JOHNSON opened public testimony.
5:09:26 PM
STUART SCHMUTZLER began by reminding the committee that people
are capable of destroying habitat for many other species,
including habitat that provides us with foods to survive.
Therefore, he opined that people have a tremendous
responsibility not to damage or destroy these habitats merely
for the short-term economic gain today; preserving habitat for
the future is important. The Homer economy, he opined, has done
quite well without storing vehicles from an industry that could
pollute and damage the waters in a designated critical habitat
area. Mr. Schmutzler encouraged the committee to maintain the
critical habitat area designation for the area.
5:11:13 PM
CHAIR JOHNSON, upon determining no one else wished to testify,
closed public testimony.
5:11:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG, referring to an aerial map entitled
"Proposed Exclusion to the Kachemak Bay Critical Habitat Area"
in the committee packet, inquired as to the area withdrawn from
the critical habitat area.
SENATOR MICCICHE answered that everything currently in the
existing Kachemak Bay Critical Habitat Area remains, except the
little triangle designating the area to be removed. The
legislation merely defines what was intended not to be included
in the critical habitat area and removes the ambiguity.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG related his understanding then that the
area being removed isn't the Homer spit itself, but is basically
the area off the shore and the harbor.
SENATOR MICCICHE clarified that the spit was not originally
included in the critical habitat area and the legislation does
remove the harbor and the area just outside of the harbor. The
legislation defines the boundaries legally.
5:14:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT moved to report SB 148 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying [zero]
fiscal note. There being no objection, SB 148 was reported from
the House Rules Standing Committee and is available for
calendaring.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 148 vs A.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM SRES 2/5/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SB 148 |
| SB 148 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM SRES 2/5/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SB 148 |
| SB 148 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
SB 148 |
| SB 148 Supp Resolution City of Homer 14-005 20140113.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM SRES 2/5/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SB 148 |
| SB 148 Map Proposed Exclusion to the Kachemak Bay Critical Habitat Area DNR.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM SRES 2/5/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SB 148 |
| HB 19 DMV MVRT Imformation.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 DMV Eligible Registration Classes.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Support Letters.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Opposition Letters.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| CSHB 19(TRA) Fiscal Note DOA-DMV 2-15-13.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| CSHB 19(TRA) Fiscal Note DOA-DMV 3-20-13.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| CSHB 19(TRA) FY 2015 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| CS HB 19(TRA) Amendment 1 U.4.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB19 Version A.pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| CS HB 19(TRA).pdf |
HRLS 2/18/2014 5:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |