Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/01/2022 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB136 | |
| SB147 | |
| SB145 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HJR 16 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 136 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 147 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 145 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 145-LEGISLATOR RETROACTIVE PER DIEM
3:59:39 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 145
"An Act relating to per diem for legislators; and providing for
an effective date."
4:00:17 PM
SENATOR ROGER HOLLAND, speaking as sponsor of SB 145, read the
sponsor statement into the record:
[Original punctuation provided.]
In 2018, the legislature passed an ethics reform bill
in HB 44. This legislation was deemed substantially
similar to a citizen's initiative signed by over
40,000 Alaskans Removing the issue from the ballot.
One of the key components of the initiative was to end
per diem payments if a budget had not been passed by
the end of the 121-day session, and not to allow per
diem payments to resume until after a budget had been
passed. The public reportedly viewed this provision as
an incentive for legislators to finish their work
without subjecting government employees to the
uncertainty brought on by perpetual pink slips.
To the dismay of many supporters of the initiative,
legislative council later decided that legislators
could receive retroactive back-pay for their missed
per diem payments once the budget passed. This
apparent circumvention of the process strikes many
voters as dishonest and erodes public trust. Very
simply, the lack of per diem payments provides an
incentive to finish our one true job of providing a
budget in a timely fashion before the end of the
regular session. Allowing either per diem payments or
retroactive per diem payments creates an incentive to
not pass a budget on time.
SB 145 seeks to remedy the situation by prohibiting
retroactive per diem payments after a failure to pass
a budget during the regular session and disallowing
per diem payments to resume until after a budget is
passed. I believe this bill takes a step toward
restoring that public's trust and aligns the law with
the intent of the citizens.
4:02:27 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND presented the sectional analysis for SB 145.
[Original punctuation provided with some formatting changes.]
Sec. 1
Amends AS 24.10.130(b), relating to legislative per
diem, to prohibit the retroactive authorization of per
diem for legislators beginning the day after the 121st
day of the legislative session until the day a fully
funded operating budget is passed by the legislature.
Sec. 2
Provides for an immediate effective date.
4:03:02 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND summarized that the fiscal impact of SB 145 is
indeterminate because nobody knows how many days it will take to
pass an operating budget after the 121st day of a regular
session.
He added that enacting this legislation will result in savings
because per diem would not be paid after day 121.
CHAIR SHOWER offered his belief that this would not be an
additive cost.
SENATOR HOLLAND said the simple reading of the statute is that
legislators are not entitled to per diem after day 121 if the
budget has not passed. SB 145 clarifies that per diem may not be
paid retroactively.
4:04:42 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD said she likes the bill and it matches the
intent of the ballot initiative.
CHAIR SHOWER commented on learning about the ballot initiative
and per diem when he was a freshman legislator. He expressed
appreciation that SB 145 clarifies and codifies what happens.
4:07:06 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND commented that the legislature paid per diem
retroactively but has not been honoring the statutory PFD. He
opined that SB 145 will go a long way toward putting faith and
confidence back in the legislature.
CHAIR SHOWER said this puts downward pressure on legislators to
do the right thing.
4:09:12 PM
CHAIR SHOWER held SB 145 in committee for future consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 147 Hearing Request 1.31.22.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 147 Presentation 2.1.22.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 147 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 147 Support Letter Life Alaska.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 147 v. B Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 147 v. B.PDF |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 136_Testimony - Received as of 5.13.2021.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 136 |
| SB 147 Fiscal Note 2348 - DOA.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 147 |
| SB 145 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 145 |
| SB 145 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 145 |
| SB 145 Legislation Version A.PDF |
SSTA 2/1/2022 3:30:00 PM |
SB 145 |