Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/20/1999 01:37 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 141-PROCUREMENT: CONTRACTS/SUBCONTRACTS
MR. JEREMY KERR, UAS Intern for Senator Leman, said SB 141 was
introduced at the request of DOTPF to give the Department greater
flexibility in contracts known as "design build", where the owner
(in this case, the state) chooses a contractor that will build as
well as design a project. Two examples of this are the M/V
Kennicott and the Whittier Tunnel. Usually, the owner picks a
design and then has the contractor build it.
This bill is in the best interest of the State and will only affect
state contracts. Current law states that construction contractors
must list the subcontractors they plan on using within five days of
the award of the contract. Because of the nature of design build
contracts, it is not always possible for the contractor to identify
the needed subcontractors. This provides flexibility to DOTPF to
allow contractors to provide that information at a later date.
This bill also changes a request to change contractors to be in
writing.
MR. KERR said there is no opposition from either the design or
construction community that they know of.
CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked what was the fiscal impact of this bill.
MR. KERR said there were zero fiscal impacts.
Number 320
MR. MARK O'BRIEN, Chief Contracts Officer, DOTPF, said that the two
issues they are trying to address are design/build construction
contracts where they cannot list subcontractors within five days.,
because in a lot of cases, they don't know whether it's going to be
a piling contractor or a concrete contractor for the design of the
foundation of a building, for instance. The second thing this does
is allow them to substitute or add subcontractors when it's in the
state's best interest. An example of this would be discovering
that you need an asbestos or lead abatement contractor after
starting the project.
SENATOR LEMAN asked how often the Department uses the design/build
approach versus the more conventional approach.
MR. O'BRIEN answered rarely. He is aware of only two last year and
about five in the last three years. A number of them have been
sand storage buildings.
SENATOR LEMAN said the CS has a new Section 3 which rewords
language to give comfort to the design community about what
conditions in AS 36.30.115 may still apply. It doesn't change any
of the substance.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to adopt the Banister CS to SB 141. There were
no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSSB 141 from committee with individual
recommendations with the zero fiscal note. There were no
objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|