Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/24/1997 09:03 AM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 132 CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFO, INCL. SEX OFFENDER
CHAIRMAN WILKEN announced SB 132 to be up for consideration.
ANNE CARPENETI, Department of Law, explained that this bill has two
parts dealing with criminal background information. The first part
amends AS 12.62 which is the criminal justice information systems
and the security statutes in two general ways; first by clarifying
procedures for a person to get background information held by the
FBI. Secondly, it eliminates the historical time limitation on
prior convictions and the ability to obtain information on prior
convictions for State records.
Ms. Carpeneti said the second part of the bill brings the state in
compliance with the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and
Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act. In order to stay
eligible for 100 percent funding from the Burn formula funding
grants the legislation is necessary. It requires the state to
adopt a two-tier sex offender registration program - one for
certain offenses against children and sexually violent crimes and
requires registration for at least 10 years. The other second part
of the Wetterling Act provides more stringent registration
requirements for sexually violent predators. Ms. Carpeneti
informed the committee that Alaska already has a two-step sex
offender registration procedure. The first is for 15-years for
first time sex offenders and the second requires recidivist sex
offenders to register for life. Ms. Carpeneti explained that the
Wetterling Act requires the state to appoint panels of experts in
behavior and the treatment of sex offenders which would examine a
person who has been convicted of a sex offense and make a
recommendation to the sentencing court whether or not that person
should be classified as a sexually violent predator. If a person
is classified as a sexually violent predator, he or she would
remain there until the board examined the person at a later date
and made the recommendation that the person is no longer sexually
violent. The recommendation would have to go back to the original
sentencing court and the court would make the determination if that
person has ceased to be a sexually violent predator.
Ms. Carpeneti said there are several problems with that approach.
The cost of establishing a statewide board of experts would be
significant and the second and more significant cost would be to
litigate whether or not the individual is a sexually violent
predator and remains one. The potential for litigation is for the
life of the person. For these reasons, the department has been
working with the federal government on an alternate approach which
the department expects will be accepted. The legislation proposes
in addition to the life-time registration of recidivist offenders,
to add to that category persons who are convicted for the first
time of the most serious sexual offenses, sexual assault in the
first degree (an unclassified felony) and sexual abuse of a minor
in the first degree (also an unclassified felony). Ms. Carpeneti
said the Wetterling Act also requires verification of the addresses
of sexually violent predators through registration every 90 days.
SENATOR WARD asked for a copy of the Wetterling Act for all
committee members and asked if the state is receiving the grant
money now. ANNE CARPENETI replied yes. SENATOR WARD asked if
there is a document saying that our laws are out of compliance and
the state will not receive it this year. Senator Ward requested a
copy of that also. ANNE CARPENETI noted that the department has
had communications with the Department of Justice setting forth the
requirements of what the state must do. At this point, the
department knows that the state is not in compliance. The federal
government has not formally said that the federal money will be cut
off. SENATOR WARD asked her to get a letter stating that to the
committee. ANNE CARPENETI replied that she would do her best.
SENATOR GREEN asked if there was a timing sequence that other
things might happen at the federal level.
TAPE 97-33, SIDE B
Number 580
SENATOR GREEN said that might make it easier for the state to
comport to what they have done afterwards. ANNE CARPENETI replied
that two other pieces of law have been passed since the Wetterling
Act. One is Megan's Law which addresses notification of the
location of sex offenders and that is addressed in this bill by
allowing the Department of Public Safety to adopt regulations
addressing notification. The second is a bill requiring some time
in the future the FBI to establish a tracking system of sex
offenders. That is provided in this bill by requiring the
Department of Public Safety to notify the State and FBI whenever a
sex offender moves out of State and notify the state they are
moving to.
Ms. Carpeneti explained that other states are trying to find
creative alternatives for the board of experts, but some of the
provisions of the Wetterling Act can't be changed. The state has
adopted guidelines, which she will provide the committee, which
gives them a lot more freedom in certain areas.
SENATOR GREEN did not think the current sex offender registration
system in Alaska went far enough. ANNE CARPENETI pointed out that
Alaska is more stringent than federal statutes, in that first
offenses must register for 15 years. The Wetterling Act starts
with 10 years as a floor rather than a ceiling. Alaska also has
the life-time registration for recidivists which is more serious
that federal requirements.
SENATOR GREEN was concerned that the state would be pulling people
into the system who have only been charged, but not convicted.
Number 556
ANNE CARPENETI thought that was a reading mistake because you only
have to register after conviction.
SENATOR GREEN asked her to explain page 2, section 4. ANNE
CARPENETI explained that section addresses the criminal justice
information security system which is different than the Wetterling
Act.
CHAIRMAN WILKEN asked what was challenged in court and then came
back in State law over the last couple of years. ANNE CARPENETI
replied that the ex-post facto issue, which means adopting a
punishment that was not in affect when the act was committed was
challenged. She found that no state or federal court has upheld
the challenge based and our case in Alaska has been dismissed.
CHAIRMAN WILKEN said that SB 132 would be held for further
discussion and adjourned the meeting at 9:56 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|