Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 211
03/25/2009 08:00 AM Senate EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB134 | |
| SB105 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 134 | ||
SB 134-PRUDENT MANAGEMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS
VICE CHAIR BETTYE DAVIS announced consideration of SB 134.
SENATOR PASKVAN, sponsor of SB 134, said the state should
consider adopting this bill because it will make sure that the
best investment practices will govern the actual investment of
institutional funds; it will withdraw obsolete rules governing
prudent total return expenditure and provide a modern rule of
prudence consistent with the rules that will govern the
investment. It will eliminate the differences in investment in
expenditure rules that apply to different types of non-profit
organizations - in other words, the same rules will govern under
all of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act
(UMPIFA). It will encourage the growth of institutional funds
while eliminating investment risk that threaten principal, and
will assure that there are adequate assets in any institutional
fund to meet program needs, and it will be part of a uniform
national system.
SENATOR PASKVAN said he has letters of support from the
University of Alaska Foundation, The Foraker Group, and the
Rasmussen Foundation. These organizations believe this will get
st
Alaska where it should be in the 21 Century.
8:06:10 AM
SENATOR HUGGINS joined the meeting.
DANA OWEN, staff to the Education committee, advised that the
committee substitute (CS) to SB 134, version \S, incorporates
two changes on page 8, line 21 where "endowment" replaces
"institutional" and on line 24 where "institution" and
"institutional fund" replace "endowment". This is in response to
suggestions by the University and the University Foundation that
noted some of their funds don't qualify technically as
"endowment funds," and they wanted to make sure that they came
under the provisions of the act.
SENATOR HUGGINS moved to adopt CSSB 134, labeled 26-LS0487,
Version S, as the working document of the committee.
VICE CHAIR DAVIS objected for discussion.
SENATOR STEVENS asked what difference those term changes made.
What University funds might they be able to invest because it's
called "institutional funds" not "endowment funds."
SENATOR PASKVAN replied that it was to make sure its application
was as broad as possible. An "endowment fund" on page 6 has a
more narrow definition than "institutional fund." This bill was
sent back to the national committee by Alaska's member and their
recommendation was to substitute "institutional" for
"endowment".
8:08:58 AM
JIM LYNCH, University of Alaska Foundation, Anchorage, AK, said
that Senator Paskvan was correct. They are trying to assure that
what Alaska has is consistent with other states' uniform laws.
It is designed for prudent investment of all types of charitable
organizations that are non-profits.
8:09:51 AM
SENATOR OLSON asked how long the commission has been in place
and what its success rate is with regard to managing funds.
SENATOR PASKVAN replied that this is designed to define
"prudence" so that funds don't dissipate over time, but at the
same time recognizing that in difficult economic times, prudence
may include disbursing from the principal.
8:11:39 AM
SENATOR OLSON asked what has happened to the funds managed by
this group during the 2001 downturn and now during the global
recession.
SENATOR PASKVAN replied that many institutional funds are below
their original contributed capital amount. Mr. Lynch from the
University Foundation in his testimony last week indicated that
of the University's 500-plus funds, 250 were technically "under
water." Many charitable organizations are struggling right now
because of the economic downturn, but their charitable needs
still continue. So, the question is how does a volunteer sitting
on that board in a prudent manner deal with the funds they have
available to meet those charitable needs. That is the intent of
this bill.
SENATOR OLSON said he's having a hard time equating charitable
funds with institutional funds, which are used more to make sure
that "some kind of university or some learning institution can
continue to function in spite of what's happened."
SENATOR PASKVAN responded that specifically the University
distributes scholarships, and students continue to be educated
even in depressed economic times. In fact, the demand for
education increases in a down economy.
8:14:08 AM
JIM LYNCH, University of Alaska Foundation, said the purpose of
an endowment is to support a program in perpetuity. How do you
do that? It requires income as well as consistency. Students who
are getting scholarships are there for four and five years or
more. The issue is how to sustain their scholarships over the
long term prudently. You can't have rigid rules to do that.
While the University is one of the primary managers of
endowments, a lot of other organizations have these funds for
different purposes.
He explained that most of these funds come to the organizations
through contributions. Courts have held with following the
donor's intent rather than rigid rules. The law identified a lot
of areas as to what prudence is and what has to be considered in
making decisions. This guidance is includes "best practices" for
non-profit boards many of which are run by volunteers. Thirty-
seven states have adopted or introduced bills regarding this
rule.
8:17:28 AM
SENATOR OLSON asked if scholarships will be awarded from the
corpus, not just the earnings.
MR. LYNCH replied that this concept really came into play about
40 years ago. It moved from principal and income, which doesn't'
fit the endowment concept very well in today's environment.
"It's purpose and mission that drive this law."
SENATOR OLSON asked SENATOR PASKVAN to interpret whether that is
a yes or no.
MR. LYNCH said the answer is a yes, but the concept of "corpus"
no longer exists.
SENATOR PASKVAN expanded upon his answer. Specifically, this law
is default legislation in the sense that a charitable
contribution has been made that doesn't have express
restrictions on it. Many contributions are made to funds so that
food can be distributed to the needy. The question is can those
monies be used to fulfill the purpose of the organization, which
is to feed the hungry and give scholarships to people when they
need it whether it's good financial times or bad. This says that
prudent management allows for those fiduciaries who are running
a fund to make the distributions that are necessary and
appropriate - unless there are express restrictions regarding
distribution of the capital, like with the Permanent Fund - in
both good and bad financial times.
8:21:16 AM
SENATOR STEVENS asked if this has any impact on the Permanent
Fund.
SENATOR PASKVAN replied that it does not.
8:22:04 AM
VICE CHAIR DAVIS withdrew her objection and version S CS was
adopted.
SENATOR STEVENS moved to report CSSB 134 (EDC) from committee
with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s).
There being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 105 changes from original to vR.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| CSSB 134 vS.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| SB 105, CS vR.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 105, CS vR Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 105 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 105 Key Provisions.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 105 McKinney-Vento Q&A.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 105 Covenent House lttr.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB 134 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 Commonfund article.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 U of A Foundation lttr of support.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 Foraker Group lttr of support.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| SB105-DHSS-CSM-03-05-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB105-DHSS-FCBR-03-05-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB105-DHSS-FP-03-05-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB105-UA-Sysbra-03-23-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB105-EED-ESS-03-25-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 105 |
| SB134-LAW-CIV-3-19-09.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| UPMIFA Map 2-6-09 v1.pdf |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| UPMIFA Sectional Analysis v4.doc |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |
| Why adopt UPMIFA v3.doc |
SEDC 3/25/2009 8:00:00 AM |
SB 134 |