Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/23/2001 01:44 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 135-MENTAL HEALTH INFO/RECORDS/COMMUNICATIONS
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR announced SB 135 to be up for consideration.
TAPE 01-22, SIDE A
MS. PAT DAVIDSON, legislative auditor, said, "Without data, the
Department is unable to determine if services are being paid dual
billed, paid for both with Medicaid funds and state funds nor can
they offer the providers feedback about services and associated
costs."
SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if this concern came from the findings of
an audit.
MS. DAVIDSON answered yes. The first audit was on mental health
services in 1997. Senate Finance was concerned about escalating
costs in that program. They found and in the subsequent follow-up
(January 2001) is that a fee for service Medicaid financing plan
and a state funded grant program are inherently difficult to work
with. Providing client data to the Department to do the analysis
will allow that Department to actually manage the program the way
it needs to be done.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted for the record that he was the one who
requested that audit in 1997. He added that:
We found that the reserve accounts of a couple of our
larger providers had grown significantly to the place
where they had between half and two-thirds of a year cash
income reserves setting in their account. Nobody was
asking them to spend down those reserves before we gave
them state money even though my mental health programs in
Ketchikan and other places where communities assisted
them, before the community would step in and assist, they
would make sure those reserves were spent down to the
place where they had maybe a month or six weeks worth of
reserves. Some of these larger entities had six to nine
months reserves and were paying themselves significant
salary increases. In one year, south central paid a 14
percent across the board salary increase to every one of
the employers, including their executive director, which
would have violated state law, had they been paying it
under state monies…
SENATOR ELLIS asked why the entire mental health record of an
individual client is needed. He asked if it was possible to
transmit only the information that was necessary for the express
purpose. He also said that the broad title of this bill troubles
him, although there was nothing specific he wanted to preclude.
Number 364
MS. ANN HENRY, Special Projects Coordinator, Division of Mental
Health and Developmental Disabilities, answered Senator Ellis'
question saying:
The information that we gather is demographic information
that uses a unique identifier rather than the
individual's name and social security number. We use
initials, the last four digits of the social security
number and the person's birth date to identify that
person and then link that person to subsequent documents,
which give information about the kind of encounters they
have had, the duration of the encounter, that sort of
thing…
She said they don't request the entire file or go through progress
notes. "It's just the diagnosis, the person's housing situation,
their legal status, things like that that allow us to determine
what kind of help different communities need and what we're seeing
in the big picture for the mental health situation for the state."
SENATOR THERRIAULT said, "We need to get enough information so that
we can track how services are being offered to this person. If
we're looking for some accountability, you've got to know what the
person is getting."
He also explained regarding the title, that when he had the bill
drafted, he wasn't anticipating any chicanery or things tacked on.
He wasn't opposed to tightening the title.
MS. HENRY continued saying that her division had worked with the
community mental health providers for several years trying to get
this data from them and haven't been successful for various
reasons. She said the lawsuit by the Board of the Mental Health
Center that was suing will be put aside with passage of this bill.
That is why the bill covers some of the issues that it covers. She
explained that they had also amended the initial bill to include
requiring that the mental health centers provide data for the last
two years.
SENATOR THERRIAULT said that the lawsuit was initiated by a
Fairbanks provider and he concurred that they backed away from the
litigation with the introduction of this bill.
SENATOR ELLIS moved to tighten up the title to SB 135. There were
no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR COWDERY moved to pass CSSB 135(JUD) from committee with
individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|