Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/15/2022 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB136 | |
| SB92 | |
| SB145 | |
| SB152 | |
| HB148 | |
| HB123 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 136 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 152 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 148 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 145 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 147 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 145-LEGISLATOR RETROACTIVE PER DIEM
4:17:56 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 145
"An Act relating to per diem for legislators; and providing for
an effective date."
[The bill was previously heard on 2/1/2022.]
4:18:23 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND, speaking as sponsor of SB 145, recapped that
the current statute regarding per diem for legislators states
that legislators are not entitled to daily per diem for the
period that a budget is not in place [after the 121st day]. That
has somehow been interpreted to mean that legislators are
allowed retroactive per diem payments. SB 145 honors the intent
of a past ballot initiative and quells the concern that
legislators have a monetary incentive to go into special session
before passing the operating budget.
4:20:04 PM
SENATOR KAWASAKI questioned whether this would give the
executive branch an advantage when it negotiates the budget with
the legislative branch. He offered his experience that special
sessions are often because of the "Third Floor."
SENATOR HOLLAND replied he did not believe that separation of
powers was involved. The bill simply seeks to clarify what is
already in statute.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked whether the budget would need to pass
both bodies to be considered passed.
SENATOR HOLLAND offered his belief that both bodies would need
to pass the budget and send it to the governor.
CHAIR SHOWER pointed to the last sentence in Section 1, which is
in current statute.
In this subsection, "passed by the legislature" has
the meaning given in AS 01.10.070.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked the sponsor if he had contemplated that
if the budget is not passed before day 121, there could be an
incentive to move the special session to a community where a
majority of legislators live and would not collect per diem.
SENATOR HOLLAND said he wasn't sure what she was asking.
4:23:15 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO said she supports aligning laws with voters'
intent when they pass initiatives, but her concern is that some
people may not be able to afford to do without per diem and that
may have unintended consequences.
4:24:16 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND said the concern about creating a legislature of
elite incomes would not be a problem if legislators were to
prioritize the job of passing the budget in 121 days. He added
that he would support leaving the capital in Juneau but moving
the legislature to Anchorage.
CHAIR SHOWER pointed out that legislatures in some states, Texas
for example, meet every other year and get the job done.
SENATOR HOLLAND said the legislature does get distracted with
issues like the size of the permanent fund dividend (PFD) and
that should be fixed so it's automatic. He noted that the Fiscal
Plan Working Group pushed for that last year. He offered his
view that collecting $300 per day in per diem after day 121
could be a motivation to not pass the budget timely. He
disclosed that he did not collect per diem in the first or
second special session last year to honor the intent of the
voters when they passed the initiative on the topic of per diem.
SENATOR REINBOLD commented that leadership will have to lead to
ensure that the Senate receives the budget from the House before
it's down to the wire. She added that she believes the budget
process is backwards and the solution is to place a cap on the
budget. She voiced support for the bill and thanked the sponsor
for bringing it forward.
CHAIR SHOWER commented on the difference between talking about
moving the legislature as opposed to moving the capital.
4:29:16 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND summarized that SB 145 does not change the law;
it reinforces and clarifies the existing statute.
CHAIR SHOWER held SB 145 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 152 Sectional Analysis 1.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 152 |
| SB 152 sponsor statement 1.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 152 |
| sb136 non support emails.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| SB 152 32-LS1306-B work draft.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 152 |
| I support SB136 7 emails.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| fiscal note 2022.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| SB 136 EMAILS OF SUPPORT 40 TOTAL.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| SB 136 EMAILS OF SUPPORT 38 TOTAL.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| sb136 support emails.pdf 44.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| I support SB136 7 emails.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| AK SB 136 - NRA Testimony - Emergency Powers - SUPPORT 2-31-22.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| HB 123 support emails 3.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| SB 136 3 e mails of support.pdf |
SSTA 2/15/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |