Legislature(2005 - 2006)BUTROVICH 205
03/21/2005 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB85 | |
| SB144 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 85 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 144-EMISSION CONTROL PROGRAM PERMITS/REGS
CHAIR THOMAS WAGONER announced SB 144 to be up for
consideration.
4:28:15 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved CSSB 144(RES), Version F. There were no
objections and it was so ordered.
MARY JACKSON, staff to Senator Wagoner, said the discussion on
this bill has been around its definitions on page 6. "Stationary
source" has the meaning given in 40 C.F.R. 51.66 and SB 144
inserts "or 40 C.F.R. 70.2, depending on the context in which
the term is used." The department did not feel comfortable
working with the previous definition. It was felt that the most
reasonable way to clarify it was to reference federal
definitions. She pointed out that SB 144 has a zero fiscal note.
4:30:36 PM
SENATOR GUESS asked about the impact and purpose of the July 1,
2005 effective date.
MS. JACKSON deferred the answer to the department.
4:31:01 PM
JOHN KUTERBACH, Manager, Air Permits Program, Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC), explained that two years ago
Governor Murkowski started to reform Alaska's air permit
programs to better meet the needs of our state.
The reforms were intended to make Alaska's air permit
programs more consistent with the underlying federal
requirements. Consistency with federal law would allow
Alaska to take advantage of the flexibility afforded
by changes in federal law and to follow the guidance
and interpretations used elsewhere in the nation. We
have completed the necessary regulations and are ready
to submit them for federal approval. However, we found
several places where the statute did not quite meet
federal requirements.
We need to require operating permits for groups of
stationery sources. We need the definitions of
'emissions unit' and 'stationery source' to include
both the federal construction permit and the federal
operating permit definitions. And we need to insure
that all permittees pay their assessed emission fees.
This bill makes these technical corrections and allows
the department to revoke a minor permit when a
permittee refuses to pay their fees.
4:32:41 PM
MS. JACKSON repeated Senator Guess's question about the July 1,
2005 effective date.
MR. KUTERBACH replied that he wasn't certain, but suspected that
it might have to do with the fact that the permitting fees have
a split in their fund source that occurs at the beginning of
next fiscal year.
CHAIR WAGONER said that Steve Mulder from the Department of Law
could answer further legal questions. There was no further
testimony.
4:33:54 PM
SENATOR DYSON moved to pass CSSB 144(RES) from committee with
individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was
so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|